jp1958

jp1958

Joined on Jan 6, 2012

Comments

Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2970 comments in total)
In reply to:

jp1958: The Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II produces better images.

Therefore, buy the Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 12, 2014 at 03:24 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2970 comments in total)

The Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II produces better images.

Direct link | Posted on May 31, 2014 at 01:48 UTC as 281st comment | 3 replies

Hilarious and she's cute!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 5, 2013 at 13:11 UTC as 49th comment

It's about time. Too late for me though. I have moved away from Manfrotto heads to Arca Swiss compatibles years ago. So, who's next to think Arca Swiss? Gitzo?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 26, 2013 at 16:42 UTC as 21st comment
In reply to:

ShutterbugDougG: Disappointed that there's no GPS and no articulating screen. (:-( I'll pay more money for these desirable features.

Canon should take note of these omissions.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 19, 2013 at 11:19 UTC
In reply to:

AbrasiveReducer: This grip looks fine but just out of curiosity, why would anyone pay $3000 for a 5D3 and then walk around with a camera strap that says "Canon 5D3"? Is this (a) free advertising for Canon, (b) so that other people can tell what camera you have, even in a crowd or (c) to remind you what camera is on your shoulder.

Just thread a Nikon strap onto the Canon. Who would know?

Direct link | Posted on May 30, 2013 at 02:40 UTC
On Hands-on with the AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/4G ED VR article (258 comments in total)

Hang on to your f/2.8 version. You will most likely miss the bokeh of the f/2.8.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 26, 2012 at 02:31 UTC as 42nd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Francis Carver: Seems like Canon is unveiling their new cameras at least once about every 4 months. This now is at least the 2nd time this year they had "launched" the EOS C500 $30,000-cam.

This is a 4K camera body, but not a 4K camcorder, because it cannot record in 4K, only output in 4K. You would also need a matching 4K recorder connected to it, therefore, before you can record 4K video. Unfortunately, those are in short supply, to say the least.

The barely 3x zoom range lenses are not much to write home about, either. Altogether, a very pricey package for capturing pseudo-4K videos. Canon just cannot seem to get the video part right with their latest products.

You are a troll.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 30, 2012 at 03:03 UTC

Usain boosting Nikon sales. There doesn't appear to be a Canon DSLR in sight.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 11, 2012 at 22:07 UTC as 26th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

jp1958: http://2.static.img-dpreview.com/files/news/1705465526/canon_EOS-M_with_70-200mm.jpg?v=1546

Can I hang the camera and EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM from the EOS-M's camera strap over my shoulder?

No need to upgrade to a Canon EOS 5D Mark III when the EOS-M will do the job.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2012 at 05:24 UTC

http://2.static.img-dpreview.com/files/news/1705465526/canon_EOS-M_with_70-200mm.jpg?v=1546

Can I hang the camera and EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM from the EOS-M's camera strap over my shoulder?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 22:43 UTC as 135th comment | 3 replies

This would be the inexpensive wedding camera. People will buy 3-4 of these and have a lens on each one and shoot with flash.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 20, 2012 at 00:30 UTC as 56th comment | 2 replies
On kiss in the K is for Kiss challenge (9 comments in total)

That's one hell of an expensive Louis Vuitton bag she's toting around. More expensive than the Nikon used to shoot the photo.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2012 at 04:54 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

jmaxx30: I'm somewhat confused. What is the primary difference between the F4 and the F2.8 (besides the obvious aperture)? Is the big reason for making and F4 to reduce the size and price?

At the time of introduction, the primary reason was for a lighter lens at $550 less than the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM. Also, the other advantage was the 4 stop Image Stablizer. The drawback was the reduction in bokeh at f/4.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 3, 2012 at 19:19 UTC
Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14