Takahashi

My mistake, it's 11 years old, but my point still stands; it's archaic, and XP64 was a disaster, and with most systems in the last few years coming with 4GB+ RAM, it makes sense to use a 64 bit OS....

Damn you Adobe, for turning your back on a 13 year old OS that simply cannot utilise modern software or hardware to the best of their abilities!

/sigh...

Hint : It isn't Adobe who are at fault...

/sigh...

"Memory space of XP"?!? What does that even mean? Using Win7 on any given system built in the last 5 years will very likely give better performance and stability over the same system running XP,...

Yep, when we first received pre-release versions of 7 from MS, I installed it on the first system in our workshop that didn't have any OS on it, and it ran exceptionally well. Considering it was an...

Wrong, and those percentage numbers have been pulled out of a dark, dank place. On which planet? Oh look, more wrongness. Where are you getting this info?!?

lol... it does, doesn't it? First time we saw it on a client's PC, the first thought was, "Whoa... crapware!". :D Another Malwarebytes fan here btw... not the full resident-sentry version, but...

I had a whole lot of words stored up in response to this bile, but I decided to do the right thing and ignore it, and you. Bye... enjoy yourself.

DUMB4SS, even on a skim-read of this thread it seems quite obvious that you are indeed "missing the point"; of the replies that clearly detail the fact that your problem lies with 32 bit / 64 bit...

lol... same here. :D XP, you were great, but your time has come.

Sorry Tom, but you're diggin' a hole here. XP, as good as it was (mostly...) is now verging on ancient, in OS terms. By all means keep an old system with XP churning away on it if you must, but...

Err... I'm struggling to figure how moving to Mac (and having to reinstall all your progs) would be any easier than installing a fresh Win7, and reinstalling all your progs?

A $2300 kit lens?!? Wouldn't that put the 5DmkIII kit in the $5000 - £6000 bracket?

M Jesper, agreed. As much as the OP should have used quote marks, some folks need to take a course in interpretation. :)

Paul, I found this (limited) test, but the tester seems unconvinced of any marked improvement between the mkII and mkIII...

Paul, I found this (limited) test, but the tester seems unconvinced of any marked improvement between the mkII and mkIII...

Thank you very much for this.

No, but you /are/ exceptionally arrogant, unpleasant and opinionated! Enjoy yourself, as you already seem to do.

Irrelevant. Adams' shots probably took hours each to setup. He shot B&W in an age when film & processing chemicals would've been expensive and hard to come by. Even so, and regardless of the esteem...

Speak for yourself... :-/