Not bad. Actually, quite good effort from SONY.Personally I would prefer less Mpixels and wider 24mm angle. And the design is not on the pretty side either. No grip at all.Hope Panasonic is on the way with LX5 replacement.
I don't get it...What's the point previewing this lens without sample shots. I can't find them in this preview. Are they hidden somewhere?
it's good that car manufacturers doesn't offer to use TAPE for fixing brake defects.
Talking about focusing. The part of the review, with the picture of a kids face.I believe camera focused correctly. Because kids nose was in the center of the frame, so got into as a target. That's why hairs (and nose) are in the focus, but not the eyes. Camera did the job, it's just a shooters mistake.
Long time no LX6.
Jees.. guys...D800 and 5Dmk3, that supposed to be an affordable FF (well previous versions certainly were) suddenly are becoming unaffordable.
On the other hand. I can't blame Nikon on taking easy money from idiots, that are buying joly expensive cameras and shooting flowers in the yard...
There is only one positive thing about this camera: Lens mount that takes any of pentax lenses. Other manufacturers would never do this in their life...
I really don't like the humpbacked look of GF3 and "GF5".I think you must to love your camera and the way it looks to enjoy using it.And this one is just ugly.
Stop moanings about manual focus.At this super wide angle, you set it at infinity and forget about it...
mezzoforte: Why not just make a smart phone with a better lens and sensor like what Nokia did ?
I'm getting Nokia 808
Viewfinder looks tiny.
millan: Tiny issue? I am already sick and tired of manufacturers putting their bug products on the market just in order to overtake the competition. The customers are then very often persuated by service that it is not an "issue", but "property" of the product. I had similar experience with TV, mobile phone, lens. What kind of strange world do we live in?
Not strange world - world full of capitalism and clever marketing.Less cost - max profit, people fooling PR and so on... ;)And it will be worse in the future :)
My next digital will be mirrorless. But not yet. These cameras still needs to be improved technically and in price, so I'm tend to wait a little.
This is getting ridiculous...
Seriously? 2.3 grand for slow focus, buggy menu, weird iso setting system and etc.??Fuji, get back to planet Earth.Doesn't matter how amazing it will perform, a Fujifilm brand isn't worth that amount of my money. I'm staying with my FM3A.
Cmon, SONY,why not 64 megapixels? Just ridiculous 18...
Digital Suicide: What an ugly cameras, both ways: design and image production.
Take it easy guys, It is my actual opinion. It is a free world, isn't it? I actually own a Nikon camera, but its not my religion. Not like to some of you, perhaps.
What an ugly cameras, both ways: design and image production.
If canon would fulfill your desires and put in it 24mm and F2.0-3.3, - it would probably sign the kill werdict to its' rebel line...