Robert Zanatta: $3.49 for an OTG cable, then use whatever USB device you want on your Android platform.
S7 comes with an OTG connector.
It's even more fun if you connect mouse and/or keyboard :D
Well. Doesn't it make more sense to just buy a reasonably pocketable m43 (or something similar) machine?
Yay, a puppy... Yaiiiii! Even more puppies! So cute (=^.^=)
XQD? I had to check wikipedia what does it mean, never heard it until now .... And ... Looks like another future-dead technology. And, well, Sony want to push something again? And who invented that "XQD" name for it? Completely unergonomic to pronounce (compared for example to "SD").
Well. Personally I'm more interested about somehow signing the metadata. I don't care about the content as I usually do not have problems if the images are shared somehow (but I can imagine some pro people need to have it locked too). It's usually that somebody just copy/paste the pictures and presents them as their own, even with a permissive licenses like CC.
1 month ago I've ordered sjcam m10. This Hero looks quite the same ... except it's 5x more expensive :D OK, it can do some 1440p, but I personally don't care about anything bigger than 720p.
jaxson: Is this earth rotation or moon orbiting, or a combo of both?
Both. But it's 28 days for Moon and 1 day for Earth. So mostly Earth in this case ^.^
Yeah. The internet is full of cats ... or meerkats :]Nice shot though.
peterharvey: These ultrawide angle zooms 7-14 mm with wide aperture at f2.8 is no lightweight; it is actually heavier than the flagship E-M1.
Well. Still 50% lighter than the current FT 7-14mm, and much less expensive too (1300 VS 2000)
JoePhoto: I think these are terrible images ... (not the cameras fault) !!!
Were they shot by a 2-year old ???
The WIRE in the sunset shot ??? give me a break
Well, they definitely look better than my pictures ^.^
3.15 x 1.65 x 1.06 inches ?I don't buy it unless it's metric!
RichRMA: The idea for this I think came from a movie where a similar camera was rolled into a tense stand-off situation to provide surveillance. I just can't remember what movie, but it was a few years ago.
Which one? The good one or the new one?
hanhait: The photographer owns the camera and obviously controls what is published (or deleted) or not. If the camera-owner makes it public, he still hold some rights I would say. Whether the camera is accendentally dropped, or given to or taken by an animal, I would say these are still the camera-owners pictures. In borderline cases like this I would say the one who does not want the publishment wins.
I'm not exactly sure how it works, but AFAIK: The camera, memory card and thus the data are owned by Mr.X, but as the photos were taken by the monkey, the artwork is owned by the monkey, although it is stored on Mr.X's hardware.It's like what I have in my little teahouse: I own the wall, I own the compressor and colors, and some guy (artist) came and used that to airbrush a big picture on it. So technically I own the picture (as hardware) but the artist owns the artwork (the spiritual property/act), unless he explicitely gives it up to me.So yes, it is complicated.
Valiant Thor: As I observe people and society I am 100% convinced that the smartphone is the worst invention in the history of the world, bar NONE. It has turned a once observant and interactive society into pathetic, electronic addicted, anti-social zombies who walk around with their glazed empty eyes affixed to those crappy little LCD boxes glued to their hand, their thumb frantically pushing stupid little chicklets around the screen with the look of a meth addict on their face and mortal fear in their mind that they would accidently miss one non-essential, meaningless message from an emotionless fellow zombie doing the same thing. They roam the malls dressed in jackass attire of distasteful, offensive, or sports related t-shirts, baggy silk exercise pants, bright Nike clown shoes, tattoos, and all the while radiating themselves with dangerous levels of packet-data microwave energy. The corporate illuminati puppet-masters must be laughing their billionaire butts off. Other than that, nice phone!
Made my day ^.^
Wow, according to gsm arena, this one has got dual SIM. 350 is a bit high, but we'll see what will the street price be. Under 300 this could be a buy.
No more Flash?YAY! Take that Adobe!
At these prices ... suddenly even OM-D E-M1 looks like a bargain.Seriously ...