6400 that looks to good to be true. No, skin softening effect.
colors look good though.
Take a look at the Fuji X100s samples those were really bad too.
loud shutter sound... it out of my hands again. : )
Even if it were obsolete you can count on Fuji to provide firmware updates to keep you happy.
FF lens > APS-C equivalent
Zeiss FE 24-70mm f/4.0 OSS -> 16-47mm f/2.7Sony G 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 -> 18-47mm f/2.3-3.7Zeiss FE 35mm f/2.8 -> 23mm f/1.9Zeiss FE 55mm f/1.8 -> 37mm f/1.2Zeiss FE 70-200mm f/4.0 OSS -> 47-133mm f/2.7
That portrait shot is terrible. Yeah, lovely skin tones. lol
If I am not mistaken it's the same sensor as the OMD and that a great sensor but I won't expect anymore real big improvements to image quality. That said the images look great. Also, any real photographer will try to keep the ISO low as possible.
Pentax deserves a gold for these cameras.
This is great, more or less the same sensor used in 7 of their other cameras. Way to Canon. : )
If you can tone done the color noise and reduce the sharpness on the OMD they would all four shown there look about the same. OMD is impressive.
Would love to see Pentax K5 IIs review it looks better to me than the Nikon.
Robert Garcia NYC: hmm, the Pentax K5 IIs actually has better image quality that the Fuji.
you're still novice, lol. Plasnu, not a single picture in your gallery go figure and are you blind? Get your yourself some glasses and take another look at raw samples novice.
Rage Joe: Phenomenal High ISO image quality. Fuji is just in its own class in this.
You should compare with the Pentax K5 IIs and then get back to me particularly the raws.
hmm, the Pentax K5 IIs actually has better image quality that the Fuji.
Pentax K-5IIs, would love to see that review one day...
That CEO needs to step down and put that damn G2X out already I want one. GET BACK IN THE GAME CANON.
I think these are good image with good color and sharpness.
Wow, they killed it. Great job. Surprise me with some great affordable lens though.