danieljcox: Without the artist creating this image, there is no image. Why should he not get paid for his vision and creativity? Would anybody have bought this stamp had it just been a blank, white stamp without any sort of art? No! They bought it because it had something of interest that the artist created. The artist should be paid. Without the art the artist created, there is no stamp to sell. People who create good ideas or good art deserve to be paid.
Daniel J. Coxwww.naturalexposures.com
@Zdman : "someone can make millions off anothers hard work" - always amazed me how this purely Communist argumentation somehow feels at home among US public. You don't argue that factory workers are entitled to factory owner profits because of their "hard work", do you? Because according to Communist doctrine, this is exactly what happens here too: "someone is making millions off others hard work". The point is, this artist placed his sculpture in the public place. And in a free society, one should be able to take pictures (and make money from those pictures) of anything located in a public place. How hard it was to create is simply irrelevant.
@Zdman: "Why? Because each of these things takes a considerably amount of effort to create..." - according to this definition, anything that takes considerable amount of effort to create must be reworded. And that's just dumb.
I have seen far more fake positive reviews.
p60 video looks so much better than p24 or p30.