Lives in United States United States
Joined on Mar 9, 2010


Total: 36, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Otus Readings: the Zeiss 85 F1.4 Otus Comparison article (223 comments in total)

"Moore's progress has been slowing down a bit in the computing world."

Was the use of "bit" in reference to Moore's Law intentionally humorous?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 1, 2015 at 09:16 UTC as 14th comment
In reply to:

Glen K Wells: I have a NEX-7 for sale with some gold glitter glued on and a tinsel strap, anyone willing to give me £6500

Look the king is wearing no clothes!?!

Why so cheap? Is anything wrong with it?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2015 at 09:00 UTC
On Manfrotto launches XPRO Ball Head article (30 comments in total)
In reply to:

Drazen Stojcic Buntovnik: One more vote for Really Right Stuff. Expensive, but worth every single penny. I'd never go back to Manfrotto when it comes to ball heads.

Manfrotto for ballheads is a bad choice. I bought a head for around $200 and soon after realized I should have spent a few more dollars on a RRS head. Live and learn, I guess.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2015 at 08:55 UTC
In reply to:

jhinkey: Sorry, no sympathy to the photographer. Don't like it, don't sign the contract.
Don't like these kind of contracts, form a union and boycott Ms. Swift, but don't whine.
What happened between Apple/Swift has no relation to the disagreement that this photographer has with Swift. He's just using the Apple/Swift coverage to promote his unhappiness with the contract he signed.

If you read it, you'd know the photog was not spot on, and her management responded and corrected the falsehoods he made. I hope you can read. The photog is using this to further his own agenda.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2015 at 08:53 UTC
On Canon drops prices on 31 high-end L lenses article (58 comments in total)
In reply to:

riveredger: It's funny that some of these lenses are priced higher than motorcycles. I mean, really!?

Somebody skipped cost accounting ^^^

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2015 at 07:09 UTC
On Tamron15-30_DSC_0071_ISO64_1_15s-F8 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)

I was expecting Multnomah Falls!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2015 at 23:55 UTC as 2nd comment | 2 replies
On photo in sample gallery (4 comments in total)

I was expecting Multnomah Falls!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2015 at 23:55 UTC as 2nd comment | 2 replies

I bought a Benro B3 Ballhead. I wish I hadn't bought it. I'll do more research next time....

Direct link | Posted on Apr 8, 2015 at 04:35 UTC as 20th comment
On Go wide! Hands-on with Canon's 11-24mm F4 L article (229 comments in total)

I thought the lens was large until I saw the price. It had better be the most magnificent piece of glass in that focal range by a decent margin.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 05:04 UTC as 10th comment
On Canon EOS-1D C sees $4000 price drop in North America article (250 comments in total)
In reply to:

razadaz: Its price drops like these that put me off investing in any expensive camera. I know of no other manufacturing business where prices drop continuously after a product is launched. Even software companies like Adobe (where development cost is high but the production cost is zero) don’t drop their prices like this.

PicOne, it's not their fault they don't understand the concept of "investment" or "investing"....

A purchase is not an investment. Investment assumes a return that exceeds the value of the purchase price of an item, with the time-value of money factored in. Your camera will mostly likely not appreciate, unless you're really famous.

Please stop saying investment when you mean something totally different.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 2, 2015 at 06:44 UTC

Their Warranty Expense account just grew a bit.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 8, 2014 at 04:30 UTC as 5th comment
In reply to:

bobbarber: I wonder if people will post about the "affordable" price of FF on this thread. I'm sure the 400 2.8 is an awesome lens, but 12 grand? Really?

For these reasons it's apparent both of you don't understand business and never will.

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2014 at 14:42 UTC
In reply to:

a1strank: Put the 1" RX100 sensor in that thing and just take my money

Why mot medium format?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2014 at 04:22 UTC
In reply to:

Jogger: I dont think DPR should be covering pro-cine equipment. Just leave that to EOSHD or dvuser.

I enjoy looking at these items and if DPR does it, I don't need to go elsewhere.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 2, 2014 at 13:58 UTC
On Zeiss announces Compact Zoom CZ.2 15-30mm T2.9 lens article (62 comments in total)

can i put this on a d3000 for taking cat pics?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 28, 2014 at 19:04 UTC as 3rd comment
On Nikon to offer D600 replacements if 'spots' continue article (175 comments in total)
In reply to:

Benarm: Better late than never, but the Nikon's respect has been tarnished.


Direct link | Posted on Mar 28, 2014 at 18:17 UTC

This lens needs to be in its own category. This is very very impressive by the sharpness only.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 1, 2014 at 02:15 UTC as 52nd comment

More like US Patent Troll.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2013 at 17:23 UTC as 50th comment | 3 replies
On Olympus announces Stylus XZ-10 enthusiast compact article (198 comments in total)
In reply to:

GeraldW: Hey Timm, lighten up. There are a few 1/2.3" sensor cameras around that do quite well up to ISO 800, and with the fast lens, that will seldom be needed. What cameras? Panasonic FZ150, FZ200, and ZS15, Canon SX230HS, SD4000IS, Pentax Q.

The Sony RX100 as a competitor isn't valid, as the street price in the USA will be 2:1. It won't sell unless it's under $300. The Canon S110 is valid as a competitor, and Olympus would seem to have chosen a faster lens to offset the larger sensor; but slower lens, of the S110. At full zoom, the XZ10 has a 2 stop advantage.

As far as DOF control, I think it's funny that what was considered a drawback 50 years ago is now touted as a feature. I started as a serious hobbyist in 1955, and somewhere along the way, "selective focus" became a new way to compose. For many situations, a large DOF is an advantage.

This camera is obviously not for you, and maybe not for me (I have an S90 and a G15); but I can see a number of valid uses for it.


I think you meant "couldn't care less". If you could "care less", it wouldn't be so bad. Your message is unclear due to your failure in provide a clear statement. I can only guess what you meant.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 30, 2013 at 18:41 UTC

Bit rate is measured in Mbps. The usage of mbps is improper.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 1, 2012 at 16:17 UTC as 12th comment | 1 reply
Total: 36, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »