Where is the E-M5 update?!? :P
Biowizard: Perfect Timing! Bought my E-M1 from Park Cameras in Burgess Hill just yesterday; today, I charged the battery and started playing, wondering about the 1.0 firmware in the system - and then here comes this! Serendipity, you are my love!
Totally agree. It's amazing how Fujifilm got this reputation even though they aren't the first nor the best example.
Don't be ridiculous, there have been more exceptions like that. Just look at the 7D or A900.
Nice but I rather use just DxO standalone, LR isn't very good anyway.
Devilsh: I cringe watching these photographers work without a viewfinder. It seems such a pain to work with the screen and hold the camera awkwardly out in front of you. Doesn't seem natural at all. No real information on how this thing handles in low light which is an area it might (should) excel? And of course, throw out your workflow tools like photoshop and lightroom when using its raw files. Give DP Review one and let them figure it out for us....
You should go to the gym.
Karroly: To use the new potential of this technology seamlessly, we need to create a new interactive display "device" that automatically puts into focus the area of the picture ours eyes are looking at. Maybe a software using the front camera or webcam of laptops, smartphones, tablets, etc... to detect the eye positions and angles to focus the picture accordingly ?
I don't think that's their intention.
Holger Bargen: 1) I do not need a camera like this.2) I would like to have it!!!
Every camera will be like this in a few decades. Everything a lens adds to the image can be mimicked in software as long as the sensor captures the proper data to enable it and you have the compute power to do so.
munro harrap: I can watch my lenses going in and out of focus and film it now. I am lost here. In what way is a Lytro different?
Erm, it enables you the option to set the focus after you shot it
spatz: Lytro is fantastic with a viewer that supports eye tracking.
That changes everything. Without it, no more than a gimmick.
That's not the point. The point is to be able to set the focus after you shot it.
RichRMA: Kind of pointless, to an extent. Most people who watch on TVs sit too far back to even SEE what 4K can show, so where is the advantage? It just sucks up more memory and processing power. Increase frame rate on 2k to 120fps, it would be much better.
Not everybody has a tiny 42" screen. Even 65" screens are cheap these days and you can see the difference easily.
ageha: No touch screen...
The new screen is also smaller. :(
Ashuaria Lee: NX3000 seems to be successor of NX2000.However, the H/W seems a little cheap(no GPS, small LCD, no Touch and blahblahblah..)But, has a light weighted small body and probably nice PowerZoom lens and Low price.Let's see the JPEG quality.
The NX3000 seems to be more a successor of the NX1100. The NX2000 is still a better camera.
HendeHoq: Looks very good and with a classic controls. Hope Samsung weird experiments on NX line are gone.
Classic controls? Sure...
Gesture: Beautiful camera. Excellent sensor. Great focus accuracy. World-class ergonomics. AND a great kit focal length.
Any links to the photos you shot with it?
Michael Ma: I would like to see Samsung take on the A7S with and incorporate a Samsung SSD into it. Only fear is at the last minute, they'll change their mind the last second to put a 12 megapixel sensor for a 40 megapixel one and not even register on people's radar.
Before they slap a SSD into it they need to develop a full-frame sensor and at least one full-frame lens.
No touch screen...
XVOYAGERX: Very nice, very sharp picture of a beautiful lady, most of these pictures taken with this lens look in my opinion to be superior from what i have seen from Canon, Nikon, Sony etc so far, superb, well done again Panasonic!!!!
You're kidding, right?
Alex Bayraktarov: It looks like the lens is excellent but there is also the Olympus 45 mm 2.8,which has been said to deliver outstanding images(let alone for a lense of its price).The Panasonic costs nearly 5 times as much.I just love taking photos and by no means can i call myself a photographer.But still i can not help but ask myself the question,is it really worth it paying 5 times more for 2 f stops.The olympus 45 mm 2.8 has gotten quite impressive reviews all over the place.It is a long way from $350(or whatever it sells for) to $1600.
The 45mm f/2.8 is a Panasonic, the 45mm f/1.8 is an Olympus.
kecajkerugo: despite it is the tructh or not....it does not matter anything to the real pictures quality! Show your best pictures to your friends and familiy on the best available device (like 50 or something inch 4K LCD) and observe wheher anybody will be discussing the camera lens correction needs, electronic or not. Anybody will be asking you to zoom in to say 400% to see your pixels?No, noby wull even notice that! All it will be noticed is the substance of your photos shown! So for this community such endless discussion may bring some "value" (value of wasting your time) but has nothing to do with real art or even joy associated with making photos.
dpreview.com isn't about "the art of making photos", it's about gear reviews. If you're not interested in technical details don't waste time here.