CrunchyLens

CrunchyLens

Joined on Oct 5, 2011

Comments

Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8
In reply to:

New Guy Wanna Learn: Guys, how come this doesnt look like the one at canon rumours? That one on the right hand side looks so like a mean beast!

The one shown here looks just like 1 dx...

the CR one on the right hand side is a C500

Direct link | Posted on Apr 13, 2012 at 20:24 UTC
In reply to:

NigelMoore: The additional images appear to come from the Canon press kit, and that side-on image is identical to the one shown on CR, but the back certainly is not:
http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/04/canon-u-s-a-introduces-eos-1d-c-digital-slr-camera-featuring-4k-high-resolution-video-capture/

The CR image shows the 1D-C on the left and the C300 (or possibly a C500 press image/mockup) on the right

Direct link | Posted on Apr 13, 2012 at 10:22 UTC
On Canon EOS 5D Mark III studio samples published article (287 comments in total)

Until they fix the links (matter of minutes probably) go through here: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/studio-compare

Outstanding jpeg colours and the RAW is wonderful.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 28, 2012 at 13:13 UTC as 105th comment | 1 reply
On First Impressions: Using the Nikon D4 article (183 comments in total)
In reply to:

Aspenland: My comment is gone... guys, are you deleting things?

This needs addressing

Direct link | Posted on Mar 7, 2012 at 16:27 UTC
On NHK working on 8k video sensor capable of 120fps article (94 comments in total)

"You don't need that"

Claiming this is too much or a waste is akin to saying a photographer who shoots stuff to put on the web should just as well use a 2Mp stills camera. After all, what website would use images over 2MP? But that's missing the point entirely.

Why anyone would poo-poo progress is beyond me.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 24, 2012 at 13:09 UTC as 14th comment | 2 replies
On Nikon D800 and D800E 36MP full-frame DSLRs announced article (271 comments in total)

Pros: Everything

Cons: It's a Nikon and my glass isn't.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2012 at 10:28 UTC as 35th comment
On Tamron releases image-stabilized 24-70mm F2.8 zoom article (190 comments in total)
In reply to:

tkbslc: I see a lot of comments about price. Is it listed somewhere or is it all speculation?

Generally speaking Tamron, Sigma and Tokina price their "equivalent" (i.e. ones that have a 1st party counterpart) at a lower price point. By how much varies greatly, and there are exceptions (the sigma 50mm f/1.4 for example) and most of the time the lower price is deserving due to lower image quality indicative of the "you get what you pay for" lens ecosystem.

In this case I am more hopeful, and would happily purchase this over the 24-70 II if the IQ is up to snuff.

tl;dr: speculation.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2012 at 20:14 UTC
On Tamron releases image-stabilized 24-70mm F2.8 zoom article (190 comments in total)

I am so excited by this lens, ever since I saw the announce this morning on PR, however the headline says "releases". Totally got my hopes up DPR :(

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2012 at 19:48 UTC as 53rd comment
Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8