Franco8

Franco8

Joined on Nov 30, 2011

Comments

Total: 22, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Franco8: This will be awesome on a 4/3 camera hopefully it will happen

Sorry I meant the micro 4/3rds system

Direct link | Posted on Sep 22, 2014 at 00:19 UTC

This will be awesome on a 4/3 camera hopefully it will happen

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 01:09 UTC as 16th comment | 2 replies
On Nikon announces SB-500 Speedlight for stills and video article (26 comments in total)

When is Nikon going to release a wireless flash that does not rely on line of sight.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 00:23 UTC as 5th comment
On Nikon announces AF-S Nikkor 20mm f/1.8G ED article (73 comments in total)
In reply to:

photofan1986: Meh, I have a Panasonic 20 f1.7, it's even faster, and so much smaller and lighter, that they managed to make it a pancake. Come on, Nikon, give us the pancake version :D
Ps: That's humor ;-)

Dear photofan1986 the Panasonic 20mm f1.7 is only capable to project the image onto a 4/3 sensor. This Nikon lens is for a 35mm camera it is about four times the size.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 07:41 UTC
On What is equivalence and why should I care? article (2067 comments in total)

You call the Canon 1 Dx a full frame camera.
What do you call hasselblad Twice as Full camera.
I beleive the 4/3rds sensor on the Olympus is full of pixels.

Why dont you guys call it by the correct name a 35mm sensor

Direct link | Posted on Jul 9, 2014 at 06:18 UTC as 189th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

alcaher: $11.000 for the 400mm ??? and $2.600 for a 80-400???....

It good to know Tamron and Sigma exist !!

Also noticed you definately like playing with numbers

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2014 at 07:17 UTC
In reply to:

alcaher: $11.000 for the 400mm ??? and $2.600 for a 80-400???....

It good to know Tamron and Sigma exist !!

hi Alcaher if you cant tell the difference between these two lense. then you should purchase the cheaper one.

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2014 at 07:15 UTC
On Fujifilm X-T1 Review preview (587 comments in total)
In reply to:

lcolonezi: Nice camera, but no way this should be pricing like Sony A7... a full frame camera with amazing video...

Another moron that calls a 35mm camera as a full camera. It is half the size of a medium format camera

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 01:08 UTC
On Fujifilm X-T1 Review preview (587 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ramius: Camera body same as Sony A7, but not full format = Fail.

Hi Ramius If you claim that Sony produces a full format, then what do you call medium format Twice As Full or maybe large format Four Times As Full.
I dont recall ever having a glass of beer that is twice as full.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 01:02 UTC
On Mockups emerge of new Olympus OM-D 'OM-G' article (334 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jan Chelminski: DPR, you just magnified my already existing spring joy! I owe you one.
- OM-4ever

Edit: Well, in truth, it may have been some of the reactions below, that magnified my joy...

Hi Ben S. as per your comment, you have just anounced to the entire world that you are a fool for the entire month of April as opposed to some readers that are fools only in the morning of April 1st

Direct link | Posted on Apr 2, 2014 at 00:57 UTC

It's A SONY

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2014 at 01:04 UTC as 211th comment

Above states full frame sensor by Hasselblad awesome. I presume it is a 645 size sensor or have Hasselblad lowered there inteligence and call a 35mm sensor a full size sensor, witch is half the size of a medium format camera.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2014 at 00:53 UTC as 215th comment | 1 reply
On Happy Holidays from dpreview article (114 comments in total)

Happy Holidays. What happened to to Merry Christmas.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 29, 2013 at 03:29 UTC as 15th comment | 2 replies

Yes this may be the best quality lens on the market. Id prefer a second best lens with autofocus so I can capture that instant image. Focusing manually with no split prisim is slow and you either miss the shot or get it out of focus.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 06:55 UTC as 19th comment

all this C&%$P talk about aperture equiv. Bull S^$T who cares at the end of the day its manual focus only on a camera that has no split prism screen who cares. when are they going to release one that has auto focus

Direct link | Posted on Jul 8, 2013 at 08:22 UTC as 18th comment | 2 replies

"Its A Sony"

Direct link | Posted on Jun 20, 2013 at 12:15 UTC as 16th comment

Evidence that Sony must spend a fortune in advertising with this magazine.
A compact camera with a zoom the new Canon 1GX is a leap above any other camera
Olympus Pen series cameras, with Nikon Canon Pentax etc all have dust issues and they a shutter protecting the sensor, with Olympus the sensor is fully exposed yet they do not have that issue due to there patented dust reduction system. this is a leap in technology.
what about these new lenses on the market 18~200, 18~270 or 18~300 even though they are not pro lenses, they are pretty good quality, this would have been impossible to manufacture several years ago.
all the above should be above the Sony.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2012 at 02:05 UTC as 45th comment | 12 replies
On Nikon D4 overview article (844 comments in total)

With more pixels is it going have more noise over the D3s at high ISO.
I have my doughts. Who cares about pixie count, noise is what degrades the image quality.
Dunno if I should grab a D3s while I can or wait till I see true evidence
That the d4 has improved noise levels.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2012 at 04:38 UTC as 34th comment | 5 replies
On First full-res Fujifilm X-Pro1 images appear on the web article (216 comments in total)

Going by the samples supplied on how great this new camera is
I am not interested

Direct link | Posted on Feb 3, 2012 at 05:34 UTC as 9th comment
On Nikon announces SB-910 high-end Speedlight article (118 comments in total)
In reply to:

Poss: Can we get a PROPER firmware upgrade for the "old" SB900 now please?
And what's with the naming now... SB910... starting to sound like German WWII planes here...

Wait for the replacemant of the SB 900 it could be the SB 911

Direct link | Posted on Dec 2, 2011 at 01:12 UTC
Total: 22, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »