Great camera, but how much?
A great news.
Smart.This is something that Tillmans should have done.
The real hipsters? The hipsters are ALWAYS fake!
No one was taking videos?
The camera market is getting smaller smaller. That's it. I don't personally know any non-professional who bought a new camera last one year.
Please release lightweight version of Retrospective.
DSLR is a tool for a bad carpenter who tends to blame his tools.
A Reasonable and balanced camera, except Fuji dropped some of their film modes obviously for marketing reasons.
Arguably, any journalistic images have never been real. They are nothing but convenient visual tools to push publishers opinions. Journalists ONLY use the images that will support their opinion.
Now NYT is trying to confirm "our photo journalistic images are real, because those images are not digitally altered.".
I have a feeling that Olympus has the most advanced digital-optical technology.
The user should be the one who can decide if he wants to update or not. I know some professional designers who love CS3 and they don't see any reason to update.
The rant is not only from photographers community. A manager of one of the largest printing company told me this would be a disaster due to future compatibility issues.
atlien991: I can't believe this day came so soon. The pirates and torrenters defeated a billion dollar company. Open source won.
Those pirates and crackers should have been spending their time to develop open source alternative Photoshop instead of cracking it. Still not too late.
Here is my plan.
Keep using CS6 and Mountain Lion for next 5years, then move to the other software which will be more popular than CS cloud.
One question, why they do this?
I will stick to my current version, since I'm afraid all of my photoshop file wouldn't open one day when I have to cancel my subscription. Too scary to think I have to subscribe forever.
Marty4650: Those photos are really great examples of documentary work that shows us something interesting and relatively unknown to most of us. And the compositions themselves are actually pretty darn good.
I sense some real jealousy here.
This amateur photographer has had three exhibitions and has published two books. Which just goes to prove that you can't buy talent by owning the best cameras and lenses out there. You need an eye for composition and the ability to find interesting things to shoot.
I'm wondering what would have been if his camera was digital, instead of film...
And I ordered at Amazon. I believe this will be a classic.