mrmut

mrmut

Lives in Korea (North) Korea (North)
Joined on Jul 8, 2009

Comments

Total: 51, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

mrmut: In a world where you are expected to produce loads of high-quality high-resolution images instantly, this is a joke. Of course, a professional can make a good image even with a piece of crap, but why would he/she want to? I use iPhone for documenting my family, because it is easy and instant. Torturing myself (or my clients) with something like this seems like masochism.

Feel the need? Because I want to spend rest of my time doing something useful, for example doing sports, or playing with my kid.

So, the procedure is: 1. go and shoot great images, 2. finish images and move on. It is really that simple. Having tools that will enable dong this quickly is essential. This leica is funny in my view. A curiosity with not much real value.

This is from a professional standpoint.

The other thing is hobby, or just playing with photography for fun.

But outside from professional sphere where you need images that will feed you, important is WHAT is on images, not how good those images are. The same is audiophiles - it is nice to have a great audio system, but if you listen what you like, you can do it on a 5USD radio and you will enjoy it.

Link | Posted on May 5, 2016 at 06:48 UTC

In a world where you are expected to produce loads of high-quality high-resolution images instantly, this is a joke. Of course, a professional can make a good image even with a piece of crap, but why would he/she want to? I use iPhone for documenting my family, because it is easy and instant. Torturing myself (or my clients) with something like this seems like masochism.

Link | Posted on May 4, 2016 at 22:51 UTC as 12th comment | 5 replies

This looks interesting. A dealbreaker for me would be not having DxO prime analogue technology, but it there is something like that, than rock'n roll.

Link | Posted on May 4, 2016 at 22:36 UTC as 8th comment
In reply to:

mrmut: Something is seriously wrong with this camera. You simply can't have banding on the camera of this price point, and I don't really get it why it should be any banding there. It is not that 24MP is a big deal today.

Now, apart from this banding issue (which is a complete dealbreaker), the camera produces nice images of excellent color, altho a bit too noisy. It is weird to see that much noise at ISO160. The lens are excellent tho.

When you charge something for premium price, better be sure it is good before you ship it, or the community will kill you.

I don't get what is the deal with Leica and their camera lineup. They have SIX systems. Why?

HowaboutRAW - That is a decent display, how it is possible you can't see banding on other images? It is not there on all of them, but definitely is when conditions meet.

For example image 35, take a look at lower bottom door box. There is pronounced banding. If need be, increase shadows or exposure a bit. Etc. Banding not there on all images, but on some definitely is.

Is this sole camera defective, or entire series doesn't mean much. Especially if you need to go this lengths to justify shortcomings of an extremely expensive and nascent proprietary system.

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2015 at 12:03 UTC
In reply to:

mrmut: Something is seriously wrong with this camera. You simply can't have banding on the camera of this price point, and I don't really get it why it should be any banding there. It is not that 24MP is a big deal today.

Now, apart from this banding issue (which is a complete dealbreaker), the camera produces nice images of excellent color, altho a bit too noisy. It is weird to see that much noise at ISO160. The lens are excellent tho.

When you charge something for premium price, better be sure it is good before you ship it, or the community will kill you.

I don't get what is the deal with Leica and their camera lineup. They have SIX systems. Why?

HowaboutRAW - I too checked the RAWs, in ACR, and got the same results. What kind of monitor do you use? I use calibrated Adobe RGB screen.

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2015 at 21:49 UTC
In reply to:

mrmut: Something is seriously wrong with this camera. You simply can't have banding on the camera of this price point, and I don't really get it why it should be any banding there. It is not that 24MP is a big deal today.

Now, apart from this banding issue (which is a complete dealbreaker), the camera produces nice images of excellent color, altho a bit too noisy. It is weird to see that much noise at ISO160. The lens are excellent tho.

When you charge something for premium price, better be sure it is good before you ship it, or the community will kill you.

I don't get what is the deal with Leica and their camera lineup. They have SIX systems. Why?

HowaboutRAW - The banding can be seen on a number of images in this gallery, in uniform/darker areas. Image 13 is an obvious example, buy there is also 31, 35, 44, etc. Others commented on this. Banding is predominantly horizontal, but there is also vertical banding present.

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2015 at 15:16 UTC

Something is seriously wrong with this camera. You simply can't have banding on the camera of this price point, and I don't really get it why it should be any banding there. It is not that 24MP is a big deal today.

Now, apart from this banding issue (which is a complete dealbreaker), the camera produces nice images of excellent color, altho a bit too noisy. It is weird to see that much noise at ISO160. The lens are excellent tho.

When you charge something for premium price, better be sure it is good before you ship it, or the community will kill you.

I don't get what is the deal with Leica and their camera lineup. They have SIX systems. Why?

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2015 at 14:19 UTC as 11th comment | 15 replies
On article Adobe announces final Camera Raw update for CS6 owners (470 comments in total)

Adobe makes fine products, but this cloud stuff is nonsense for the user, especially security-wise. It is virtually impossible to have completely safe storage of anything online.

Just from memory, Facebook, Linked In, Apple, Yandex (not to mention NSA) were hacked with all of their security, and now I need to trust yet _another_ company that they will be safe. Oh, yes, I forgot Adobe too was hacked.

And not to mention software subscriptions - today becomes harder and harder to just have something to work with, without constantly updating it. Hell, I have Power Mac PowerPC machines over ten years old, running Motorola-Mac software 30 years old without a problem.

It is irritating to see that wouldn't be possible with today's stuff.

Link | Posted on Aug 1, 2015 at 10:16 UTC as 5th comment | 4 replies

Stunning lens. I have had Contact distagon T* 25mm F2.8, and that was a great lens too, however this one is brilliant. Flare handling, OOF, SHARPNESS, etc. - WOW.

Link | Posted on Mar 6, 2015 at 14:52 UTC as 18th comment

Winning photo is stunning! :-)

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2015 at 21:28 UTC as 10th comment
On article Canon 7D mirror box filmed at 10,000fps (175 comments in total)

Brilliant video! Thanks! :-)

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2015 at 16:08 UTC as 9th comment

The photograph is nice; the price is but a detail.

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2014 at 07:31 UTC as 40th comment

This looks phenomenal.

Link | Posted on Dec 1, 2014 at 22:49 UTC as 21st comment
On photo Morning Wake-up Call in the My Best Photo of the Week challenge (14 comments in total)

Phenomenal.

What is the pixel-level quality? This image is easily of fine-art quality.

Link | Posted on Nov 26, 2014 at 20:47 UTC as 4th comment
In reply to:

Sdaniella: user programmable pixel level multi-iso (multi-gain) full res color zone-system full frame Ultra-HDR (DR 22+ EV) stills (video) real time capture FF 40mp+ (adjustable + previewable LIVE with Canon Final Image Simulation) with IQ with clean finest detail and 'no noise' (NR that doesn't distort details) in extreme lowest light (below 0.01 lux) dual-pixel PDAF (full-frame) ... and throw in global shutter, too ... (sensor that runs much cooler than any todate; DiG!C #?) ... and up to 240fps+ (intended for HDR flexibility) ... H.265 for video 4k/8k and 2k/1080p ... and ... tri-mode evf-ovf hybrid VF with a top hinged modular VASS (vari-angle swivel screen) ... touch screen wifi remote ...

(\ /)
( o.o) ---( hehehehe ... )
o(")(")

as for medium format ... they'd have to create a whole bunch of EOS E-MF lenses ... unlikely (not impossible)

Made my day :-)

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2014 at 17:28 UTC
In reply to:

mrmut: This is rude. I would sue, and request reparations.

The same situation is if a remote IR trigger is set, which would result in a photo when an animal snap it. If not for a photographer, the image would not exist.

I came to think that the monkey had a hidden agenda.

Link | Posted on Aug 7, 2014 at 15:59 UTC
In reply to:

Easycass: A simplified view...

Definition: To 'take' a photo means 'initiate the exposure', regardless of where the camera is mounted, what is in the frame, who or what is holding the camera, how much lugging it took to get there, how much expense, how much post-processing was done, who posted it, or where it was posted. Agreed?

Copyright: If a person initiates an exposure, whether a single shot, a self-timed, remote-released or trigger-released shot, creating a single exposure, sequence of exposures or video sequence, then, unless the person waives their rights in some written agreement, they own the copyright. Agreed?

Scenario 1: If a person is not holding the camera, but initiates the exposure(s) then copyright is theirs.

Scenario 2: If a person is not holding the camera, and does not initiate the exposure(s) then copyright is not theirs. If the exposure was initiated by another human, copyright belongs to that other person. If not initiated by a human, there is no copyright.

It is simple, really - the photographer did initiate the exposure, by giving the camera to monkey.

If he had handed a bomb to monkey, and monkey activated it, would anyone blame the monkey?

Link | Posted on Aug 7, 2014 at 06:48 UTC

This is rude. I would sue, and request reparations.

The same situation is if a remote IR trigger is set, which would result in a photo when an animal snap it. If not for a photographer, the image would not exist.

Link | Posted on Aug 7, 2014 at 05:33 UTC as 410th comment | 4 replies
On article Sony Alpha 7S added to test scene comparison tool (272 comments in total)
In reply to:

NeilJones: 12mp is only really good for posting on Facebook. Looks like most photogs out there will be fine! Doh.

Good one. :-)

Link | Posted on Jun 20, 2014 at 11:58 UTC
In reply to:

mrmut: Viewing war photos during exhibitions often makes me wander how in the world a photographer got out of that alive AND take a picture.

I am not sure if we should mourn war photographers, given that they accepted their faith in advance; mourning them seems a bit disrespectful. It makes much more sense just to appreciate photographer's work.

Apart from that, Afghanistan was not a very smart move for a woman photographer. Her presence there was insulting to locals on many levels (regardless of how that can be perceived by westerners - it is Afghans' country).

Just as an update - took a look at the documentary, but it didn't impress me. OTOH I personally met an talked extensively with some of the actual war photographers, all in all, it seemed to me that they all carry deep wounds that make them do what they do.

Link | Posted on Jun 6, 2014 at 21:02 UTC
Total: 51, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »