Let me order already :)
quote from the review "... when focusing manually with most Nikon SLRs you have to remember to set the aperture to F1.8 before entering live view, as they're incapable of adjusting the lens's diaphragm during viewing."
Definitely not true for Nikon cameras and lenses in general. Just tried it with my D800 and 85/1.4 and it works just fine adjusting the aperture in live view. It even works with old mechanical link aperture lenses (like the AF DC Nikkor 105/2)
Maybe it doesn't work with Sigma lenses, but that is then their incompatibility.
ArcaSwiss: What's film ?
@inFocus You mean the movies that are shot on digital cameras, processed in a 100% digital workflow and have plenty of CGI in the visual effects scenes which make up 80% of the movie? That kind of 'film'? :)
CFynn: So now we know. DPR editors read Nikon Rumors too
Sure, after you saw it in Nikon Rumors you started to do research. :)
utomo99: If it is retro style why it did not use AA Battery ?AA Battery easier to find everywhere
for the same reason cell phones don't use AA batteries. Lithium is 3 times smaller and lighter than AA at the same capacity. Electricity to recharge a battery is easier to find than a store that sells AA batteries.
skytripper: Instant photography is like instant coffee: Not too terrible if you've never tasted the real thing.
What is 'the real thing' in terms of photography?
Octane: I would visit 'connect' more often if there was actual journalism, not this. Once again, a quickly thrown together page using a subject that hopefully getting a discussion/controversy going, trying to generate some traffic here.
@chj There are several websites and blogs that cover the mobile device market with excellent articles.
I would visit 'connect' more often if there was actual journalism, not this. Once again, a quickly thrown together page using a subject that hopefully getting a discussion/controversy going, trying to generate some traffic here.
One slight problem I see is that all of these elements are made from synthetic dies and materials. While they are colorful, they are no what nature offers in terms of color. Yet the majority of subjects we photograph are nature and of course people (natural skin). A printed photo of a person is a very reduced representation of what real human skin is like in terms of colors, shades, how light gets broken, absorbed and reflected to create it's unique look.
Of course I'm aware it's impossible to have a real person be part of a test scene that has to be 100% constant over years. OTOH I know from owning about 20 different digital cameras over the years that some cameras produce wonderful looking photos from artificial colored scenes, they do poorly when it comes to resolving very fine differences in colors and shades which is key for natural looking scenes, especially when it comes to portraits (and landscapes).
Again, I don't really have a solution, but something to think about.
so many experts here that all know better how to run a large company. LOL
GPW: The market is swamped with to many DSLR in a manufactures lineup. Nikon for example has the D3100,D5100, D7000,D7100, in DX lineup. If Nikon had ONE enthusiast DX and ONE pro DX that satisfied the two classes, that would save a crap load of money right there. The technology is there to make ONE excellent enthusiast camera to satisfy everyone from the beginner(auto settings) to the advanced user(manual settings), eliminating the unnecessary saturation of the market. Same goes for pro DX.
Expert right here! LOL I'm sure you know better how to do business than Nikon.
hea: I remenber my uncles back in the late 60s, 70s, most people who bougth SLR/Rangefinders, both pro's and amateurs, expected to stay with the camera and lenses for 10-15 years, have no need to be upgrading every year or two.I bougth my first DSLR a D40 6 or 7 years ago, still is functioning well, I made an upgrading only recently, a D7100, in the mean time I had no need to upgrade, and I think I will maintain my D7100 for years, If not is broken accidentally.
Yeah that was 50 years ago. The world has changed.
As you say, you are not a professional any more so getting exactly the shot needed or required is not the top priority any more. The much more convenient way of shooting with smaller and simpler cameras makes more sense to you now. That makes sense. I'm exactly the same way. I'm a full time professional. When I work, 'convenience' is not the point. It's all about getting the shot right so I use my SLR and a lot of different lenses and lighting gear. Once I'm done with work and shoot just for fun I use my phone or maybe my compact. I think the same is true for enthusiastic amateurs. They want to get the shot right, they don't mind the extra size or weight when doing that. They love photography and love using their gear.
SeeRoy: Yeah, carrying a wire is one of the biggest problems encountered in mobile photography...
@sagephotographyDo cables magically not work in third world countries? And tell me, how much of a 'backup' is 32 gb? I don't even use 32 gb cards any more, only 64 and up. Last but not least, how do you think the battery of these have to be charged? Wireless? LOL
Octane: Kind of funny trying to make it sound like editorial and Gear Shop are separate and independent when they are run by the same upper management. Neither editorial not GS make big decisions anyways, both report to the exact same management.
The CEO doesn't know about it? :) OK, totally believe that.
But honestly, one way or another I don't think it's bad. As a store it doesn't really matter what gets good or not so good review, people are going to buy something. If not one camera or lens, it;s going to be the other one. And brand loyal people (which I think are a pretty large percentage) buy their brand anyways.
Kind of funny trying to make it sound like editorial and Gear Shop are separate and independent when they are run by the same upper management. Neither editorial not GS make big decisions anyways, both report to the exact same management.
wetsleet: Is there not a risk of alienating adveritisers, and so finding that profits made through GearShop are offset by advertising revenue lost. After all GS will be seen to have 'privileged' status, and can only really take sales away from existing advertisers, so lowering the value of advertising on DPR.
@Simon, your smart one liner replies are never a surprise, though.
timoteotresgatos: Have you read the terms and conditions on the page?I'm not signing up for this!
"..., I (hereinafter "Participant”) hereby grant to Nikon Inc., its parents and affiliates, and the representatives, employees, directors, officers, agents, licensees, successors and assigns of each of the foregoing (collectively, "Nikon”) the absolute, non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, fully paid-up, perpetual right, license and permission to publish, copy, post, distribute, reproduce, display and/or otherwise use the images and/or photographs uploaded by Participant..."
FreedomLover: No wonder it's all sliding with all the oil being systematically sprinkled on their sensors ...
Ignoring their customers and a bad image does have an influence on sales, after all, even if they still prefer to deny any problem.
FreestuffLover " ... Kimura says he expects the company's DSLR sales to support the loss of compact sales for 'several more years' until it ... "
Any more questions?
Did you actually read the article? Compact camera sales are down, not SLR. SLR sales (which includes the D600) are doing very well for Nikon, so well that it's going to support the losses in the compact camera sector.