These are great cameras, but if you're lucky you can find the good 'old' Olympus E-M10 with BOTH the 14-42mm and 40-150mm dual lens kit for less than that.
It's a very, VERY good starters kit. Good EVF, touchy-flippy screen, superb IBIS, superb sensor, advanced controls, and instantly fast AF, etc. etc.
TheDarmok74: The last Moto G was no slouch either photo-wise but with this generation, even the camera module does not justify spending 600$ on a phone for most everyone.Really a nice direction this is taking.I hope the next generation will have IOS.
Sure. That would have been acceptable.
That does make more sense.
But i don't think you realize how popular >€600 phones are. Otherwise they wouldn't keep on making so many of them would they.
"does not justify spending 600$ on a phone"You mean This phone.
"I hope the next generation will have IOS."What are you smoking?
barrym1966: So it's smaller and more expensive than the lowepro ?
Well you know what they say - everything's betteron the flipside.
Confused of Malvern: Oh, you mean it's a video containing an overview of the K1. I thought it was going to be an overview of the K1's video capabilities. Misleading title!
I feel so mislead.
These feels ..
.. cannot handle the feels.
Holscen: If the pro version was $20 they'd sell 10 times as many, and 100 times as many if it was $2, but $99 for a plugin isn't going to sell well and I suspect it will not give them much of a return on investment.
Not only would they sell a 100 times more. That would also makes them 100 times more popular by definition. Which might be even more valuable than the sales alone.
Denis the Menace: Sounds like another desperate ploy to try to get more users to their cloud. No thanks.
Hey we'd probably all agree with you, it's just that THIS ISN'T ADOBE. Which i think you are still not realizing? Or is there something else you're trying to say, are they undercover in this ghost company?
Dude its a PLUGIN, they call themselves BEAMR.
Did you even read a single sentence?
alcaher: Im gointo to buy the d500 but i also want so badly the K-1, Forget about those digital medium format big boxes.
This two cameras are going to be the best two dslrs of 2016.
Good one. And you think the 5D4 will be the one where Canon suddenly starts innovating because?
M Jesper: Had a toploader type bag like this once, it was beautiful.Then i bought a bunch of primes. Never used it again. :-(
That's what i'm saying, it turned out to be useless when you get even a little serious. :-)
But it was my first camera bag, so it saddens me that i didn't get to use it much.
RStyga: Another camera bag like the others; and the news are...?
You need a mindshift.
Had a toploader type bag like this once, it was beautiful.Then i bought a bunch of primes. Never used it again. :-(
pew pew: I,m kinda a sony fanboy, but I was under the impression that in the compact category the pana lx 100 was the best for video
giuliomagnifico: It should (from Leica website) use a very quite, almost not audible, shutter...I'm very curious to hear it =]Anyway it could have been a black and white only camera, much more cool and fashion!
Also, there is this official (10min) promo video:
Exploring Porto with the Leica M-Dhttps://vimeo.com/164548974
Should be the same as the previous M262:https://youtu.be/R2RIz5xtxdI
The quietest digital M so far. And notice that horrid sound of the M-E in comparison. The M240 i believe is very close to the M262 sound.
saeba77: image the same quality sensor and similar AF in a mirrorless body as the A6xxx.Damn if only Nikon making that not cannibalize his own market:(
That doesn't cannibalize anything. Just a good sensor in a mirrorless body.
Tungsten Nordstein: 'Nikon's *freshly-revived* flagship APS-C line'
you make it sound bad - like it was on the verge of expiring or something.
Nah don't worry, just leading another fleet.
onlooker: So without the LCD we should save a bit on body thickness, and also on weight (glass + electronics). Right? Well, let's see:
Leica M-D:Dimensions: 139 x 80 x 42 mmWeight: 690 g
Leica M:Dimensions: 139 x 80 x 42 mmWeight: 680 g
This is perplexing. What is the gain here?
It's a typo or wrong info. The M-D and M (Typ 240) are both listed as 680g, where the M (Typ 262) is only 600g. The difference is in the top plate being aluminum in the latter, but heavy brass in the M-D and M240.
A display and a few buttons weigh almost nothing, but not even 1 gram of difference seems strange. The M-D is the only one that mentions the weight being with battery in the Technical Data, but i don't think they would change that all of a sudden. I'm sure there's some other reason.