dbannerz71

dbannerz71

Lives in United States IL, United States
Works as a Mechanical Engineer
Joined on Jul 8, 2012

Comments

Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6
On An In-depth Discussion of M + Auto-ISO for Canon SLRs article (35 comments in total)
In reply to:

tomKphoto: Auto ISO is great for wedding work, but Canon's version still needs some work although the implementation on the 60D is better than on the earlier 7D. Hoping the 7D2 and 5D2 nail it perfectly.

1. Allow the full range of ISO settings to be used, with a user defined highest amount

2. In Av mode, pick 1 stop faster (than currently employed) shutter speed - preventing motion blur.

3. In Av mode, pick 1 stop slower when IS is employed.

They're close - 80% there

Well it's actually already implemented, it's called exposure compensation. 1. Use iso max setting to limit how high the auto is allowed to be selected. 2. Use exp comp -1, this will increase shutter speed 1stop. 3. Use exp comp +1, this will decrease shutter speed 1stop. So the way I see it, they're 100% there.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2012 at 02:43 UTC
On Preview:canon-eos-650d-rebel-t4i (274 comments in total)
In reply to:

Arn: In RAW ISO 1600 the 650D appears much softer than 600D and 550D but that doesn't seem to be the case in RAW ISO 800 and 3200 or JPG results. Perhaps there's some settings glitch in that RAW ISO 1600 pic.

Ya, the glitch is called misfocus.

Posted on Jul 18, 2012 at 03:01 UTC
On Preview:canon-eos-650d-rebel-t4i (274 comments in total)
In reply to:

Koulang: Dpreview please re-shot RAW file at ISO 1600. It looks out of focus here. If you compare the 650D between RAW and JPG at ISO 1600, you will see the JPG has more details and cleaner image.

Yes, I agree, I have a hard time believing the 650D is not at least the same (IQ). I think they should reshoot the whole thing and take a bit more care consideringing how these cameras are judged by these shot comparisons.

Posted on Jul 18, 2012 at 02:57 UTC
On Preview:canon-eos-650d-rebel-t4i (274 comments in total)
In reply to:

Koulang: Dpreview please re-shot RAW file at ISO 1600. It looks out of focus here. If you compare the 650D between RAW and JPG at ISO 1600, you will see the JPG has more details and cleaner image.

Yes, I agree.

Posted on Jul 18, 2012 at 02:54 UTC
On Preview:canon-eos-650d-rebel-t4i (274 comments in total)

Please reshoot the 1600 ISO shot, it's out of focus.

Posted on Jul 18, 2012 at 02:53 UTC as 12th comment
On Preview:canon-eos-650d-rebel-t4i (274 comments in total)
In reply to:

Eric Glam: Studio shot at ISO 1600 RAW seems a bit out-of-focus. DPReview, please re-shoot.

Yes, I agree. Infact, it seams to me something is a bit odd about these test shots. I've seen much better on other review sites and given the significance that is placed on them, DPReview needs to go back and reshoot the set just to make sure everything was set correct and in focus (ie. NR low, standard or neutral style, whatever was set on the 600D etc.)

Posted on Jul 8, 2012 at 21:25 UTC
Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6