And I have still to wait for a FF compact: one that cheaper than Leica Q or RX1. I would be happy with a FF GR or FF X100 or a digital version of the Olympus XA, all below $2000 or lower. A7II sensor would be just fine.
There is nothing wrong with the camera, as in most cases I prefer OOC jpegs compared to the RAW output ones. There is something wrong wit the taste of the "post processor". At least compared to my taste. I am also a Nikon guy with different preferences (and color gamut).
If you are a well-paid pro with a high society clientele, this camera is a must buy. If you ask too much, you have to substantiate the costs for the client.
There is a need for an official explanation from Sony. The silence is over. Everything is out loud.
The price of these should be in line or cheaper than the Nikon 35mm 1.8G FX and the Nikon 50mm 1.4G FX. My estimation is $500 each. Higher price just cannot cut it. OK, they want some extra for VC. Extra $200? Neh!!
kadardr: A real world recension of A7RII, with some musing why is this such a camera you have to buy:http://blog.mingthein.com/2015/08/25/the-sony-a7r-ii-a7rii/
The SONY PR juggernaut works just fine; do not try to lay down in front of it.
A real world recension of A7RII, with some musing why is this such a camera you have to buy:http://blog.mingthein.com/2015/08/25/the-sony-a7r-ii-a7rii/
kadardr: Where is the NX1 review? This one is simply insignificant. And you say you are unbiased?
Sorry guys for my mistake. I actually meant the cheaper version of NX1 the NX500, which I want to buy. Nice chat though. Maybe I will buy a K-3 after this.
Where is the NX1 review? This one is simply insignificant. And you say you are unbiased?
X-T10 is an ugly duckling which will never grow to be a swan compared to X-T1. Neither of them is for raw shooters though.
In most of the images senior staff was watching the show projected in front of them. When the president arrives Cheney seems to take responsibility of a catchup. But no actions are seen, no orders are given to anyone, apparently no attempt to change the course of actions. Nothing at all. Were they totally paralyzed by the happenings? Cheney definitely seems very passive. So the next step would be to ask archives what actions were taken to mitigate the outcome. The series did not change my view that Cheney is a war criminal.
kadardr: Let us just imagine in addition to the 24-35/f2 another like 40-80mm/f2 and another say 100-200mm/f2.4, all full frame. Would you need those? Would you need anything else? (OK maybe macros)
Your dream would be way too heavy. Otherwise Sigma is OK with me.
Let us just imagine in addition to the 24-35/f2 another like 40-80mm/f2 and another say 100-200mm/f2.4, all full frame. Would you need those? Would you need anything else? (OK maybe macros)
The right size with the right features and a very good form.Who could ask for anything more? Well, OK, the price. That is high, not very much though.
The Silver Nemesis: Memo to Canon 5Ds / 5DsR users (other than DPR staff): if there is anyone out there that has one of these cameras, please express your informed point of view. So, what you were able to do and you were satisfied and in which situations your photographic skills were handicaped by the camera?All other pows are valid, but just bla bla - because real life experience correlation (e.g.: I used this during a wedding... / a landscape photo session... / etc) with test findings (DPR) is absent. IMHO you cannot judge a camera from a single perspective. Brian (TDP) and the French (Cd'I / RP) are offering good perspectives, but I feel this is not enough as well.P. S.: I tend to take any opinion here with a grain of salt, due to ferocious "brand vs brand" battles I see. I don't know who's who, who earns money from any camera maker and who's not. So, if you can offer some unbiased real life experience please do it - I am pretty curious now about the DSLR world...
There is a "real world review" of 5DsR:http://blog.mingthein.com/2015/07/02/canon-5dsr-review-part-1/ part 2 is upcoming
Above iso 400 there is practically no difference in DR. If you want to exploit all DR capability of Nikon D810, you have to stick with iso64-100 or 200 maximum. Thus your shooting envelope will be pretty limited and the DR advantage highly situational for the highest DR images. To exploit highest DR will be a precision work with both Nikon and Canon.
Jennyhappy2: What exactly were you expecting?
This is high-precision shooting. Hard work no fun. I imagine it was being done in Liveview with a Zacuto or similar.
If you wanna carry the weight carry the weight. This is an image product for the buyer and for Sigma two. For those whom the gear is more important. For those who really want to buy it the good news is it can be sold only significantly below the price of 24-70/2.8 zooms. Because the one stop advantage do not equalize the reach advantage.IMO.