"...Whats the difference between using this or just using a normal LED video light from say Yongnuo with 291 more LEDs and at the same time 12 times cheaper?And don't tell me the only difference is, that it "flashes" instead of being permanently on...."
You obviously know very little about high speed photography. Think light duration whether it be from the light source or from shutter duration. Both allow light to strike the sensor or film plane. 1/2M sec. shutters are not consumer available if at all. I suggest you bone up on photography basics.
chewdoggydog: These dummies with all the negative bs...sdaniella, if you are so damn smart, go work for NASA.
By chewdoggydog (6 hours ago)
"...These dummies with all the negative bs...sdaniella, if you are so damn smart, go work for NASA...."I did. At least for one of it's major contractors and for many years. So much for so called "negative bs".
Back in the good old days of rocket research, we used to rely on a high fps rate camera called a GSAP to study rocket engine firings. It's total running time was a matter of seconds. It cost a fortune then.
Now there may be one for less than $700? What possible use can an amateurphotographer have for such a device once he has taken a picture of a hummingbird in flight or a bullet shattering a light bulb? It's a marvelous achievement in price vs. performance, but it's long term use to the average photographer will be in bragging rights only.
Someone said he'd pick one up in a heart beat. And do what with it? Do you have any idea how quickly it will fill a 32GB card at 18.500 fps @ 2560 x 2048 pixels per image? I would imagine we are talking in terms of seconds.
It has a profound scientific future and I cheer for the inventor, but aside from that who in amateur photography needs it? Who will want one is another matter.
What a great idea. It is so obvious, but the ability to to precision manufacture the "film plane" or in this case, the sensor plane was not economically available previously.
Leica approached this concept with their M8 sensor which incorporated tilted lenses in front of the sensor to reduce edge distortion so that their standard M lenses could be used. But to curve the sensor and avoid extra compensating hardware is simplicity in design even though the manufacturing techniques to arrive at the solution must have been a real bear.
My hat is off to Sony and I'm sure that their customers will line up to incorporate this breakthrough in their many cameras. The obvious advantage will be in in lens design which will result in much lighter and simpler lenses. Of all of the "design breakthroughs" that have been issuing from camera companies for several years, this one is by far the greatest.
I would guess that it is less expensive in the long run.A casting would require machining to clean up surfaces and bring them into closer tolerance to assure precision fit for the components to be installed subsequently. So why not just design the body to be machined from a solid billet to begin with?
I am a happy user of a Fuji XPro-1 and an Olympus OM-D as well as Leica M's.
Leica is a hand manufactured, assembled and tested camera. Therefore, as compared to other excellent Japanese cameras like Fuji or Olympus which are mass produced, the price is going to be greater.
While I can't speak for these new Leica T lenses, Leica lenses typically have a certain character in the way they draw images. It can be seen in the contrast, the color, sharpness and bokeh that is best seen rather than objectively described. Does it result in a better image? There is a subject for discussion or argument.Do the images justify the price? To some, yes. To most consumers, probably not. But then Leica has never been for most consumers who run out an buy the latest version offered by the mass market.
Leica directs their products to a nitch market of professionals and hard core photographers who appreciate the quality build and long-lived ruggedness and who will continue to support their market.
This is a case of over-design. For my money, the best strap is one that is sized for the camera and user; i.e., no adjustment. One of the best straps I have used was one of the earliest sling straps made out of soft webbing with a simple ring that slides up and down the strap and attaches to a camera lug. The strap was hand made somewhere in VT and for all I know,they may be out of business.
The second best strap is another simple gem that I use on my Fuji XPro-1 made by Lance (http://lancecamerastraps.com/classic-non-adjust/).
It is simply a nylon woven line that does not adjust. You order it by length and color desired. It is nicely finished. Because of the large diameter of the nylon line, it is soft and comfortable and requires no shoulder pad. I carry it sling fashion while walking and around the neck while shooting. I have used Optech, Tamrac, Sun-Sniper, etc., and this Lance Strap beats them all.
Now, if someone would only make the perfect camera bag I'd be very happy.
"Chinese government orders Nikon to stop selling D600"
Says your friendly supplier of lead oxide baby teething ringsand your favorite brand of glow in the dark puppy meal.
Just as the Ford motor company will always be known for the Edsel, no matter what they did afterwards, Nikon will always be known for the D600. In fairness to Ford, the Edsel was an ok automobile with styling that misjudged market tastes. But the D600 will forever be known as living proof that Nikon really doesn't give a hoot about either it's customers or it's dealers.
For nearly 50 years I was a loyal Nikon customer and user. If I were just getting into serious photography today, I would avoid Nikon like the plague.
Light Pilgrim: same sensor again and again and again and again?
And a good thing it is, too.
I never change the focus point for a simple reason. Leaving it in the center means I always know where it is. If I moved it, I am likely to forget when I grab the next shot and possibly lose my shot. It is just as convenient and more reliable for me to quickly shift my camera to focus on the center of attention and shift quickly back to frame and shoot. That is what cameras did for many decades before the engineers decided to add what is in my opinion a totally useless feature. Some cameras, which I expect DPR would like better make focus point shift very easy and I find that occasionally, when using such a camera, I inadvertently shift the focus point and mess up the shot. So, I disagree with the reviewer in that respect.
plasnu: The ONLT thing that I don't like about this camera is: FUJIFIILM LOGO. It makes overall camera look somewhat cheap and strange... It should be a bit larger or just to be removed. Many people will use gaffer tape, anyway.
A very strange reply. It is right up there with comments made by Leica users that hate the red log. How is the Fujifilm logo any different than the logo of Nikon or Canon. It is a simple engraved company name and similarly placed on the front right below the "prism" hump. Would you feel differently if it said Canon, Nikon or Leica? Methinks there is more than a little snobbery showing through, unless I have miss-read you.
As a satisfied XPro-1 user, I think the X-T1 looks like a winner. I doubt that I'll buy one since I really love the hybrid OVF/EVF finder. If, however, Fuji brings out a successor to the XP-1 that incorporated the dial/function button configuration on the XT-1, I will be sorely tempted. The FujiX cameras with their traditional controls, very high build quality, lenses and Xtrans sensors are very hard to beat and IMO leave most of the competition, with the exception of the excellent OM-D camera by Olympus, very far behind. I own one of those, as well.
Too little and too late. I bought a Korean knockoff of the RRS grip for a lot less money. I would have bought the new Fuji grip even at the higher price because it looks right with the XPro-1 but, as I said, too little and really very late. The grip together with the Thumbs-up really makes this camera very comfortable to use.
I was prepared to be amazed until i saw shot #3. I could be wrong, but I suspect the bird image was dragged into the spider web image. I feel the same about the owl shot. As for the blue elephant, all animals, even elephants are entitled to their moods.
Nikon, like Fuji, finally realized that a camera designed by photographers rather than by bells and whistles marketeers still has a place in the market. My long gone F series Nikon's were all about taking pictures and putting as little as possible between the photographer and the final image. They were rugged and wonderful cameras. That is what drew me to the excellent FujiX Pro-1, a camera that requires very little referral to a menu to use it. It has a real shutter speed dial, a genuine aperture ring and a simply way to go from automatic to manual with the option to keep or lose autofocus without a lot of fuss. My old D70 and subsequent D300 were not as straightforward as they should have been.
Welcome back Nikon. You have been missed.
Jim Evidon: "....'Every six months I want to do something new' Kimio Maki of Sony...."
I think we now understand Sony's problem.
Although Sony makes cameras with exceptional IQ, their cameras are the most ergonomically unfriendly devices ever conceived by man. At least we now know who that man is.
That is why I got rid of my otherwise excellent NEX series camera in favor of another excellent camera that was obviously designed by photographers who understand cameras and how they should be designed. It's ironic that my new camera has the same excellent Sony sensor as my previous NEX series camera. Maybe Sony should stick to selling sensors and components to camera makers who understand camera design.
"....'Every six months I want to do something new' Kimio Maki of Sony...."
I've seen better images from an old Box Brownie. Cell phones are best kept to making phone calls and playing with apps.If you want to take photos and send them wireless, buy a cheapo camera with WiFi and knock yourself out.
Looks like a nice FF camera. Expensive, but that is what FF cameras are. Larger format = larger lenses=greater weight and bulk. Frankly, from a practical standpoint, FF is really needed only by professional and that group of amateur enthusiasts that are into pixel peeping. My three main cameras are a Leica M8 which format is larger than APSC but smaller than FF, FujiX Pro-1 (APSC format) and Olympus E-M5 (MFT format).
All three cameras produce prints that are brilliant up to 24" to 30". Since I am not a professional, my Epson R3000 printer is limited to 13" wide by whatever length I feed into it. If I had a 17" printer, all three cameras would still produce sterling high quality images.
So, I really can't gush over any FF camera because I have no use for the bulk, weight and expense that it comes with. So my hat is off to Sony for what looks to be a fine FF product, but it is of little use to most amateur enthusiast photographers except for the bragging rights that it comes with.