Cipher

Cipher

Lives in Canada Winnipeg, Canada
Works as a Shooter
Joined on Oct 30, 2002
About me:

Nikon D700
Nikon D800
Olympus OM-D E-M5
Panasonic GF1
Panasonic G3

Comments

Total: 114, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

They really need to push mirrorless cameras as something a hipster would use.

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2015 at 21:35 UTC as 50th comment
On Fujifilm makes XF 90mm F2 R LM WR official article (136 comments in total)
In reply to:

Pandimonium: The compact lens advantage on mirrorless seems to disappear above 35mm.

@Pandimonium -"I was comparing focal length. Not FOV." Then why even bring this up? It's like saying that a foot is a foot. It's not like 90mm is going to be different between an APS-C to a Full Frame to M43.

Direct link | Posted on May 18, 2015 at 18:47 UTC
On Hands-on with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 article (495 comments in total)
In reply to:

PB47: Compliments to the hand model. She's always got the best nails. And this is one snazzy camera. Seems to be pretty good value.

She? Those are George Costanza's hands!!!

Direct link | Posted on May 18, 2015 at 13:44 UTC
On Fujifilm makes XF 90mm F2 R LM WR official article (136 comments in total)
In reply to:

Pandimonium: The compact lens advantage on mirrorless seems to disappear above 35mm.

@Pandimonium - You need to compare a Pentax 100mm f1.8 size...not a 77mm on APS-C. The Olympus 75mm gives 150mm FOV on a m43 body.

So the closest is:
Pentax-D FA 100mm f/2.8 (a APS-C lens).
63.5 diam x 81.3 mm length (2.5 x 3.2 in.) 340 g

M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 75mm 1:1.8 (a m43 lens)
64 mm Ø, 69 mm length (2.5x 2.7 in.) 305 g (10.8 oz)

On m43, a Panasonic 20mm is close to the Pentax 77mm on FF. But the Panasonic is a bit faster and waaaaaaaaaay smaller. 2.48 x 1.00" (63 x 25.5 mm) and 87g.

And this 100mm Pentax is an f2.8...make it a an f1.8 and it'll be even bigger. If you want 150mm f1.8 on a full frame...that'll be pretty massive. Sorry...but maybe in another universe where the laws of physics are different, you can't make the lense smaller.

Direct link | Posted on May 18, 2015 at 13:33 UTC
On Fujifilm makes XF 90mm F2 R LM WR official article (136 comments in total)
In reply to:

Pandimonium: The compact lens advantage on mirrorless seems to disappear above 35mm.

@Pandimonium - "The compact lens advantage on mirrorless seems to disappear above 35mm."

Unless you have a m43 system camera...which is also mirrorless...

Direct link | Posted on May 18, 2015 at 12:08 UTC
On Hands-on with new Olympus PRO 8mm and 7-14mm lenses article (285 comments in total)
In reply to:

King Penguin: So this Fisheye is larger and heavier than my FULL FRAME Nikkor 16mm AF 2.8D......mmmmm, the benefits of M43....LOL.

Sorry M43 guys, but facts are facts!

Comparing a F2.8 to a weather-sealed F1.8? Can you say FAIL?

Direct link | Posted on May 12, 2015 at 11:02 UTC

Looks like the bottom of a petri dish.

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2015 at 15:58 UTC as 51st comment
On Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 moves from roadmap to retailers article (228 comments in total)
In reply to:

OBI656: Fuji creates pretty good quality cams and lenses but they do not have sensor (film) ... Unfortunately. 36 mp and up is for Fiji just Science Fiction ...

Well, OBI656....you better tell all those wedding photographers using the 12 MP Nikon D700 to stop because they can only use those photos for tiny webpages and that they are required by law to print all their images to fit a billboard.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2015 at 21:21 UTC
On Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 moves from roadmap to retailers article (228 comments in total)
In reply to:

stevo23: Once again, Fuji and the lenses. This looks like a well thought out one.

Yes, Nikon and Canon and others can make a similar lens for $1000...but it would be made of a lot of plastic.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2015 at 20:21 UTC
On Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 moves from roadmap to retailers article (228 comments in total)
In reply to:

OBI656: Fuji creates pretty good quality cams and lenses but they do not have sensor (film) ... Unfortunately. 36 mp and up is for Fiji just Science Fiction ...

If you take the Fuji 16MP sensor and make it a full frame using the same sized pixels, you almost get 36MP. It doesn't take much science to do that. However, convincing people to buy all new lenses could be a problem.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2015 at 18:25 UTC
On Olympus Stylus Tough TG-4 to offer Raw capture article (148 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cane: Great, yet another mini sensor in a tough type camera. Wash, rinse, repeat.

If you want a bigger sensor, get the Nikon AW1

Direct link | Posted on Apr 13, 2015 at 13:58 UTC
On Olympus Stylus Tough TG-4 to offer Raw capture article (148 comments in total)
In reply to:

KonstantinosK: Wow. One wonders why it took them so many years to offer the obvious. If I was to buy again a camera in this class it would probably be this. Next, Olympus, please make a rugged version of the XZ-2.

This is the strategy of most camera makers. Never release a camera with every possible feature. If you did, there would be no reason to upgrade. So always keep features limited so that they can be added one at a time to ensure people upgrade.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 13, 2015 at 13:18 UTC
On Olympus Stylus Tough TG-4 to offer Raw capture article (148 comments in total)

Is the Aperture Priority still limited to 3 "steps" or is it like a normal camera?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 13, 2015 at 13:16 UTC as 26th comment | 1 reply
On Sony Alpha a7 II Review preview (831 comments in total)
In reply to:

jkokich: Forgive what may sound like a stupid question (there are those), but why is there shutter sound, at all? (Serious question, even if stupid).

Electronic Shutters have down sides. When the data is read from the sensor from top to bottom, the bottom pixels are exposed longer to light, so you get uneven exposure. There's also issues if you pan to keep the subject in the frame. You get this jello effect which distorts the shot.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 1, 2015 at 19:52 UTC
On Fujifilm X100T Review preview (671 comments in total)

Is it me or is the X100T a smidge sharper than the X100S? Could this be that maybe a different version of software (e.g. Lightroom) was used to process the X100T files than the X100S?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 25, 2015 at 19:20 UTC as 91st comment | 2 replies
On Olympus offers Stylus SH-2 with Raw support article (46 comments in total)

This needs an EVF and a tilt screen on it

Direct link | Posted on Mar 11, 2015 at 10:26 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply

I guess this is another way to sell cameras. Attract customers with massive zoom numbers!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 2, 2015 at 11:35 UTC as 46th comment
In reply to:

Marty4650: There seems to be a real disconnect between making an "affordable camera" for lenses that cost between $4,000 and $10,000.

I mean... why bother?

Can't the Leica lens owner afford a Leica camera?
If someone can't afford those lenses, they why would they buy this camera?

Did I miss the part where Konost was planning to create a few affordable lenses for their affordable camera?

I'd say Konost is solving a problem that doesn't exist. Perhaps they might have been better off creating an affordable rangefinder camera that uses Nikon F lenses?

Isn't the M-Mount patent expired? So other lens makers can make M-Mount freely...no? Also, the website mentions that other mounts will be coming. The development kit comes in M-Mount and F-mount. So I suspect that an F-Mount will be available.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 24, 2015 at 21:21 UTC

Canon should look at Fujifilm. Even though their cameras aren't the best at AF and need to use specific RAW converters to get the best result, they have a loyal following. IMHO, CSC are not about getting the best IQ. It's about enjoying photography. I know my E-M5 can't compete with my D700 & D800 IQ-wise. But it's the camera I want with me when I go on vacation or family dinners or just going out to do some casual shooting.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 20:36 UTC as 156th comment | 2 replies
On Canon EOS 5DS / SR First Impressions Review preview (3412 comments in total)
In reply to:

D 503: Dynamic range is irrelevant in a time when no one prints. This is a digital camera for the digital age. I have never printed with digital.

Ozturet, Yes, most DSLR sensors have more DR than most LCD monitirs are capable of displaying and defintely more than printers are capable of printing.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2015 at 21:18 UTC
Total: 114, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »