blank_

Joined on Aug 22, 2006

Comments

Total: 46, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »

if there was a FF sensor, no flash and it wasn't so ugly, I might be interested.

Link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 08:56 UTC as 76th comment

every J1/2/3 owner, who knows photography basics, must feel sad looking at coolpix A top and back controls and then looking back at his camera

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2013 at 16:59 UTC as 96th comment
In reply to:

Greg Gebhardt: I had the Sony RX and I am NOT buying a fixed lens compact! PERIOD!

agreed. (after using GRD and DP1)

it will be a great camera for those, who can live with fixed 28mm, but I'd go with a system camera anytime

Link | Posted on Mar 5, 2013 at 11:06 UTC
In reply to:

evoprox: What the NEX system needs IMO are fast, high-quality lenses, not more bodies.

true, but it's nice that they made the body smaller this time. I wish they go for even more compact body in rx1/100 style.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2013 at 09:03 UTC
On article Just Posted: Canon EOS 6D In-depth Review (531 comments in total)
In reply to:

InTheMist: The compressed focusing coverage on both the 6D and D600 put me off.

Am I alone?

same for me. Other than that the camera would be perfect for my needs, but without the improvement in AF coverage, I'll keep the 5d mkI for few more years. I also wish they keep the joystick.

edit: the smaller size in nice though, if I had nothing to shoot with, I'd be torn between this and used 5d mkII

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2013 at 10:07 UTC

J3 looks good to me - slim, light and clean, but some controls wouldn't hurt.
They already have 4 similar cameras with these frustrating menu driven controls.
What prevents Nikon from using a PSAM wheel is beyond me.

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2013 at 10:54 UTC as 14th comment | 1 reply
On article Just Posted: Nikon D600 In-depth Review (498 comments in total)
In reply to:

raztec: Great job in image quality, but when are we not going to get a dumbed down camera from Nikon? Why can't they put the best AF and video features in this camera?

Those who buy the D800 want the resolution. I want a light weight DSLR for bokeh and fast and accurate focus. And I want a rangefinder style FF camera with interchangeable lenses for everything else.

Seriously, is that too much to ask?

I wouldn't say idiotic, it's just marketing. Cheaper camera off course will miss something and unfortunately AF makes perfect sense especially since Canon is not very competitive in this respect either.

it's a shame, because other than af area coverage the camera is just perfect. It's also the only real cons mention in the review.

Link | Posted on Nov 16, 2012 at 00:54 UTC
On article Just Posted: Nikon D600 In-depth Review (498 comments in total)
In reply to:

raztec: Great job in image quality, but when are we not going to get a dumbed down camera from Nikon? Why can't they put the best AF and video features in this camera?

Those who buy the D800 want the resolution. I want a light weight DSLR for bokeh and fast and accurate focus. And I want a rangefinder style FF camera with interchangeable lenses for everything else.

Seriously, is that too much to ask?

agreed. Small body and bigger af area would be great.

It may be, that the manufacturers don't see a market for such camera, since so many people are buying mirrorles.

The whole "affordable" FF camera segment is developing much slower, than I thought, when 5D mkI came out 7 years ago.

Link | Posted on Nov 15, 2012 at 12:21 UTC
On article Just Posted: Nikon D600 In-depth Review (498 comments in total)
In reply to:

blank_: I always admired nikon for not crippling the AF, but I guess it was necessary this time.

I'm sorry, if I hurt your feelings in any way. I guess that shooting with the center cross sensor only for 5 years just made me too critical here (I seriously don't mean to offend anyone)

I always liked how nikon was using the same AF modul down to d300 compared to canon approach. I understand, that lesser model is going to miss something, but that does not mean I have to like it.

I was not speaking about how the AF works, but about the placement and spread of af points. I even prefer the huge coverage of d300, so for me it's a step in wrong direction.

Link | Posted on Nov 14, 2012 at 20:14 UTC
On article Just Posted: Nikon D600 In-depth Review (498 comments in total)
In reply to:

blank_: I always admired nikon for not crippling the AF, but I guess it was necessary this time.

I guess it's hard to please everyone :)
But wouldn't you prefer d700/800 af?
I'm shooting with original 5D for a long time and to have more cross sensors with a decent spread across the viewfinder is the most important upgrade, I can imagine.

sure it's "affordable FF" but I don't think it's too much to ask for the price

Link | Posted on Nov 14, 2012 at 10:22 UTC
On article Just Posted: Nikon D600 In-depth Review (498 comments in total)

I always admired nikon for not crippling the AF, but I guess it was necessary this time.

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2012 at 23:01 UTC as 111th comment | 5 replies
On article Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM preview (149 comments in total)

it may not be the most exciting lens, but it will be a great workhorse, if it's perfect wide open.

They will sell it in the kit, so the price will hopefully get reasonable.

Link | Posted on Nov 6, 2012 at 23:45 UTC as 25th comment
In reply to:

iudex: First of all I must say I do not mind the look of V2; I do not buy cameras because they look nice, but because they take good pictures.
But...
The V2 is as big as mirrorless competition with APS-C.
The V2 is as expensive as mirrorless competition with APS-C.
I don´t get such good pictures from 1" sensor that I get from the APS-C.
So why the he.l should I buy a V2 instead of an APS-C camera?

not to mention that the lenses are very slow for the sensor size.

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 10:14 UTC

they go the sony way.. more bodies than lenses :)

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 10:12 UTC as 181st comment

wrong again in my opinion.

nikon 1 should focus on getting smaller and thinner, not bigger.
I think that 1" sensor system camera is a good concept, but it's biggest strenght is, that it can be small and cheap enough to make a lot of sense as a second compact system.

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 09:41 UTC as 186th comment
In reply to:

Dave King: CANON FF compact body DSLR (Olympus OM-2 / Pentax MX size), high rez high DR chip (Nikon D800e)... the perfect match for my new 40mm 2.8 pancake!

Why do you even have to ask?

thats exactly what I would like. Small FF body around 500g would stop me from looking for another compact system. Even 6D is just too big. And since Canon is late to mirrorless, it might actually help them a lot.

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2012 at 22:34 UTC

I'd much prefer, if NEX looked like this. Hopefully they make a body with RX1 layout and E mount.

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2012 at 11:13 UTC as 133rd comment
In reply to:

blank_: this is so good.. but I would still rather have an aps-c version with smaller lens and $1400. As with the rx100 the main problem is the price

good point. But this is, how the NEX should look like. With a 24/2 prime I would get one.

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2012 at 10:04 UTC

this is so good.. but I would still rather have an aps-c version with smaller lens and $1400. As with the rx100 the main problem is the price

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2012 at 07:44 UTC as 168th comment | 2 replies

the ergonomics may be overcrippled, but I expect the AF and sensor to be very competetive.

it looks like powershot S, while some of us would prefer G style of body (which I guess will follow)

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 09:27 UTC as 307th comment | 1 reply
Total: 46, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »