duchamp: Battery life of only 350 shots?! Sony, are you serious?
"Vast range of lenses?" Pardon me, I meant AF lenses.
I'll leave the tripod/mirror lock-up discussion aside as you don't understand what they are for.
Battery life is significantly shorter on mirrorless because the screen is always on. Take all modern smartphones - they boast great screens but one must charge them at least once a day. On DSLR you can shoot all day long through the (optical) viewfinder on a sole battery only occasionally checking the results.
The reason why I am on DSLR are the vast range of lenses, flashes and other accessories. Sometime mirrorless will also offer such a diversity but not yet.
Why do they use "5-million-pixel/1.5MB images" as a benchmark?Potential buyers have 18-million-pixel/20mb images at least!
Mirror lock-up is used usually for super macro or long exposure when on tripod. This feature isn't for handheld use anyway.
If you're human chances that you consistently make sharp pictures at 1/15s are very low. With any lens.
Very convenient. Wedding/sports photogs usually add a grip (meaning more weight) for more power, because these seconds can be crucial. Sony claims this camera is for professionals. It sports professional features. It costs as rivals DSLRs. Why then is the battery life sub par?
duchamp: Who but photogs need rugged hdds?$1000?Are they nuts? At least build in a card reader!
how do you transfer files into a hdd without a computer?Why would you need a rugged hdd if you also need a computer to connect between them? A rugged hdd without a card reader is not at all for photographers and shouldn't be mentioned here at all.
To Edwaste,DSLrs are easier to stabilize than mirorrless ones. Neveretheless, for shutter speeds longer than 1/15 you'll need a tripod anyway.But for workflow having 1000 shots per battery is more convenient than changing batteries.
He Liar. Nice. :)
Battery life of only 350 shots?! Sony, are you serious?
Who but photogs need rugged hdds?$1000?Are they nuts? At least build in a card reader!
Look positively: it's the cheapest medium format camera! :)
andix: Nobody makes camera bags that are actually useful anymore. It seems that every manufacturer is trying to convince photographers that they should adapt their shooting style to the bag, and not the other way around. And then there's this: - Poor material and quality? Check.- Useless compartments? Check.- No room for anything other than photo gear? Check.- Awkward or dangerous access to camera? Check.- No safety / security elements? Check. - Total disregard for the market demand? Check.In the meantime, small manufacturers like Clik Elite or PacSafe pass unnoticed, because the aggressive marketing is too successful shoving the Lowepro du jour down consumers' throats. (No affiliation here.)
Never heard of both but a took a glimpse on Pacsafe site.Camsafe v25 looks exactly the same as the Fastpack aside a stupid safety lock for all 3 zippers at a time. The idea behind Fastpack is getting the camera out as fast as possible. IMO if you need a safest camera bag go for Lowepro Flipside.
Drazen Stojcic Buntovnik: I'm puzzled as to what justifies the enormous cost. Their usual Roller series, which we've used for years, are made with 1600-2000 denier ballistic nylon. These are 840. Their other models also use the high-quality YKK zippers, have included rain covers, laptop sleeves, TSA locks and actually offer more features then the Echelon series. What's the catch??? The design is very average and I would be hard pressed to justify paying 800$ for a leather handle grip. Does. Not. Compute.
They forgot to mention that the new series come with a camera and lenses of your choice. :)
armandino: Mmm.... $30,000 strapped on a drone...
...lens not included.
Firmware updates for a camera never seen at certain markets. Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn. :)
duchamp: Nikon distributor in Israel, Hadar, sent today a message to all stores that all faulty cameras (with official warranty) in stock and sold will be replaced.
To Mike FL,stores were told that not all cameras have this issue. I think Nikon will issue "an article" on identifying affected products, as they did not long ago with D810 "bright spots" problem.
To HowaboutRAW,in my opinion this a great move by the local distributor. Keeping in mind they are not representatives and have buy their stock from Nikon. This quick response, as well as previous actions regarding D600 and D810 issues, gains them a lot of positive reputation in the eyes of customers and justifies the 10-15% price difference against the gray market.
Nikon distributor in Israel, Hadar, sent today a message to all stores that all faulty cameras (with official warranty) in stock and sold will be replaced.
This is 2 times better than that of Lik!
Yoda boy: Pentax ( Ricoh ) is still introducing new products that were likely in the pipeline before their takeover from Hoya. They have the ability to create a niche product by introducing a better and more directed line of lenses. WR and A* are really the only way to go if you have a K 7 or newer body as they create a complete system, especially now that the series II flashes have been created.
For K 5 and K 3 photographers, there also should be a 10 mm or 10-20 mm WR lens, preferably with a 2.8 or 3.5 fixed f to fill a void in their lens lineup.
As to an articulating LCD screen, I personally don't see the point as the more serious photographers seem to be quite happy with fixed screens as is the norm for high end Nikon and Canon. Personally, I think one pays more attention to details when looking through a viewfinder.
For macro photography articulated screen is a blessing.
princecody: Wonder what camera & lens was used?
Most likely M-Monochrome. Expensive artwork can't be done by some mass produktion cheap dslr cameras. :)
SeeRoy: Trific invention. Only one thought - will it hold urine without disintegrating?
Only one thought - why would you want to urinate into it?