ageha

ageha

Lives in Singapore Singapore
Joined on Jul 18, 2004

Comments

Total: 443, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On article Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM review (592 comments in total)
In reply to:

Robert Newman: 50mm is a focal length that most professional photographers seldom use. Regardless of its optical merits, it is just not something I would ever consider buying especially at the price point at which it is being introduced.

Exactly, 50mm is neither here nor there. Anyway, it's a great lens but I would prefer the lighter 58mm F1.4 Nikon.

Link | Posted on May 29, 2014 at 08:09 UTC
On article Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM review (592 comments in total)
In reply to:

eyeswideshut: I really don't know what to admire more. Someone who - one hundred years ago - achieved roughly similar performance with four lenses in three groups at F/2.8 or a corporation which - a century later - achieves marginally better performance corner to corner with the aid of cad/cam and thirteen lenses in four groups at a whopping 800g and a thousand dollars.

Which lens are you talking about?

Link | Posted on May 29, 2014 at 08:07 UTC
On article Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM review (592 comments in total)
In reply to:

beavertown: It is almost half price of the Nikon 58mm f1.4 and a lot cheaper than the Carl Zeiss 50mm.

It's a pro, not a con for its price.

This lens is not in the same class of the Nikon 50mm f1.4, it is a much more superior lens.

Really? Who would have thought...

Link | Posted on May 29, 2014 at 08:05 UTC
On article Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM review (592 comments in total)
In reply to:

Just another Canon shooter: Your bokeh test is useless - background well separated from the foreground or closeups. The problems usually are in the transition area. Some lenses, like the S35 are particularly bad there.

You could have included this shot: http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/reviewsamples/photos/2897503/f1-4_01img_5736?inalbum=sigma-50mm-f1-4-dg-hsm-art-canon-preview-samples
in the bokeh section, and compared it to the Nikon and the Canon.

I have the feeling that you know more than you say but you do not want to be more critical. You mention AF problems with cheap bodies and off center AF points and then dismiss it - who really used that lens on cheap bodies? How about off center focusing with the 5D3 and the D800?

Yeah, the hokey could be better. Well, at least the lens is sharp even wide open.

Link | Posted on May 29, 2014 at 08:03 UTC
On article Street photography tips with Zack Arias (152 comments in total)
In reply to:

Len_Gee: What lens is Zack using in the opening shots? Looks like some kind of pancake lens?
Also, his camera bag?
Not a Fuji X user yet, but looking to move up,from MFT kit.

I wouldn't, Fujifilm's lenses aren't that great.

Link | Posted on May 29, 2014 at 08:02 UTC
On photo F1.4_01IMG_5736 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (8 comments in total)
In reply to:

W4YNE 1: Very nice second image of the boy playing on the beach. Looks like another winner in this lens from Sigma, and probably no doubt considerably cheaper than the big boys equivalent lenses.

Cheaper? :P

Link | Posted on May 29, 2014 at 08:01 UTC
On a photo in the Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM Art (Canon) preview samples sample gallery (8 comments in total)
In reply to:

W4YNE 1: Very nice second image of the boy playing on the beach. Looks like another winner in this lens from Sigma, and probably no doubt considerably cheaper than the big boys equivalent lenses.

Cheaper? :P

Link | Posted on May 29, 2014 at 08:01 UTC
On a photo in the Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM Art (Canon) preview samples sample gallery (8 comments in total)

Still one of the very few good photos in this gallery.

Link | Posted on May 29, 2014 at 08:01 UTC as 1st comment
On photo F1.4_01IMG_5736 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (8 comments in total)

Still one of the very few good photos in this gallery.

Link | Posted on May 29, 2014 at 08:01 UTC as 1st comment
On article Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM review (592 comments in total)
In reply to:

ppando: Too bad Sigma doesn't offer it in the Sony FE mount!

And they never will. This lens has a motor for PDAF,

Link | Posted on May 28, 2014 at 15:48 UTC
On article Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG HSM review (592 comments in total)
In reply to:

flyto9: It might be a dump question to ask. Should I get 50mm or 32mm? I tried 50mm (Fullframe) and 40mm (20mm m43). Whenever I see a picture and want to capture it. 50mm seems to be a bit limited that I need to step back to capture the picture. It might be that I was used to my 20mm m43? I personally also whan to get the 85mm for good portrait. So would the 32mm be more appropriate in this case?

The 50mm art seems to have a better review than the 32mm art. Is it that much better? optically? IP? Bokeh?

thanks

There is no 32mm Art obviously.

Link | Posted on May 28, 2014 at 15:46 UTC
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)
In reply to:

ageha: The lenses still look like designed by Panasonic...

I own Pana Leica lenses for m43 and the newer ones are good. I'm not too happy about the 45/2.8 but it's one of the first ones. Anyway, the design looks misplaced on the T. I'm just complaining about the cheap plastic look at this price point.

Link | Posted on May 28, 2014 at 09:32 UTC
On article Leica M Monochrom now available in grayscale (sort of) (136 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dirk Nuary: $7700 for just BW camera? You are too bad panda.... Just go for D4s that win in every aspects.

The DP Merrills actually have a pretty good B&W output, I like it.

Link | Posted on May 28, 2014 at 09:29 UTC
On article Leica M Monochrom now available in grayscale (sort of) (136 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dirk Nuary: $7700 for just BW camera? You are too bad panda.... Just go for D4s that win in every aspects.

I rather take the M Monochrom with me.

Link | Posted on May 27, 2014 at 02:33 UTC

Interesting but pricy.

Link | Posted on May 25, 2014 at 16:26 UTC as 5th comment
On article DxO Optics Pro 9.5 now integrates with Adobe Lightroom (63 comments in total)
In reply to:

ageha: Nice but I rather use just DxO standalone, LR isn't very good anyway.

LG is too soft. I only use it for importing photos. DxO 9 and Silkypix Pro 6 are a lot sharper than LR and still show less noise. LR is pretty much the worst converter, at least for Nikon NEF and Panasonic's RW2 files.

Link | Posted on May 25, 2014 at 16:14 UTC
On article Lytro Illum in the hands of five leading photographers (164 comments in total)

At that price they won't have a chance unfortunately and they really need to bring better software to the market.

Link | Posted on May 25, 2014 at 16:07 UTC as 4th comment
On article Street photography tips with Zack Arias (152 comments in total)
In reply to:

Len_Gee: What lens is Zack using in the opening shots? Looks like some kind of pancake lens?
Also, his camera bag?
Not a Fuji X user yet, but looking to move up,from MFT kit.

XF 27mm F2.8 I guess and some Think Tank Retrospective (Pinestone).

Link | Posted on May 25, 2014 at 16:06 UTC
In reply to:

StevenE: The shots are barely larger than thumbnails

Yeah and at that size photos look a lot better. Some of them might fall apart at a decent resolution.

Link | Posted on May 25, 2014 at 16:01 UTC
On article Street photography tips with Zack Arias (152 comments in total)

Interesting...

Link | Posted on May 25, 2014 at 16:00 UTC as 28th comment
Total: 443, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »