You call the Canon 1 Dx a full frame camera.What do you call hasselblad Twice as Full camera.I beleive the 4/3rds sensor on the Olympus is full of pixels.
Why dont you guys call it by the correct name a 35mm sensor
alcaher: $11.000 for the 400mm ??? and $2.600 for a 80-400???....
It good to know Tamron and Sigma exist !!
Also noticed you definately like playing with numbers
hi Alcaher if you cant tell the difference between these two lense. then you should purchase the cheaper one.
lcolonezi: Nice camera, but no way this should be pricing like Sony A7... a full frame camera with amazing video...
Another moron that calls a 35mm camera as a full camera. It is half the size of a medium format camera
Ramius: Camera body same as Sony A7, but not full format = Fail.
Hi Ramius If you claim that Sony produces a full format, then what do you call medium format Twice As Full or maybe large format Four Times As Full.I dont recall ever having a glass of beer that is twice as full.
Jan Chelminski: DPR, you just magnified my already existing spring joy! I owe you one.- OM-4ever
Edit: Well, in truth, it may have been some of the reactions below, that magnified my joy...
Hi Ben S. as per your comment, you have just anounced to the entire world that you are a fool for the entire month of April as opposed to some readers that are fools only in the morning of April 1st
It's A SONY
Above states full frame sensor by Hasselblad awesome. I presume it is a 645 size sensor or have Hasselblad lowered there inteligence and call a 35mm sensor a full size sensor, witch is half the size of a medium format camera.
Happy Holidays. What happened to to Merry Christmas.
Yes this may be the best quality lens on the market. Id prefer a second best lens with autofocus so I can capture that instant image. Focusing manually with no split prisim is slow and you either miss the shot or get it out of focus.
all this C&%$P talk about aperture equiv. Bull S^$T who cares at the end of the day its manual focus only on a camera that has no split prism screen who cares. when are they going to release one that has auto focus
"Its A Sony"
Evidence that Sony must spend a fortune in advertising with this magazine.A compact camera with a zoom the new Canon 1GX is a leap above any other cameraOlympus Pen series cameras, with Nikon Canon Pentax etc all have dust issues and they a shutter protecting the sensor, with Olympus the sensor is fully exposed yet they do not have that issue due to there patented dust reduction system. this is a leap in technology.what about these new lenses on the market 18~200, 18~270 or 18~300 even though they are not pro lenses, they are pretty good quality, this would have been impossible to manufacture several years ago.all the above should be above the Sony.
With more pixels is it going have more noise over the D3s at high ISO.I have my doughts. Who cares about pixie count, noise is what degrades the image quality.Dunno if I should grab a D3s while I can or wait till I see true evidenceThat the d4 has improved noise levels.
Going by the samples supplied on how great this new camera isI am not interested
Poss: Can we get a PROPER firmware upgrade for the "old" SB900 now please? And what's with the naming now... SB910... starting to sound like German WWII planes here...
Wait for the replacemant of the SB 900 it could be the SB 911
I would not hesitate to spend an extra $200 on top if it had a true radio control.Instead of line of sight. And order five of them.Why don't Nikon talk to photographers and ask what they want.
Cant see anything exciting why i should upgrade my four SB900.Why cant Nikon release a flash that does not require line of sightfor wireless control, i definately will trade in my current four flashes for the new ones,