Tee1up

Tee1up

Lives in Saskatoon
Works as a Freelance Developer
Joined on Nov 23, 2010

Comments

Total: 193, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On article Hasselblad responds to Lunar criticisms (613 comments in total)
In reply to:

OhioPhoto: I've been involved in some difficult product launches. And here's what typically happens.

80% of the people on the team are frustrated or disheartened by the response. A lot of genuinely professional and well-intentioned people have a lot on the line here. And I feel for them.

20% will insist that the product is the photographic equivalent of Stravinsky's Rite of Spring -- people rioted when it first came out, but over time it was embraced as a classic.

I hope for Hassy's sake the 20% are justified in their optimism. Great company. Great tradition. But this is a tough one. They know the photo community can be brutal.

Hasselblad has a long history of incredible engineering. Even though their mechanical cameras were a bit boxy, they had their own industrial funkiness that most including me thought was beautiful. Add to that great ergonomics and it is no wonder that so many pros gravitated to HB cameras. This...thing... is at the complete opposite end of that spectrum and looks desperate.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 21:25 UTC

Yikes. I'm all for innovation but if this is really being considered, it may be time to change the bong water.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 00:56 UTC as 200th comment
In reply to:

Dan: Why would you buy this over a D800? I'm seriously asking this because I would like to know.

Well, it is capable of shooting at ISO 1600...so there is that.

Seriously though, Leica makes some of the worlds best glass but once the cameras went digital I can't understand why someone would pay this kind of money. They have gotten a lot of milage out of their old, sturdy mechanical rangefinder's reputation. Purely an emotional purchase.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 00:48 UTC
In reply to:

tkpenalty: Love all the spec-sheet warriors here, because totally, having a max sensitivity of ISO1600 means that the camera is worse than a D800.

Okay sure, it is very expensive and maybe a bit overpriced. But seriously? Comparing it to a D800?

I totally agree. If you have a D800 why would you ever consider spending 4 or 5 times more money on this.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 00:43 UTC
On article Just Posted: Hands-on Nikon D600 preview (376 comments in total)

This is a pretty exciting camera. $1000 less than the D800 but still packing a great feature set.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 13, 2012 at 15:40 UTC as 52nd comment | 3 replies
On article Just Posted: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 review (373 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peter Gaunt: Interesting looking camera. Why though does this site, and some others, persist in giving sensor sizes in rather bizarre fractions of an inch such as 1/1.7 (there's even mention of 1/1.63 somewhere in the article). It's so difficult to visualise. What's wrong with simply saying 15mm or 0.6".

I totally agree. These fractional sensor sizes are meaningless to anyone. Everyone can grasp 13.2 x 8.8mm. That being said, I too would like to thank DP for adding the aperture range chart. For me it is the most useful spec when assessing these cameras.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 01:26 UTC
In reply to:

Tape5: What a great compact beautifully designed affordable light and capable piece of garbage.

LOL. thanks! That really made be chuckle.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 23, 2012 at 00:14 UTC

Microscopic sensor, no viewfinder. Another disposable camera.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 21, 2012 at 17:34 UTC as 33rd comment | 2 replies
On article Just Posted - Sony NEX-F3 review (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

IcyVeins: I think DPR loves my contributions to these review threads because in this one for example I am still singlehandedly responsible for one third of the posts, and this is only the apetizer, I guarantee you I'll be in full bwon attack mode when the RX100, NEX-5R, and NEX-6 reviews come out, I'll be ripping Canikon and Samsung to shreds for the inferiority and general ineptitude.

Yeah, and spam makes up 90% of my inbox but you won't see me giving those creatures high-fives. Seriously IcyV, you can't make categorical statements like that without coming off like a flake. DP reviews are unique in the industry and I think they do it without bias and with us, the end users in mind. This review in particular nailed it. Nuff said.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 17, 2012 at 03:59 UTC
On article Just Posted - Sony NEX-F3 review (129 comments in total)
In reply to:

IcyVeins: HOW CAN YOU GIVE THIS A LOWER SCORE THAN THE NX210??? THAT MUST BE WRONG, SONY IS THE BEST

Is there not a link somewhere that will allow me to send IcyVeins a good shock or at least a book on managing puberty?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 16, 2012 at 20:56 UTC
On article Editing on the road (114 comments in total)
In reply to:

Camediadude: Thanks .. most intriguing to see other's habits and techniques. (I'll pass on the overpriced and over-hyped apple devices though)

I would hate to re-awaken an already tired argument but in spite of the costs, the Apple systems speed up my workflow in every way. Professionally I have to work with PC and Mac systems but if getting it done quickly and properly is essential, the Mac's will always get my vote.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 13, 2012 at 19:57 UTC

I totally agree. AA batteries are essential for cameras like this.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2012 at 06:40 UTC as 27th comment
On article Nikon addresses 1 V1 and 1 J1 flaws with firmware v1.2 (41 comments in total)

I had a friend complain about this phenomena just last weekend. She will be glad to see this update.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2012 at 03:17 UTC as 8th comment
In reply to:

Sam Carriere: It would be wonderful is Dpreview left this NASA boondoggle to the newspapers and concentrated on matters of interest to photographers.

A story about NASA's sensor choice is completely appropriate.
You have become jaded Sam.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2012 at 03:11 UTC
On article First Impressions: Using the Nikon D4 (183 comments in total)
In reply to:

newcameraguy2821: Here are some interesting videos about the D4 Camera:

Nikon D4 Hands-on Review
http://shrt.fm/wyj5fM

Nikon D4 unboxing
http://shrt.fm/FPMD8f

Nikon D4 Low Light Field Test
http://shrt.fm/FU56jy

The First D4 link just seems to hang. "Video is now starting" message. Isn't.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2012 at 02:12 UTC
On article Review: Nokia 808 PureView (349 comments in total)

Are there any iPhone users that can comment on this gallery compared to what they have shot? Just curious....

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2012 at 00:35 UTC as 131st comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

zorgon: I wouldn't get one myself, but the 1/2" sensor is definitely an improvement over the standard 1/2.3" sensor typically found on these superzooms. They are useful cameras in bright light. Idea for the stealth beach pervert.

And, it is an 8mm diagonal sensor or just under 1/3 of an inch. Yeah I know, all companies use this anachronistic measurement system that in no way reflects the true size of the sensor but it drives me crazy.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 25, 2012 at 17:00 UTC
On article Canon EOS M hands-on preview (563 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marty4650: This camera seems to be very similar to the much cheaper Panasonic G1X.... except the G1X gives you built in pop up flash, a built in EVF, digital zoom, and lenses with OIS built into them.

I see Amazon has the G1X down to $559 with the standard (non folding) kit lens.

Canon needs to offer a better value than this one.

I think you've made an accurate assessment. Indeed the G1X is a more well rounded camera. I 've gone through the review a couple times now and it occurred to me that the inspiration for the design was probably the Powershot SX240 HS.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 15:45 UTC
On article Canon EOS M hands-on preview (563 comments in total)
In reply to:

thisisjh: I need viewfinder viewfinder viewfinder....

I agree. In spite of promises of bigger, more detailed and brighter, rear LCDs so far they all completely suck in bright sunlight. No exceptions. I suppose the challenge for Canon now is that even if they offer a nice EVF it will make this a pretty expensive camera.

I was hoping to see Canon take the Fuji XPro 1 and put their own spin on things.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 15:34 UTC

These cameras make sense to me with short pancake lenses but as soon as you strap on anything bigger, you have to wonder why folks don't just pick up something like the T4i/T3i.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 04:29 UTC as 401st comment | 6 replies
Total: 193, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »