I keep seeing the canned reviews that are just the retoric from the manufacturer. It is so absurd that a camera is reviewed as good or excellent and then in the CON's it states it has soft images. If the camera produces soft images how is it good? I thought the camera was to capture images not see how much BS you can pack into a tiny box. I would like to see actual photos taken with the various cameras at different ISO's. It seem like all you get are reviews of the DSLR's. Why not reviews of all those superzooms that people are buying? Before buying it would be nice to to see shots from the Canon SX40HS, Panasonic DMC-FZ150, Sony HX100V and the Fujifilm HS20. Then perhaps one could make a decision based on photos not hype.