ageha

ageha

Lives in Singapore Singapore, Singapore
Joined on Jul 18, 2004

Comments

Total: 313, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Seriously? Those photos?!?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 13, 2014 at 02:24 UTC as 29th comment
On Nikon D610 Review preview (286 comments in total)

That was relatively quick for DPR!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 12, 2014 at 19:13 UTC as 68th comment
On Nikon D610 Review preview (286 comments in total)
In reply to:

Retzius: I bet the D620 comes out next year with wi-fi, gps, expeed4, and a dirty sensor.

Then they can release the D630 6 months later.

Won't happen. ;)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 12, 2014 at 19:08 UTC
In reply to:

nasserdjawas: is this rain/water resistant?

no

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2014 at 04:56 UTC
In reply to:

dynaxx: I am confused ; I thought CMOS used a rolling shutter unlike the CCD sensor that exposes the entire 44mm X 33m frame simultaneously.

How can the H system lenses with their central ( global ? ) shutters work with both CCD and CMOS ?

CCD colours have always been better ( like the Fuji X-Pro 1, the last DSLR with CCD ) so this seems to be the trade-off versus practicality.

Oh well, the Fuji X-Pro 1 doesn't even have a CCD!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2014 at 06:43 UTC
In reply to:

RichRMA: So does this mean all those D600's languishing on dealer shelves will be sent back, fixed and sent back to the dealers for sale, or will it be the responsibility of the customer? Imagine the logistics of this for Nikon.

True but that's just on the Amazon marketplace. The big reputable dealers don't have any left.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 28, 2014 at 03:55 UTC
In reply to:

AlexBakerPhotoz: Well, good. I did have mine fixed once already a year ago and at that time they replaced the shutter and the CCD and it's clearly been much better. I also wonder if I sent it in again if I'd get the D610 shutter or another D600 one. I'm thinking D610. What would be the point of using the old ones if they even have any left in inventory.

Wow, your D600 had a CCD! lol

Direct link | Posted on Feb 28, 2014 at 03:51 UTC
In reply to:

Xentinus: What about D7000 owners?!

What about D610 owners?!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 28, 2014 at 03:48 UTC

For most people who had this issue a new shutter didn't fix the oil problem in the past and Nikon is replacing the D600's shutter since the early days.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2014 at 06:41 UTC as 51st comment
In reply to:

RichRMA: So does this mean all those D600's languishing on dealer shelves will be sent back, fixed and sent back to the dealers for sale, or will it be the responsibility of the customer? Imagine the logistics of this for Nikon.

There are no new D600 left anyway for some time already.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2014 at 06:38 UTC
In reply to:

Andersonbill: I sent my first D600 in for the repair last year. They repaired it, but dropped it and had to replace the front ring. They sent back, it worked for about a week and then autofocus failed. They replaced that camera. I'm about to send it in and take them up on the offer. The shutter has been the problem from the beginning, now I'll get a new shutter and it's unlikely to be the same as the old one.

I'm just guessing here, but I think I will get the D610 shutter. Now if they would also give me the firmware that goes in the D610, I'm pretty sure I would have a D610!! Sweet.

No

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2014 at 06:31 UTC
In reply to:

JJ1983: Erm... I had this done free of charge months ago. The D600 now works great and dust is not an issue anymore.

Sure ;)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2014 at 06:30 UTC
In reply to:

ageha: It's sad Nikon won't have an own raw converter anymore. NX-D is just a rebranded and free edition of Silkypix.

You're correct but all the other in-camera settings I expect from a 1st party raw converter are missing.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2014 at 05:13 UTC

It's sad Nikon won't have an own raw converter anymore. NX-D is just a rebranded and free edition of Silkypix.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 26, 2014 at 05:49 UTC as 32nd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Heaven is for real: For those haters or don't anything about Sony/Zeiss Partnership...

"Sony is the brand of choice for people looking for great design and high quality. In 1996, Sony came out with its first camcorder with a Carl Zeiss lens. Since then, Carl Zeiss and Sony’s cooperation has expanded to include compact digital cameras and camcorders, high-quality bridge cameras and interchangeable lenses for the Sony Alpha DSLR camera. Sony and Carl Zeiss develop Lenses for Sonys digital cameras together. Then the manufacturing takes place in Sony facilities according to Carl Zeiss specifications. It’s a partnership that combines premium-quality electronics and sensor technology with the best-possible optics for film and video cameras."

So please stop spreading wrong information!

You have to love those Sony, Nokia and Logitech propaganda texts on Zeiss' page. I wonder how much those 3 companies have to pay for Zeiss' advertising service. :) But maybe that's all their partnerships are about.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2014 at 01:12 UTC
On Sony a6000 First Impressions Review preview (606 comments in total)
In reply to:

plasnu: Image Samples. So much better than any NEX.

http://www.photographyblog.com/previews/sony_a6000_photos/

lol

Direct link | Posted on Feb 18, 2014 at 22:31 UTC
On Sony a6000 First Impressions Review preview (606 comments in total)
In reply to:

DT200: "From what we were able to see, the camera focuses slightly faster than the previous NEX 6 but it isn’t anything with blazing speed. "
http://www.thephoblographer.com/2014/02/11/first-impressions-sony-a6000/
Need more hands on reviews.

"As mentioned ,we had a brief opportunity to play with a preproduction sample, and it’s no joke: The autofocusing is extremely fast and responsive."

You can read comments like that in almost every preview these days.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 18, 2014 at 22:29 UTC
On Sony a6000 First Impressions Review preview (606 comments in total)
In reply to:

pew pew: Imagine a camera like the a6000, with A mount a bit bigger because the mount distance, but still small with all those minolta lenses available for really cheap, that would be perfect :d

It will have the same size as an A6000 with Sony's adapter slapped on. No point in selling the same camera with a non-removable adapter glued on.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 18, 2014 at 22:26 UTC
On Sony a6000 First Impressions Review preview (606 comments in total)
In reply to:

ChefPisi: is this camera made in China like the NEX 6? I sure hope not!

It's made well and as everybody knows it isn't made in China, it's made in Thailand.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 18, 2014 at 22:21 UTC
On Sony Alpha 7R Review preview (761 comments in total)
In reply to:

Babka08: Why all the talk of Nikon and Canon comparisons? This Sony seems more like a rangefinder competitor, no? Probably shake in your boots, Leica. But the whole EVF thing still isn't fully baked so not quite yet...

The Sony isn't a rangefinder.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 18, 2014 at 21:58 UTC
Total: 313, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »