Lives in Saskatoon
Works as a Freelance Developer
Joined on Nov 23, 2010


Total: 193, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

HubertChen: Here is a very good Article about facts on Adobe Photoshop Cloud which is missing entirely in the discussions here: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/adobe_cc.shtml. And for those who just want to rant there is a good cartoon and a link on a very dark satire on youtube.

I love that cartoon - thanks for sharing.
I wonder what would happen if you were working on something controversial or what if you ran into legal issues related to copyright/model release issues. Could big brother turn off the spigot until their legal sensibilities are satiated?

Link | Posted on May 10, 2013 at 14:52 UTC

Any time you try and hand-cuff users like this, you create a fertile garden for our hacker brethren. My guess is you will also see more users thinking 'hey, that Aperture program really gets most of what I need done'.

Bad move Adobe.

Link | Posted on May 10, 2013 at 14:38 UTC as 240th comment
On article Celebrities who love photography (66 comments in total)

LOL, this Bryan Adams guy has talent and access to everyone it seems.

Link | Posted on May 2, 2013 at 15:26 UTC as 17th comment
In reply to:

leecamera: To be honest this is a fantastic effort on a budget of zip.

It's interesting that Marc uses the GoPro as he'd be shooting video with each rather than a series of stills - which opens possibilities to editing motion within the Matrix effect.

I think the comments about motion artifacts may be confused with the "scratch" editing within the action. We've got some interesting forwards and backwards motion of the subject whilst the tracking motion continues in the same direction. This is the first time I've seen this and kudos to Marc for coming up with a variation on a well known effect.

And to the critics of the execution... please send us your examples - we'd love to see how much better your versions are...

I agree. Zero budget it aint but it is indeed seriously cool.

Link | Posted on Mar 19, 2013 at 13:08 UTC
In reply to:

Cy Cheze: Wonderful gear to have for a $10k job for those clients with $100k to spend for the finest.

Meanwhile, a must-have for the $500 / wedding photogs: a lens that optically reduces the subjects' girth, clothing size, dental or dermatological problems, and bad hair. Why can't that old goat (the guy footing the bill?) smile? Well, he probably thinks $500 is way to much.

Sometimes an over-bright flash, complete defocus, and general blow-out is the best "fix."

LOL. Awesome.

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 16:59 UTC
On article Nikon and Canon UK offer Spring 2013 camera rebates (16 comments in total)
In reply to:

backayonder: The D600 rebate also comes with a free oil change

Made my day. Thanks man.

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2013 at 21:19 UTC
On article Photoshop Gradient Tool: Blending Images (223 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jordan Norris: I don't get it, the sky in the first photos looks equally "exciting". Some simple lightroom/darkroom work on the first photo would do the trick. Doesn't seem like photography to me, seems more like arts and crafts.

When I look at the two, the first image with a bit more brightness in the sky gives me the impression they have weathered a storm. The second image suggest to me that things are about to get nasty. (My 2c.)

Link | Posted on Mar 10, 2013 at 19:39 UTC
In reply to:

LarryK: Rambus is not so much a technology company, but rather a patent lawsuit mill.

Best to walk away from anything they develop, it's likely just something their attorneys will use to sue people.

Lawyers and judges are spectacularly ignorant when it comes to technology and it gets worse when parades of engineers are brought into court rooms to try and demonstrate proof of orignal ownership and design.

I'm with larryK, these guys had an ethical bypass at birth.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2013 at 22:44 UTC

Thank goodness. Even people that have never used a camera were apologizing for this thing.

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2013 at 22:42 UTC as 39th comment
On article Ethics of prize-winning photo debated (151 comments in total)
In reply to:

donjose: Idiot. The rifle is not even a sniper rifle. It is a shotgun. Snipers don't use shotguns. The photographer doesn't even know what he is talking about. I don't believe his story about research never meant to be made public. He tried to fake a scene and got caught.

I was looking at the weapon and the belt on his shoulder and thinking the same thing...snipers using a shotgun?

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2013 at 02:54 UTC
On article Just Posted: Nikon Coolpix S800c Review (79 comments in total)

They need to put a poison sticker on this camera. Poor picture quality especially indoors so it is able to compete with iphone/galaxy. WiFi so you can sit in front of your computer and download images wirelessly in 4 times the time you could if you removed a card. Gotta stop there. Too painful.

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2013 at 04:16 UTC as 24th comment
On article Hands-on with Fujifilm's X100S (62 comments in total)

Okay, don't want to get excited, too early, but this is looking seriously do-able.

Link | Posted on Jan 11, 2013 at 02:25 UTC as 22nd comment
On article Roundup: Enthusiast Zoom Compact Cameras (424 comments in total)

I would love to have that RX100 for a week, just to see if I could get used to no viewfinder. That is really my only complaint with that unit.

Link | Posted on Dec 19, 2012 at 03:33 UTC as 119th comment | 2 replies
On article Canon Powershot S110 hands-on preview (107 comments in total)

Does anyone really shoot 12 mp and then wifi or piggyback on their cell phones to move these images around? I guess I am just too old to get the usefulness of this. And yes, even a cheesy optical view finder would put this camera on my radar.

Link | Posted on Nov 29, 2012 at 18:13 UTC as 16th comment
In reply to:

dpreviewprov: I am not denying the problem.

However, if you shoot with a DSLR, prepare to clean your own sensor at some point.

It is easy enough. Watch here:

I expect to have to clean my sensor from time to time but I really wish Nikon sold this with a wet-clean system. Compared to the sot of the camera, it is not a lot of money but a part of me resents having to give the D600 a sponge bath once a week.

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2012 at 07:05 UTC
On article Just Posted: Canon PowerShot G15 review (338 comments in total)
In reply to:

ET2: DPR puts RX100 in a different class. They claim the scores are not comparable between different classes, but yet they mention RX100 everywhere in this review. Isn't that hilarious?

RX100 should have been in the same class as S110. These cameras are competing for the same market. Same buyers.

Putting RX100 in the same class as larger -- not pocketable -- big sensor p&s (such as G1X) or cameras with a fix lens primes like Fuji X100 was really really dumb.

Dude, I think DPR was bang on mentioning the RX100 camera as they did. Sensor size matters and for most point & shoot users, it becomes a question of price versus performance. DPR made that abundantly clear in this review. Not hilarious.

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2012 at 02:17 UTC

Well, you can't ask for more proof than that. Is anyone aware of Nikon making a statement about this?

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2012 at 01:35 UTC as 88th comment | 5 replies
On article Just Posted: Leica X2 real-world sample gallery (106 comments in total)

I would love to own some Leica lenses but the cameras just don't do it for me. The days of passing a camera down to the next generation are long gone.

Link | Posted on Nov 20, 2012 at 06:38 UTC as 16th comment | 1 reply
On article Just Posted: Nikon D600 In-depth Review (498 comments in total)
In reply to:

Superka: Canon 6D would be Platinum Award. Canon does not have mud on sensors.

I guess I should have gone to superka.com to get the real skinny on the d600. What was i thinking? Thanks for that in depth assessment.

Link | Posted on Nov 14, 2012 at 21:46 UTC
On article Just Posted: Nikon D600 In-depth Review (498 comments in total)
In reply to:

wakaba: Have D600 for 4 weeks now. No dirt on sensor. Very decent ergonomics and faster processing than D800e.
Got this instead of a 800e because the 800e is not yet in middleformat territory, so I wait this out while having a lot of fun with the D600.

The body outperforms lenses. So far the 50mm-1.4G is the only one keeping up, barely.

Jut out of curiosity, which lenses are you finding inadequate for this camera?

Link | Posted on Nov 14, 2012 at 21:43 UTC
Total: 193, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »