Northgrove

This makes even less sense than a studio shoot with an RX100. But sure, it's cool that smartphones are competing with compact digital camera quality...

They don't fit that lens onto this one because it would get enormous. The FZ200 has a much smaller and crappier sensor in order to manage such a long zoom with such an aperture.

I agree. That's the problem with these cameras. Their small sensors make them demand progress with each new generation for them to keep competing or fall behind so much that even the better zoom...

I agree. That's the problem with these cameras. Their small sensors demand progress with each new generation for them to keep competing or fall behind so much that even the better zoom range isn't...

I had no idea it could do this despite following several news sources covering Apple news daily. Good job there. :)

It's a bold review by DPReview, but also aspects I've heard echoes numerous times with the RX100/II and something that's made me wary of purchasing it. The specs tell "Buy me now!", the photos as...

It's a bold review by DPReview, but also aspects I've heard echoed numerous times with the RX100/II and something that's made me wary of purchasing it. The specs tell "Buy me now!", the photos as...

It's a bold review by DPReview, but also aspects I've heard echoed numerous times with the RX100/II and something that's made me wary of purchasing it. The specs tell "Buy me now!", the photos as...

No, the point of 40 MP is absolutely not to crop the image. That would mess with the focal length and cheat the user.

No, the point of 40 MP is absolutely not to crop the image. That would mess with the focal length and cheat the user. No camera assumes that the end-user should take care of cropping horrible lens...

No, the point of 40 MP is absolutely not to crop the image. That would mess with the focal length and cheat the user, causing a host of problems such as seeing something on the LCD that doesn't...

I think the same... But pay attention to the ISO. The 5s is shooting at almost twice the sensitivity.

I think the same... But pay attention to the ISO. The 5s is shooting at almost twice the sensitivity. I'm not sure why that is so. Did Apple silently raise the base ISO?

"The XA-1 with the Fujifilm XC 50-230mm zoom lens is all you need!"

Agreed, I strongly recommend professionals to look at the RAW import. There's quite a difference especially with this new X-Trans technology. Here's a DPReview user who has compared Lightroom 4.4...

I think it's "Mobile" (or maybe "Mini"?) because there is a focus on being compact at the cost of a viewfinder.

Heh... Those guys... If you're happy with the X100 quality (and it's seriously really high) and don't disturbed by the AF speed after all its numerous updates to it, I don't think it's a "no...

Exactly. Microsoft and Windows are too closely associated with frustrations from noisy old Windows NT mainframes, desktops, and so on. It represents clunkiness and annoyances, not visions. It's...

Exactly. Microsoft and Windows are too closely associated with frustrations from noisy old Windows NT mainframes, desktops, and so on. It represents clunkiness and annoyances, not visions. It's...

Exactly. This is how I use to think. And not from a "ooh it's Leica optics, I can have that!" perspective, but truly because Leica do demand a certain quality in their gear to not lessen the value...