orion1983

orion1983

Joined on Oct 16, 2013

orion1983's recent activity

  • "Raw+Fine JPEG" can be used....SONY LISTEN!!

    It´s soooo useless to not be able to use this combination with the RX10!

  • Man, it really looks as if there are dozens of people out there that screen the web for posts about non-FF-focal lenghts displayed as FF-equivalents JUST to find an opportunity to repeat all this...

  • Man, it really looks as if there are dozens of people out there that screen the web for posts about non-FF-focal lenghts/apertures displayed as FF-equivalents/apertures JUST to find an opportunity...

  • In the wide angle space needle scenery, the trees in the mid-left are way too muddy with the RX10. And in the night scene on the mid-right, the building is also sooo much blurred with the RX10...

  • In the wide angle space needle scenery, the trees in the mid-left are way too muddy with the RX10. And in the night scene on the mid-right (horizon, before the trees appear), the building is also...

  • In the wide angle space needle scenery, the trees in the mid-left are way too muddy with the RX10. And in the night scene on the mid-right (horizon, before the trees appear), the building is also...

  • The Sony is NOT weather-sealed. If you ever had a real weather-sealed cam in your hands you would know what I mean. In addition, there is NO certificate of the RX10 that guarantees ANY weather...

  • The Sony is NOT weather-sealed. If you ever had a real weather-sealed cam in your hands you would know what I mean. In addition, there is NO certificate of the RX10 that guarantees ANY weather...

  • The Sony is NOT weather-sealed. If you ever had a real weather-sealed cam in your hands you would know what I mean. In addition, there is NO certificate of the RX10 that guarantees ANY weather...

  • sorry, wrong cam...mixed it up :D

  • WHY so often >f6 and iso250? However, way too watercolored and washed out contrasts (as with tigers white long hairs in its face). Either this is an inferior JPEG-Version in the pre-production...

  • why do you wonder to see differences between a 1" and a FF camera? to ALWAYS get the VERY best quality, one would have to get an FF, several primes, and many muscles to carry this and quick hands...

  • why do you wonder to see differences between a 1" and a FF camera? to ALWAYS get the VERY best quality, one would have to get an FF, several primes, and many muscles to carry this and quick hands...

  • why, WHY do you wonder to see differences between a 1" and a FF camera? to ALWAYS get the VERY best quality, one would have to get an FF, several primes, and many muscles to carry this and quick...

  • why, WHY do you wonder to see differences between a 1" and a FF camera? to ALWAYS get the VERY best quality, one would have to get an FF/MF, several primes, and many muscles to carry this and quick...

  • isn´t 1/16,000 enough? That is the same as Sony´s 1/2,000 with a 3 step ND filter..... or has the electronic shutter any disadvantages?

  • .

  • For the complete review in spe: please, add a few more macro shots close to the minimal focus distance at 24mm and 400mm equiv.

    BTW, what´s the closest focus distance at 400mm?

    up to now, base...

  • Ok, Richard.... Even more interested than in the sharpness, I am in the 2 blurred spots. Where did they originate from? As afterwards, there is no other shot to verify if it were sensor...

  • poppyik, such a photo could also be taken without glass in between, just let your side window dont and blindly push the button. and....not throwing my precious pics into this forum means not...

Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
orion1983 has not added any gear yet.
Total messages 1
Threads started 0
Last post 4 months ago
Total comments 81
Total likes 170
Last post 3 days ago
Total reviews 0
Entries 0
Votes cast 0
Photos uploaded 0