Tee1up

Tee1up

Lives in Saskatoon
Works as a Freelance Developer
Joined on Nov 23, 2010

Comments

Total: 207, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Apple to cease development of Aperture article (424 comments in total)
In reply to:

danieljcox: I agree with karip regarding miscalculations and a snow flake starting an avalanche. Right after Apple announced the death of Aperture they make sure to mention they plan to still support their other two pro apps. Then they release updates to those apps. Nice try, if anyone thinks that the other pro apps are not on the table for elimination, you're fooling yourself. One of the main ways Apple sold computers in the past was due to great softer that only ran on the Mac. The death of Aperture has seriously fractured my faith in Apple making great software for just their machines. That was the benefit of buying a Mac, it had the best software. Apple is eliminating one of the reasons to buy their equipment. Not a smart move. I'm really, really surprised at this announcement.

Daniel J. Cox
www.naturalexposures.com

You make a good point SDPharm. I guess I like having Apple keep a few fingers in the development pie if only because they have (in the past) been masters of keeping the interface simple. I too have a copy of LR (4) and maybe the newer versions are better but i tend to struggle with it. Aperture does everything I've ever wanted, and seems so clean.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 12, 2014 at 04:12 UTC
On Apple to cease development of Aperture article (424 comments in total)
In reply to:

danieljcox: I agree with karip regarding miscalculations and a snow flake starting an avalanche. Right after Apple announced the death of Aperture they make sure to mention they plan to still support their other two pro apps. Then they release updates to those apps. Nice try, if anyone thinks that the other pro apps are not on the table for elimination, you're fooling yourself. One of the main ways Apple sold computers in the past was due to great softer that only ran on the Mac. The death of Aperture has seriously fractured my faith in Apple making great software for just their machines. That was the benefit of buying a Mac, it had the best software. Apple is eliminating one of the reasons to buy their equipment. Not a smart move. I'm really, really surprised at this announcement.

Daniel J. Cox
www.naturalexposures.com

If this is going to be a trend for Apple - allowing their serious tools to expire then you have to wonder why they bothered refreshing the Mac Pro. They are not giving users more reasons to want to use their serious hardware.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2014 at 21:35 UTC
On Apple to cease development of Aperture article (424 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tom Zimmer: part two.

This is all very different from the way the rest of the world (read: Windows) does things. Instead of re-writing, applications, they are evolved and end up containing lots and lots of archaic (read: very old) code that should go away, but can't because lots of little parts rely on that archaic code.

Again, Do i like having to re-learn a program when Apple re-writes it? No. BUT, I will because I understand it is for my own good.

I am a professional software engineer, I don't work for Apple, and I make my living writing Windows software. Believe me, i know how it works.

I hope you are right about a 'brand spanking new' program because iPhoto was not the answer. I still get a nosebleed thinking about the organizational layout of that program.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2014 at 21:30 UTC
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1532 comments in total)
In reply to:

Parry Johnson: I bought a Fuji S2 in 2002 for over $3000, sold it to a friend in 2006 for $400, and recently sold it again as part of his estate for $79. Resale value should not be a concern in this industry. Usefulness value should. I never expect to get any money back from my camera equipment, but expect it to pay for itself (and then some!) through actual paying clients or through the pure pleasure of the fun of photography.

So, for those well-heeled amateurs, go for it! For those not-so-well-heeled professionals and professional-wannabees-who-have-another-actual-full-time-job like me, euh... maybe, but only if it's really going to "pay off."

This is precisely why I consider modern Leica cameras a waste of money. I do think there is an argument for investing in their glass and using it on cheaper electronic bodies.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2014 at 04:19 UTC
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2300 comments in total)

I really don't get the attraction of this kind of thing. Charging a huge premium for "hand-finishing" an essentially useless external shell while incorporating the guts that can be had with other brands for a fraction of the price. I love precision engineering when it comes to mechanical movements and such but this really is as another poster noted, competition for that silly Hasselblad.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 20:53 UTC as 533rd comment | 4 replies
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4: a quick summary article (471 comments in total)

Serious video from such a small package. I'm not sure i will ever have anything capable of post-editing 4k video but the 200fps HD bit has my attention. Very cool.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 9, 2014 at 12:02 UTC as 46th comment | 1 reply
On Using third-party lenses on Sony Cyber-shot a7 / a7R article (491 comments in total)

What a great concept. A million years ago I bought a Nikon F3Hp with a 50mm f1.4 lens ... the sharpest lens I've ever owned ... would love to give this baby new life.

Is this the kind of thing they are talking about or am I digging too deep in the history channel?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2014 at 04:47 UTC as 113th comment | 4 replies
On Nikon AF-S Nikkor 58mm f/1.4G review preview (412 comments in total)
In reply to:

A-Frame: This lens is a portrait photographer's dream. $1,700 for a lens is not absurd to a professional or amateur photographer who knows the purpose and value of this lens. The so called experts here will always have something to complain about.

If you saw a pic with this lens and one side by side from any standard Nikon 50mm - would you be able to tell the difference? Just curious.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 2, 2014 at 03:45 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2817 comments in total)

I can't help but think Nikon will not find a lot of traction with this camera. Like the black & white only Leica, I am not sure who the target audience is for this. I feel strange saying this given how much I love the Fuji X100S.

Just dunno.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 8, 2013 at 15:26 UTC as 62nd comment | 4 replies
On Hands-on with the retro Nikon Df article (230 comments in total)
In reply to:

inframan: I don't know if I'd actually want to shoot with this but I do think it would look beautiful prominently displayed in a glass case. Maybe Nikon could come out with a "dummy" non-working version like some gun collectors buy, all looks & no guts. They might even get more buyers.

If you are looking for a trophy, save a couple thousand and grab an old Nikon off ebay.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2013 at 01:15 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)

Make a digital F3HP and I am in.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 23:02 UTC as 302nd comment
On Fujifilm X100S Review preview (485 comments in total)
In reply to:

tallguy600: I moved from a D600 to the X100s and for me that works. I also have a Sony RX100 when I need more focal range selection.
The X100s viewfinder is great and the 35mm is my favorite focal length.
Excellent image quality and it just feels right.

Tallguy - any thoughts on the new AF and MF changes?
thanks.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 20, 2013 at 04:30 UTC
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2372 comments in total)

That A7 price actually sounds pretty reasonable.
Must keep watching....

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2013 at 10:00 UTC as 655th comment
On Nikon D610 preview (627 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hauer: I don't think Nikon has done their existant D600 a favour by introducing the D610 under a cloud of technological secrecy. Coulden't have been a worse investment due to extreme devaluation of the D600. Also compounded by a reduction in retail price of the D610.
Nikon should have offered more transparency in respect of the oil spill fault and to rectify their reputation, should have offered D600 a free D610 replacement.
Glad I don't own the D600 as I would have been terribly frustrated...

The real reason to buy the D610 is so you can parade it around D600 users, just to let them know their 'baby' is a bit ... wrong.
<grin>

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 11:34 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II Review preview (507 comments in total)

I agree with the review. You really have to compare this camera with those of a similar price point and while the RX100-2 is a very good performer, it begins to pale a bit when you see what is available for the same money.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2013 at 11:18 UTC as 75th comment | 2 replies
On Nikon 1 AW1 preview (587 comments in total)

Even if I bought it, I don't think I could bring myself to submerge it.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 03:58 UTC as 60th comment | 3 replies
On Fujifilm X-M1 Review preview (217 comments in total)
In reply to:

thx1138: Hadn't realised the M1 had no EVF or option. I had just assumed that was the A1. Oh well another coulda shoulda woulda camera.

Not really sure what Fuji's thinking is here. One the one hand they think you are sophisticated enough to understands the benefits of a big sensor, and IL, and DoF and manual control, but think you are still so amateurish as to hold a camera at arms length to frame a scene, in bright sunlight where the VF can hardly be seen and the camera is far less stable and more prone to shake.

So is it still a P&S or a serious camera?

I was hoping to reply to T3's comment. I find your comment amazingly condescending. The generation you refer to may not mind trying to frame a picture, outdoors in bright light with a clumsy if not large LCD screen. Many of us though value precision, battery life and a OVF for it's simplicity.

I suppose I must defer to professionals, all of whom have a reason for avoiding your preferred smelly baby at arms length shot preparation.

Did you really, LOL twice while you wrote that comment or was that simply two more clumsy arrows that went astray?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2013 at 04:35 UTC
On SanDisk offers 'world's first' 256GB CompactFlash card article (70 comments in total)
In reply to:

AbrasiveReducer: All this pro stuff. The regular cards are already Extreme Pro, right? So these should be Ultra, Ultra, Extreme Super Pro.

It's too bad they don't hold their value. They take less space than gold bullion and you can't take pictures with gold bullion.

LOL - these guys are running out of hyperbole and superlatives quicker than my laundry soap manufacturers.

Nice one.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2013 at 23:58 UTC
In reply to:

kriztian: Real photographers are praising the Lumia 1020. Apple doesn´t even come close. Thats a fact. Cheers :)

I got stung with a Windows Smart-phone once. Never again.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2013 at 16:10 UTC
On 6 things iPhone photographers want from Apple post (66 comments in total)

Anytime i read about more megapixels I get a nosebleed.
Seems I just manage to absorb the idea that more is not better and then...the cold war on this issue heats up for smart phones.

Take a fully charged smart phone camera indoors...say a kid's birthday for example. Shoot 25-flash, 25- no flash pictures, doesn't matter and see how many a blury and how much battery life is left. Build a rating system on these numbers and maybe i will have a chance of understanding which camera is better....

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 01:08 UTC as 13th comment
Total: 207, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »