Lives in United Kingdom Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined on Jun 13, 2012


Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8

The portrait is beautiful, stunning light, would like to see hair down without the "wind" though.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 17, 2015 at 13:49 UTC as 9th comment
On Ghost Town: Shooting in Kolmanskop article (71 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mirrorless Crusader: These images are average quality. The composition is good but not great, the saturation levels are appropriate, but the white balance is blatantly and arbitrarily warm in many of the images. The lightingwas very poorly done in some of these images, especially #1 with the foreground being desperately needing flash and in some other images the flash was used inappropriately. Overall I would grade this a C+. I certainly could have done better with thousands of dollars worth of gear and enough money to spend all day taking pictures without having to work for a living.

Disagree with number 1 needing flash...The subject - the piece of wood / door. Is well lit. The sand doesn't require it IMO.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 20, 2014 at 07:23 UTC


Direct link | Posted on Aug 12, 2013 at 21:30 UTC as 43rd comment

Only problem is to the uneducated it looks like a fu**ing bomb!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 19, 2013 at 18:44 UTC as 22nd comment | 1 reply
On Aurora reflection photo in Thilo's photo gallery (1 comment in total)


Direct link | Posted on Mar 26, 2013 at 11:51 UTC as 1st comment
On Winter Photography in Iceland article (83 comments in total)

Top left and centre images are out of this world!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 14, 2012 at 20:29 UTC as 8th comment
On Clearing Storm - Mont St. Michel photo in ianbramham's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

Absolutely stunning Ian.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 21:53 UTC as 2nd comment
On First Impressions: Using the Nikon D800 article (307 comments in total)
In reply to:

Lensflair: Second on first glance the D800 appears to be a huge technical leap because it is 36MP on a full frame sensor. But as many have pointed out on the forum, pixel density is comparable with cropped sensors such as the 7D. So in reality from a pixel density point of view it is more of a huge marketing leap that will appeal to those who don’t really understand sensors and think that the bigger the number the better. Thirdly I don’t think Canon have been left behind, but rather they have chosen a different path that in reality you cant say is better or worse than Nikon, it is just different. Canon appears to value sensitivity and noise over shear pixel count on their full frame sensors. Fourth, I would suggest that the majority of people would not notice a real difference in an image from the D800 vs the 5D3.

If canon had the 36MP body you'd argue to the death that 36MP was good and the bigger the better. You are evidently hurt that canon have not really delivered what you wanted, why the heck else would you be posting on a D800 user thread if you are a canon fanboy wouldn't you stick to canon? Why are you here, come on tell us? The canon sensor has only 11.2 stops of DR compared to 14.4 for the Nikon, the portrait bit depth is poor compared to the D800, etc etc the canon sensor is a weak update with autofocus as the 5d was a manual focus camera, wasn't it ;-) What is funny is people are taking your troll bait on here, it's evident what you are and why you are here. Go outside and get some sunshine mate. Get a life more to the point!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 19, 2012 at 17:22 UTC
Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8