Lives in United States Dallas, United States
Works as a Banking/Finance
Has a website at
Joined on Oct 24, 2005


Total: 95, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

snapa: Now, if they can only update the 3.5 year old sensor, they will really have something worthy of consideration. Changing body material, colors, firmware updates is nice, but... a new improved sensor would be even better, IMHO.

The E-M1 replacement is most likely where we will see that. That's what I'm waiting for.....besides the 7-14/2.8 I just pre-ordered.

Direct link | Posted on May 12, 2015 at 13:32 UTC

Selfie- What a stupid word and this is one stupid idea.

Direct link | Posted on May 4, 2015 at 11:43 UTC as 49th comment

Nice article. Thanks, now for the fun part. Reading the geek responses to get even more technical because they can't help themselves...

Direct link | Posted on Apr 27, 2015 at 16:49 UTC as 176th comment
On Opinion: Why the Canon XC10 is a big deal article (810 comments in total)

I've had cameras with built-in moving modes now for 7 years and have shot, maybe, 5 minutes worth of video, and that was just playing around, so no, this product holds zero interest for me.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2015 at 11:37 UTC as 115th comment | 1 reply

I do not even like a 28mm equivalent as my widest option, so why would I want even less? I wouldn't buy either of these lenses, but certainly not the Tamron.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 6, 2015 at 12:22 UTC as 57th comment | 5 replies
On Algernon in the -Domestic Cats- (Full Colours Only + Border) challenge (1 comment in total)

Great entry! Love the angle and expression.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 14:19 UTC as 1st comment
On Jeffy in the -Domestic Cats- (Full Colours Only + Border) challenge (3 comments in total)


Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 14:18 UTC as 1st comment

These were some of the cheesiest-looking cameras I've ever seen. They should have shut it down, and banned all the "designers" from ever working in a camera factory again. Stuff like this should never see the light of day again.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 13, 2014 at 13:45 UTC as 24th comment
On A second glance: two takes on the Leica X article (399 comments in total)

Nothing here is going to sell many of these.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2014 at 04:48 UTC as 115th comment
On Apple iPhone 6 Plus camera review post (205 comments in total)

Better than the crappy Kodak Instamatic mom and dad used in the early 70's, but not something I'd use to shoot my vacation pics today. Great for recording the sign in the airport parking garage though so I remember where I parked.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2014 at 16:30 UTC as 50th comment | 3 replies

24mm equivalent view is not wide enough and I want something wider (and longer) that's better than a crappy add-on converter.

Buy 3-4 generations of LX100's with lenses you have to throw away each time you upgrade and you've bought the equivalent of an interchangeable lens body and 3 good quality zoom lenses that cover more range and you get to keep with each new generation body.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2014 at 20:10 UTC as 84th comment | 4 replies

"wee need to create more lenses"....

Tell us all something we don't already know....

Direct link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 15:15 UTC as 28th comment
On Hands-on with Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 article (441 comments in total)
In reply to:

axlotl: I have read elsewhere that the lens has 5 aspheric elements with a total of 8 aspheric surfaces.

Yep, they're bending the heck out of the light to make the lens as small as possible and still cover the area of the sensor they are using.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 21, 2014 at 05:10 UTC
On Fujifilm announces weather-resistant XF 50-140mm F2.8 article (224 comments in total)
In reply to:

KGP: Lets face it... mirrorless size/weight advantage applies only when prime lenses combined with these bodies. There is no way to skip the law of physic & optics... the larger the sensor the biggest the optical elements, the fastest the aperture the heavier the glass. So simple. This lens is a nice addition to Fuji's line up, im pretty sure its gonna kick ass !

This is definitely where any size convenience of mirrorless ends. You really need to go to smaller sensored cameras for a lens this speed to be decently-enough smaller. At this size, choosing DSLR or mirrorless is a matter of optical or electronic finder preference, not size.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2014 at 12:32 UTC
On Sony announces Alpha a5100 compact mirrorless camera article (104 comments in total)

Never mind.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 18, 2014 at 12:25 UTC as 12th comment
On Rare Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6L USM goes on sale in UK article (218 comments in total)

B&H did a video showing them using the used unit they had. Quite impressive how they were picking tiny subjects in the river from way off and filling the frame.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 15, 2014 at 16:03 UTC as 93rd comment

I thought I knew little about video. Now I know, I know nothing.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 4, 2014 at 15:15 UTC as 193rd comment
In reply to:

Danny: Say NO(!) to CC software. You know why.

+2. This is my hobby and Photoshop is the product I like best. The reality is, I've been paying pretty much the same thing since Photoshop CS with each 18 month Photoshop upgrade at $180-$195. Whether it's $180-$195 once every 18 months or $10.81 per month, I care not.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 11, 2014 at 18:58 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review preview (2079 comments in total)
In reply to:

vaclav1: There is something missing in the review about auto focus and shutter lag in the real life:

Good follow-up to add to this review of the E-M1 from several months ago. It's still an excellent mirrorless performer relative to newer cameras, like the GH4.

If I was still using a DSLR I'd never be in a position to afford a camera like the Nikon D4s, much less the better lenses you really need to add to the D4s to get the best possible performance out of it.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2014 at 15:56 UTC
On Sony a6000 Review preview (816 comments in total)
In reply to:

midimid: Wait - 'there's no real portrait prime' on E-mount? Isn't there a 50mm 1.8 from the original lineup? And a 55mm 1.8 on FE?

Sony is just short on NEX system lenses, period. At this point, they've probably created more NEX/A6000 body models than dedicated lenses to fit them. In that respect, even Samsung has done a better job.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2014 at 12:46 UTC
Total: 95, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »