maybe it was for the same reason why i paid for the 24 mm 1.4
the first thing that came to my mind was ...how are those leica m9s etc gonna cope up with this... its like 1/4 of the price and manual focusing on sony's peak focusing is just sweet...
Leon Lusignan: Sony's sensors s.ks again. I tried them both bad colors with bad corners and smearing.Only 2 ff sensors on market from D4 Nikon's and 6D from Canon's.In crops world Fuji is real one. You can see by yourself Kernocks test here:http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/comparisons/2013-12-leica-sony-canon/index.htm
ken says..iphone 5 dynamic range and tone ...soemthing along those lines, are better than any dlsr.....now...what was it ur referring to again...
Ben Raven: DPReview: Just a wee suggestion:
How about adding the D800E !!!
The Sony A7's just came out, and you've already got both of 'em on, as well you should -- but still NO D800E.
I, and I'm sure many others, would like to be able to compare the A7r with it's sister-sensor D800E . . . for all the far more than obvious reasons !!(as well as comparing the D800E to any other cam, of course)
Get on it, already ! What are you waiting for ?
hmm lets do the Sigma SD1 or even DP....well i guess that will kinda blow off the competition at low iso...
its hard to replace the iphone for casual shots. i bring around my ep5, have a d4 and i would use the exact tool for the types of shoot i want. Portraits outdoor would be d4 with the 85 and 24 1.4 lens. General high quality photos for tours would be the Ep5. But often the iphone is used for many candid and fast shots , love the new 5s multi shots.
The quality image from the iphone 5(s) is very usable for facebooks and such. The small sensor makes it crap for isolating portraits except for macro stuffs. The ease of use, IOS 7 photo streams sharing and non laggy response makes its my choice of "with me" for any non assignment. imho, android..(flame!) has a long way to go, no matter what spec they put out, the general ease of use and package just dont cut it.
Dan Wagner: Since I started as a pro photographer I often said that if magazines don't want to pay a reasonable amount for photography they should just publish without photos and see how that works. Also, it's always annoyed me that photographers get an inferior credit to writers, and especially those mags that bury the photo credit in the gutter. I don't diminish writers at all, and believe photos and words together are best.
they did line up for iphone...
panasonic, or (X) manufacturer.
Lets just release a really retro camera with 2 simple mode :
A)1. auto (and just set to auto scene dont even ask)or2. full physical solid dials for : shutter, iso and Aperture.
B)Instead of SD cards. Provide a side hollow compartment (where films are usually stored) and allow plugin of USB thumb/pen drive.
C)2 connectors :-1 ) connect to android2) connect to iphone
Forget the filters. forget the wifi. Forget whatever that is not needed.
Then just stop producing cameras for 2 years.
cmvsm: Looks great. Smart phones are getting very close to regular digital camera quality for travel photography. I see more and more people wondering why they are lugging their DSLR's around. You may not get the same DOF or low light performance that you get with a DSLR, but the compact trade off can be worth it.
photography is about light....subtracting stuffs and other factors. DSLR with its bigger sensors, produces better shallow DOF, which helps in isolating subjects. This pleasant property would be impossible to match with smaller sensors. While i love using my iphone 5s, but when some important moments are expected, i always wished i brought the dslr along.
KonstantinosK: What a stupid idea. I don't think this will ever catch on with the general public. Who on their right mind would want to put something on their face without good reason? Most people would get rid of their optical spectacles if they could. It's funny that a company like Google would invest into something that's bound to be a sales flop. Are there any sales figures for this?
its ok, just tell me where to buy one.
unless that ring flash does something impressive to the lighting....i am afraid its DOA.
mcshan: It doesn't matter if it was faked or not...the important thing is the weak bokeh.
while hilarious...this has to be the epic comment of the year
having used android phones in my sony Acro S and also the Nokia 808. i still went and preferred the iphone.
The reason is that the overall usage is rock solid. Fast to shoot and supports shooting with the headset volume buttons, tons of 3rd party casing and tripod mounting and apps like Hipstamatic/Oggl.
Overall, for mobile photography, its the overall availability of it. Other phones often lags for no apparent reasons when invoking the camera apps lacks 3rd party accessories like mcam lens etc.
If i wanted the best quality, well, the e-p5 and the nikon d4 would fulfill my needs, but for an everyday "camera with me". Its the iphone.
if the room reflects the mind....
i doubt the multi focus like lytro is possible here....small sensor cant give much shallow depth of field anyway. perhaps the aim is to be super edof?
hmm nikon. my best camera is a nikon, the d4. my worst camera is also a nikon, the nikon 1, v1. love them , hate them. is this their latest innovation...
why not build it in malaysia?
Ivan Lietaert: I have the same feeling expressed by others: in this 'subtle', devient, fiendish way, this article suggests the iPhone is the only portable device that allows to take decent pictures - which is clearly untrue.
In your article all words with possitive connotation are about the iPhone, while all words with negative connotation (eg 'lacked'; 'high light clipping' etc) are in the paragraphs about smartphones.
Funny how you don't realise that in the long rung your biased apprauch undermines the credibility of the author AND of Connect and dpreview...
maybe its because u cannot find hipstamatic in other smart phones? i use the ipod 5th gen for the same reason....
George 53: I forgot to mention that one could use "Lensbaby" and create similar and even more interesting images at that time.
lensbaby is manual isnt it...that would be way too slow to focus in a wedding...
the images are real and touching.