|
|
ambercool
Lives in
Works as a
Photographer
Has a website at
http://www.ambercool.com
Joined on
Aug 18, 2008
|
ambercool: It's funny how there are a lot of you guys who talk a lot of talk, but have no professional link, no professional photos, no professional e-mail, or even work experience. If there was an Olympic gold for that(trash talk) there would be massive ties for first place across the board. LOL
I bet if a lot of you were given an AE-1 with 400-1600ASA film, you would be utterly disappointed by enlightenment alone.
Mouhtaropoulos earned his spot, and I'm sure he's enjoying himself while more ignorance is spread and ignored.
IZO100, it's a good thing you don't make any kind of living from photography.
It's funny how there are a lot of you guys who talk a lot of talk, but have no professional link, no professional photos, no professional e-mail, or even work experience. If there was an Olympic gold for that(trash talk) there would be massive ties for first place across the board. LOL
I bet if a lot of you were given an AE-1 with 400-1600ASA film, you would be utterly disappointed by enlightenment alone.
Mouhtaropoulos earned his spot, and I'm sure he's enjoying himself while more ignorance is spread and ignored.
It's so funny some of the negative comments in this article. Do you remember back when the only thing that most people could afford was a roll of film? And when one wanted to take a candid shot there wasn't even an option to 'flash fill'.
So technical if he's going for that 35mm camera with no accessories he got it right. Artistically, he's always right.
Come on people. I really don't understand some of the comments made by what's technical. You could argue what's technical now might x+y=z, but if he wants the technical look where there was only x then what's the problem?
One important reminder for film studies; overexposure is not wrong. And in art nothing is wrong. Plus, he said "fashionable". Care to argue with anyone on what's "fashionable"? Seriously, do you guys listen to what you say?