Digital Suicide

Digital Suicide

Lives in Lithuania Lithuania
Works as a yes
Has a website at no
Joined on Sep 24, 2011

Comments

Total: 147, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Samsung NX mini First Impressions Review preview (566 comments in total)

All photography gear sites should ignore pointless cameras like this.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2014 at 06:03 UTC as 147th comment | 1 reply

Looking a this crap, I wonder how luxuriuos must be working conditions in the Nikon's marketing department...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 13, 2014 at 06:01 UTC as 52nd comment
On Nikon D610 Review preview (336 comments in total)

Ok, now put all of your hate here and don't forget to press 1 up for your comment.

By the way, thanks DPR for great review of great camera.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 12, 2014 at 17:15 UTC as 100th comment
On Shooting Raw with the Nokia Lumia 1020 post (72 comments in total)
In reply to:

AbrasiveReducer: I understand raw capability should made it more attractive to serious users. But wouldn't a serious raw user conclude that to get better quality, one needs to use a camera to take pictures?

I agree with AbrasiveReducer. RAW on the phone is just a marketing. This trick works especially on those, who doesn't know what is RAW.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 24, 2014 at 17:52 UTC

Fuji guys, stop toying around.
Just install a lens mount on the next gen X100SS.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 14, 2014 at 13:38 UTC as 44th comment | 6 replies
On Nokia Lumia 1520 camera review post (101 comments in total)

It's just way too big. That repels many potential buyers, I think. Else is great.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2014 at 07:56 UTC as 26th comment
On Using third-party lenses on Sony Cyber-shot a7 / a7R article (496 comments in total)

It's true, that SONY made cameras to choose the slowest shutter speeds as posible. I see it in my RX-100 too. Sometimes it's so slow, that IS doesn't help. It does annoys me and makes me use shutter priority instead of aperture priority.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 22, 2014 at 05:31 UTC as 115th comment | 1 reply

All looks good, the only thing phone itself is too big. I wish Nokia would come up with something smaller (like 925) and the same 20 Mp camera. Don't offer me 1020, I don't like it for its bulkyness as well.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 29, 2013 at 17:28 UTC as 32nd comment | 1 reply
On Nikon Df Review preview (1618 comments in total)
In reply to:

Fred Mueller: Nikon did not have the courage to make a really retro FF digital camera ...

That camera would have been much simpler, might not have even needed a menu system - certainly not just "same old, same old" non-tabbed "list", and would have had an incredible optical viewfinder with focus screen options ... and like Nikons of old, it would index the max f-stop of the lenses (manual) when mounted (that is what "AI" means - auto indexing) ... and would have been kitted with the still in catalog 50mm 1.4 AI-s.

The Df = big engine/no shocks/shifter on the column

(yes I had a good/handle look at my LCS)

All you have said means - inovation. When did Nikon implemented something last time? Hmmm...
Df is nothing but old parts from nikons warehouse. Except maybe body. But wait, it's the same D600 body, only they skiped smoothing when making it.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 21, 2013 at 14:42 UTC
On Nikon Df Review preview (1618 comments in total)
In reply to:

_Federico_: I can accept a plastic body even for a camera which should be a digital FM, I can accept a bad, non interchangeable, focusing screen, I can accept to pay for it 3200 € ( in Italy) I can even accept, for this price, 1\4000 sec and exposure meter and shutter from an economic D600. I can accept a bad ergonomics and a single SD memory slot. But I can't accept all these factors AND a really bad AF system such like this one ( yes, I've owned a D600 and I was forced to sell it because it doesn't work with moving subjects and low light environment…too unreliable )

Well there are plenty cameras with good AF systems. If I'd have too much money, I wouldn't care about how fast and reliable AF is in Df, because most of the time I'd use my old MF lenses.
So, no split F screen is bigger problem than crappy AF.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 21, 2013 at 11:37 UTC
On Nikon Df Review preview (1618 comments in total)
In reply to:

Aleo Veuliah: This is a camera that I don't need any review to buy it. The look and the specs are enough for me to buy it without doubts.

Extremely Well Done Nikon.

So why you're here? :)

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2013 at 16:25 UTC
On Nikon Df Review preview (1618 comments in total)
In reply to:

Digital Suicide: Thanks DPR for the right review. Got your final words. They speak to me in only way: D610 is much clever choice (for me).

What is wrong with people obsessed with huge ISO numbers?
I don't need 10'000. It's ridiculous. And why would you offer me canon for my MF Nikkor lenses?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2013 at 16:15 UTC
On Nikon Df Review preview (1618 comments in total)
In reply to:

photo perzon: Nikon should make a smaller AFS retro for the rest of us.

Can you mount AI lens on your "Fuji"?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2013 at 16:08 UTC
On Nikon Df Review preview (1618 comments in total)

Thanks DPR for the right review. Got your final words. They speak to me in only way: D610 is much clever choice (for me).

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2013 at 13:49 UTC as 272nd comment | 7 replies
On Have Your Say: Best DSLR / SLT of 2013 article (335 comments in total)

Df best DSLR? You got to be kiddin me...

Direct link | Posted on Dec 19, 2013 at 06:30 UTC as 77th comment | 2 replies
On TIME's top photos of the year article (153 comments in total)

Nothing new. Death, pain and tears. Pictures that shocks you are considered best. As well as the stream of the negativity from the media has became a normal phenomenon. It's all about ratings.
Well there are good stuff in the world.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 7, 2013 at 09:33 UTC as 43rd comment

For social photography people use phones.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 1, 2013 at 09:50 UTC as 28th comment | 3 replies
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Review preview (578 comments in total)
In reply to:

John Driggers: Oh yeah...the flash doesn't work in silent mode as a criticism???? Why, pray tell, would you want the flash to fire when you are being "stealthy?"

In fact, if the flash would fire, THAT would be a valid criticism.

There are just too many really dumb observations in this review.

Exactly. The same thing with cameras having "clickless" ring. Why on earth would you want to manual focus with ring that has steps...?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 1, 2013 at 09:04 UTC
In reply to:

Digital Suicide: It doesn't look good. For it's price it' even bad.
"Pure photography" my *ss...

Well yes, marike6, it does perform better in low light, but very marginally to my eye. Do you really think it is worth that huge extra money comparing to D610 performance? Anyway, I,m sure you shoot much more often at ISO 200 than ISO 6400. Peace :)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2013 at 20:30 UTC

It doesn't look good. For it's price it' even bad.
"Pure photography" my *ss...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2013 at 16:52 UTC as 23rd comment | 7 replies
Total: 147, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »