Lives in France Montpellier, France
Works as a Graphic and non graphic Designer
Joined on Jul 31, 2004
About me:

Wake up. Go out. Make some photos.


Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7
On Fujifilm X100T Review preview (452 comments in total)
In reply to:

IvanM: I absolutely love everything about this only concern is that the images look so soft compared to the rest in the DPR test charts....not sure if it matters much, but.....

I agree. I compared to fujifilm x-a1 raw 1600 and it's night and day. X100t looks soft, blurred. Also, the girl at night on the Image Quality page, man, the quality of that image doesn't look very good. Maybe as a print it works, but looks kinda bad on my screen.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 25, 2015 at 15:23 UTC
In reply to:

Menneisyys: greatto see fuji's x-trans cameras easily beat even the Sony 24mpixel aps-c sensor noise-wise, even after downsizing the Sony images.

On my screen the x-t1 images look like a nasty blur...i was looking at RAW files up to 3200. They really look out of focus. The sony a6000 images had a lot of color noise easily handled in pp. Compared with Nikon d750, also their d610. Full frame nikon images on a whole other level.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 23, 2014 at 08:23 UTC
In reply to:

Samuel Dilworth: Barnaby, you have surpassed yourself with these photos of the execs. They really are good.

wonder what that exec was thinking as a fuji x100s was being used for this portrait and not a canon ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 3, 2014 at 18:01 UTC
On Fujifilm X-A1 real-world and test scene samples article (105 comments in total)

Are these real world samples all jpegs produced by the camera? Also, is this how the x-a1 kit is being sold, with the 18-55. Here, it's the 16-50. Comparable image quality?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 31, 2013 at 10:38 UTC as 31st comment
In reply to:

Dolan Halbrook: It seems to have been mostly missed but this update adds camera profiles for pretty much all Olympus m43 bodies, the E-5, and XZ series. Great news for Oly shooters.

It's nice that adobe sees fit to update acr in CS6, but I've been having trouble with acr and so have some others. It's been goin' on a while now with no solution yet. See the link. Exposure slider not working correctly, and no lens profiles available either. Hope you oly shooters are having better luck.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 12, 2013 at 19:44 UTC
On Adobe expands Photoshop and Lightroom offer article (628 comments in total)
In reply to:

NJOceanView: From what I can tell, this is best for people who *don't* have the prerequisite CS/LR products already (CS3+). The link below from DPR shows that if you *do* have those prerequisites, the $9.99/month price is guaranteed for life.

nothing is guaranteed for life...not even a cc subscription...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 21, 2013 at 21:26 UTC
In reply to:

Karl Summers: I'm new to Lightroom 5. I just ordered the boxed version which probably isn't the 5.3 version. Will my copy of LR be eligible for a free update?

They also told us to buy CS6 if we wanted to upgrade to CS7.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 9, 2013 at 17:36 UTC
Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7