razorfish

razorfish

Lives in Norway Norway
Joined on Feb 28, 2007

Comments

Total: 36, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Sony a6000 Review preview (764 comments in total)

Make a smashing new camera with great performance, cripple some key features like the viewfinder and electronic level, now you've created an "upgrade path" to your essentially dinosaur "full frame" models. How do you still get a gold award? Underprice it a lot compared to competing brands, and even seasoned reviewers won't notice the crippling going on.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2014 at 17:20 UTC as 143rd comment | 5 replies

Why doesn't anyone have the guts to make a 17-120mm for a dslr or mirrorless? That would be a dream standard zoom, but everything starts at 24mm only so you still need to carry a true wideangle

Direct link | Posted on Apr 2, 2014 at 17:08 UTC as 6th comment | 2 replies

I'd like it even better if it was called Noctilux like a real Leica. Panasonic should have demanded that. What's a "Nocticron" anyway??

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 16:05 UTC as 16th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

peevee1: To put things into perspective. I bought 64" 3D plasma TV with all bells and whistles for less than that. I can buy a used car for less than that. I can buy a house in 3rd world country for less than that.

For the price of a Canon 70-200mm IS, you could buy two of those items. For the price of a (german-made) Leica Noctilux you could buy seven. Your point being......?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 15:41 UTC
In reply to:

SeeRoy: "Stereoscopic effect..." Hmm.
£1300... Double-hmm.
I'll stick with my Olympus 45/1.8, thanks.
Edited
to discount the lens down from £1500 to a bargain basement £1300. I'll still keep my Olympus 45 though.

Oh great, yabokkie is here... Weren't you banned?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 12:40 UTC
In reply to:

goshigoo: Spec-wise, it is even worse than fuji's one....except OIS

for $1600....it's better to get D610 + 85 f/1.8G
which is only ~USD $2000 in HK....

Point is, Barnet, this lens is not really overpriced. It's expensive, yes. Not everyone will be willing to pay for it. I'm not sure I am, though I probably will get it at some point. Regardless it's nice to know there is such a lens available in the system.

But overpriced it is not. Consider what you're getting: The brightest aperture available in an AF lens, for any system. OIS in an f1.2, a world first. Premuim, all-metal build. Supreme sharpness wide open (most likely), extremely rare in an f1.2. Silent AF that works just as well for photo and video. Also, you have to consider the system. m43 is (in my opinion) the most attractive system right now. People will pay more for a premium lens in a well-supported system with access to a range of nice camera bodies.

Look at the best lenses for Canon and Nikon. Pricing is just as steep, maybe even steeper. Look at Leica. Their lenses are not even AF, but many pay for them anyway.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 12:09 UTC
In reply to:

parkmcgraw: 1 of 4

Are the lens reviews published by dpReview purposefully attempting to dumb down the readers, habitually 60% correct, or are the writers at dpReview simply and habitually working beyond their subject matter comfort zone and or technical level of proficiency?

This article being another disappointing report and or supplied text that arbitrarily disrespects industry established verbiage, thus convoluting the subject matter of optics and photography, apparently encouraged and or escaping past a management accustom to low performance standards (a.k.a. more apt at providing excuses for mediocrity and ultimately bad behavior).

1] "... portraits with rich stereoscopic effect ..."

No monocular system, forming a singular imaging upon a single focal plane, such that any given point on the focal plane sees an identical image (aperture), does not produce "stereoscopic effect" but rather the "perception of depth".

Not a review... Moron

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 11:31 UTC
In reply to:

goshigoo: Spec-wise, it is even worse than fuji's one....except OIS

for $1600....it's better to get D610 + 85 f/1.8G
which is only ~USD $2000 in HK....

More whining. Just shut up and vote with your wallet.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 11:21 UTC
In reply to:

Matz03: so I can get then new fuji 56mm and an X-E1 or just the panasonic? or a 6d and the 85mm f1.8 for a tad more? Pricing here is absurd

Well get the Fuji then. No need to whine about it in here. Guess you really want the Panasonic, right?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 11:19 UTC
In reply to:

Chanthis: $1600 for a m4/rds lens? LOL, there's one born every minute.

In a few years, when mirrorless medium-sensored cameras have 95% of the system-camera market, you'll realize how ridiculous your comment is.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 11:16 UTC
In reply to:

slncezgsi: It will be very interesting to see how this lens will stack up against the Oly 45/1.8 (which is great and much cheaper and probably smaller and lighter). OK - there is 1 stop of a difference.

I personally think that it is great to have more choices.

But the price is STEEP for this one. With most of high end m43 bodies having built-in IS, having in-lens IS brings little advantage and just adds to price.

Kidding? Olympus video?? Really??? Have you seen Olympus video???

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 23:12 UTC
In reply to:

slncezgsi: It will be very interesting to see how this lens will stack up against the Oly 45/1.8 (which is great and much cheaper and probably smaller and lighter). OK - there is 1 stop of a difference.

I personally think that it is great to have more choices.

But the price is STEEP for this one. With most of high end m43 bodies having built-in IS, having in-lens IS brings little advantage and just adds to price.

Remember, Panasonic m4/3 is as much about video as it is about photo. Without OIS, this lens would be pretty useless for handheld video...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 22:50 UTC
In reply to:

SunnyFlorida: Memo to Panny - Fuji 56mm F/1.2 APS-C lens is $600 cheaper, good luck selling these

The Panasonic has OIS, the Fuji don't...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 22:48 UTC

I lucked out with the filter mount coming in at 67mm. I own a Heliopan vario-ND (cost $353 new) in just that size. An ideal filter to use with such a lens, both in photo and video.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 22:12 UTC as 46th comment
In reply to:

b534202: I would like to see Olympus tackle this FL & aperture and see what they can come up with w/o OIS.

They haven't try to sell one MFT lens for more than a $1000, unlike Pany.

Just wait for the 40-150mm f2.8

Olympus have been deadly afraid to make quality m4/3 products after that strategy failed with 4/3. Just now they're coming around with the E-M1. Just now they realize they should have made high-end m4/3 products from the get-go. Live and learn...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 22:00 UTC

Lumix is looking more and more like the most desirable photographic brand. Their products are true photo/video hybrids. The design is lovely (look at the GX7). Their lenses are rock solid pieces of art, sharp from the widest aperture. They do avant garde stuff, like putting OIS in an f1.2 lens. They even control their own sensor manufacturing. And if you don't find the right Lumix lens that you need, you can be sure Olympus has something for you (even though their QC is not quite up to Lumix standards). m43 is becoming an extremely well-supported line of products.

Soon there won't be a need to pay for Leica branding any more. In some years the Lumix name will be more prestigeous.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 21:51 UTC as 55th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

razorfish: Of course this is more expensive than the Fuji. It has OIS! That's pretty groundbreaking stuff. A world first for a lens this fast actually.

Why come in here and write post after post about a product you obviously do not care for? What's that all about? I'll never understand such a sour mindset.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 21:40 UTC
In reply to:

tkbslc: "A highly reliable metal mount is durable enough for repeated mounting of the lens."

I should hope so!! Every other lens in the history of changeable lenses has been durable enough for repeated mounting.

LOL... fantastic...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 21:27 UTC
In reply to:

Tapper123: Price is absurd.

Look at the Fuji equivalent. Hope this bombs hard in the market.

Let's see. The Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS is $2499 at Adorama. The non-IS Version is $1449...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 21:23 UTC
In reply to:

razorfish: Of course this is more expensive than the Fuji. It has OIS! That's pretty groundbreaking stuff. A world first for a lens this fast actually.

m43, and especially Panasonic products, is much more about hybrid photo/video than Fuji. If they had made this lens without OIS it would have been pretty useless for handheld video shooting. Now, just think about the creative video possibilities with such a lens.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 21:19 UTC
Total: 36, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »