dedirg

Joined on Apr 11, 2010

Comments

Total: 28, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article The Canon that can: Canon EOS 80D Review (681 comments in total)
In reply to:

mkbrkloster: My path started with Rebel, Rebel XT, and now T1i, all have served me well. I started with the kit lens, and upgraded and tweaked my lenses to match my shooting needs. 95% of my shots are of family and very rarely video (I've actually taken video on a DSLR 3 times, I think, over the years).

Given the lens investment, people like me don't switch from one brand to the other very often, if ever. A methodical upgrade in camera bodies that allows me to keep my lenses is all I need, even if some features (some of which I don't even care about) of other brands are better.

To switch from Canon to Sony would cost me a ton of money in lenses, and I would still not have the same lens set that I have now (converters are a hack).

I've been waiting for a new sensor to upgrade my T1i, and I got it in the 80d, which I will buy and use for the next 4-5 years. Sure, I'd love it if it were $999, but everything I buy I want a little cheaper.

There are a lot more of "me" out there than you think.

+1

Link | Posted on Apr 28, 2016 at 15:38 UTC
On article Small but mighty: hands on with the Panasonic GX85/GX80 (315 comments in total)

picture #9, I will choose phone not camera :)

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2016 at 08:49 UTC as 67th comment
On article Power Zoom: Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100/TZ100 Review (307 comments in total)

not so long ago many people happy with LX3 (24-60 zoom lens with 1/1.7 sensor size) and now many whinning for this. Very fast technology I think..

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2016 at 04:01 UTC as 72nd comment

if they serious with 1:1 macro, they sould offer proper flash instead its only a number of ratio

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 15:11 UTC as 65th comment | 1 reply
On article Newly enthused: hands on with the Canon EOS 80D (689 comments in total)
In reply to:

krectus: Pretty shocked that a DSLR released in 2016 can't shoot 4k. Especially a camera aimed at videographers (with it's own special video zooming device!). Surely Canon, who seems to need to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 4K world has a reason to not do this. The camera is capable, it's a big selling feature if they did? Why?! Why wouldn't they do this!?! It's 2016. Every smartphone released this year can do it. It really bothers me, I can't figure this out.

dont be shock, take care your health.. It is easy to find tools that meet our need, just this one is not for you... It is that easy.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 01:48 UTC
On article Newly enthused: hands on with the Canon EOS 80D (689 comments in total)

usually people whinning about dinamic range, but now it is 4K video. Is it mean this camera about good in dynamic range??? I dont use camera for video

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 01:34 UTC as 54th comment | 3 replies
On article Happy Holidays from dpreview! (119 comments in total)

selamat natal
(from indonesia)

Link | Posted on Dec 25, 2015 at 11:25 UTC as 57th comment
On article DxO ONE now available in 10 European countries (68 comments in total)

well, the ergonomic look bad

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2015 at 07:54 UTC as 14th comment | 7 replies
On article Canon introduces 430EX III-RT Speedlite (100 comments in total)
In reply to:

PeterY: So the 600 EX RT can trigger this but not the other way around?

they had corrected, it can both way

Link | Posted on Jul 9, 2015 at 02:12 UTC
On article Canon introduces 430EX III-RT Speedlite (100 comments in total)

can you tell me any reason to purchase e3-rt over this??

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2015 at 17:48 UTC as 18th comment | 4 replies
On article Canon introduces 430EX III-RT Speedlite (100 comments in total)
In reply to:

Lawrencew: Will we now start to see future Canon cameras with wireless transmitters built in, as well as the existing optical transmitter? Otherwise, another £200+ for a ST-E3-RT transmitter makes it an expensive 'system'.

Perhaps a feature of the coming 6D and 5D replacements?

Apart from that, its good to see the price hasn't increased over the current 430 (discounts aside). It may be more expensive than clones but IME it will be super reliable, and totally compatible with Canon products across the years.

I agree that it is expensive, however I dont see any rival yet, may be yongnuo with lower built quality as I hear around

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2015 at 07:53 UTC
On article Canon introduces 430EX III-RT Speedlite (100 comments in total)

very good improvement espesially for any portrait photographer by anymean.. Now if they release E3-RT with assist lamp then this setup will be perfect

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2015 at 07:47 UTC as 28th comment
On article Canon warns about dangers of counterfeit camera gear (154 comments in total)
In reply to:

Elliot H: whether it be a name brand or phony, "manufacturing cost"
can't be more than 15. usd AT MOST

I will glad to purchase 10 from you errrrr may be 20

Link | Posted on Jul 3, 2015 at 08:05 UTC
On article Canon warns about dangers of counterfeit camera gear (154 comments in total)

Wow.. I already have three of them, let wish I dont have the fake one. Anyway, I never got trouble yet.

Link | Posted on Jul 3, 2015 at 03:23 UTC as 43rd comment
On article Moment announces 10x macro lens for iPhone (18 comments in total)

Without properly flash setup its hard to get good result even for 1:1 magnification with 100 mm macro lens on my apsc dslr. For not moving subject and with tripod maybe still can get a good one, however this setup will not pocketable and very limited purpose since we will block our own light due to very close distance to subject. So I think this lens not so usable one

Link | Posted on Jul 3, 2015 at 03:11 UTC as 5th comment

currently have 50 and 100 prime on apsc so it would be great for additional lens for my family portrait purpose. But not sure about weight

Link | Posted on Jun 22, 2015 at 02:23 UTC as 19th comment | 1 reply
On article A closer look at the Nikon Coolpix P900 megazoom (192 comments in total)
In reply to:

The Squire: OK, let me do the maths.

1/focal-length rule for shutter speed = 1/2000
5 stops of IS means I can hand hold at 1/60 and shoot at 2000mm.
Seriously?
Believe it when I see it.

for super focal length or super close like macro that calculation just not work

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2015 at 15:25 UTC
On article Fujifilm announces XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR lens (295 comments in total)
In reply to:

Conrad567: Metal construction. Weather sealed. Zooms to 84mm instead of 70mm while maintaining a constant 2.8 aperture all for less than 2/3 the price of the mighty Canon 24-70mm ii. (Which I own BTW) This also has a Filter thread of 77mm instead of the 82mm of the Canon. If it performs at least as good as the Canon or the FUJI 50-140mm then this lens will be a bargain.

It really seems to me that FUJI is trying to build professional type lenses in the hope of breaking into the fashion and wedding business. It will be interesting to see if it works. I have an X-T1 and 7 FUJI lenses. All of them are great lenses. Certainly expensive, at least when they are first released, but they do take a nice photo.

In what body did you put your 24-70 that makes it comparable to this new fuji's..???

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2015 at 15:15 UTC
In reply to:

DFPanno: What a laugh. Embarrassing really.

Everything is embarrassing until its done and success

Link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 16:35 UTC
Total: 28, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »