Sam Bennett: I love my GM1, but the build leaves a lot to be desired. Mine is starting to "warp", resulting in the battery door not closing correctly, etc. I'll likely replace it with something more sturdy, so the E-PL7 is definitely on my radar. Oh, and I never use the flash on the GM1.
That has not been my experience, and I've used many "pro" cameras including the Canon 1 Series and the Nikon 7xx series. Again, I've been using these cameras the same way for years. They've all taken similar spills, etc. but the GM1 seems to be particularly fragile. The material around the flash is particularly thin, so it's unsurprising that it bent as it did. I'm hoping that the GM5 will be stronger in this regard since there's no flash, just the EVF.
This is not a general slam on the GM1 - I love it, and I'm really pleased that Panasonic has it in its lineup. I wish Olympus had something similar in size in theirs. But people should be aware that just because a body is made out of "metal" doesn't mean that it's indestructible.
I don't know why it's warping, unfortunately. I wear my GM1 on my hip in a SpiderHolster, with the pin in the tripod hole. It tends to get knocked around, so over time the frame may just be deforming. My son also knocked it out of my hands onto asphalt, bending the corner where the flash pops up from. I'm hard on my gear, and unfortunately the GM1 hasn't held up as well as previous cameras that I used in the same way (GF1, GF2, E-M5). It's a shame since I love it otherwise.
I love my GM1, but the build leaves a lot to be desired. Mine is starting to "warp", resulting in the battery door not closing correctly, etc. I'll likely replace it with something more sturdy, so the E-PL7 is definitely on my radar. Oh, and I never use the flash on the GM1.
tkpenalty: No RAW support. That's kinda pointless...
CombatMedic - Some of us shoot RAW only, with our iPads simply pulling the embedded JPEG out of the RAW file after transfer. It's cleaner and uses less space, although the quality is worse than using RAW+JPEG.
The real question for me is: Will this card function properly as an SD card and not destroy my photos. My experience with previous with previous Eye-Fi products has been so abysmal, I'm not sure I'm willing to give this another try.
I would actually argue that while lens can't produce the same amount of "background blur" as an equivalent FF lens/body combo, it actually can provide as much or similar "subject isolation".
Subject isolation for me isn't just about DoF - it's also about the focal length you're using, how it influences your distance to your subject and hence the perspective of the shot and how much background "clutter" is present. With the same amount of DoF present in two photos shot with different focal lengths (and different distances to maintain a consistent subject size) the wider focal length will result in less subject isolation and more background clutter.
In my experience, focal length is actually the more important factor in terms of isolation - that's why in practice the 45-200mm actually provides a good amount of isolation at long focal lengths, despite it's relatively slow aperture.