Sorry, I mean there is nothing in this camera in which I am remotely interested. Your mileage may differ.
Shame they can't use all that profit to make something interesting.
Because Canon seem to be relying entirely on existing customer loyalty to sell new cameras. This is not a good strategy IMO.
57even: Just comparing the photo of the Xe2 and the D5300 - not to mention the new Sony's - leaves me wondering why the hell everyone else finds camera styling so hard. KISS seems to work for Fuji, just as it worked for Leica for 60 years.
The new PEN and GX7 are finally in the ballpark after a run of ugly sisters. But most DSLRs simply look misshapen and ugly by comparison. Curves are out, edges are back in, get with the program.
Seemingly Pentax are the only people who know how to make a DSLR look smart.
Interesting comments some missing the point. There will always be people that don't care, and some people who have no aesthetic sense anyway, but in general, style sells. Apple proved it, not that it needed proving. It's even worth a premium if done well. Again, Apple proved it.
All cameras with a decent sized sensor take excellent pictures so style is a differentiator. As long as it's functional it can be retro (PEN EP5, Fuji) or modern minimalist (RX100). All stylish cameras.
Every up-market Canon SLR looks pretty much like the T90. A design approaching it's 27th birthday already. Not retro? Only because they never deviated.
Nikon and Canon survive on badge and product recognition. Other makers don't have that luxury. They are trying to attract mainstream buyers away from the big 2. They can only match them on IQ, so that means putting a bit of effort in on the style front.
Just good business.
Just comparing the photo of the Xe2 and the D5300 - not to mention the new Sony's - leaves me wondering why the hell everyone else finds camera styling so hard. KISS seems to work for Fuji, just as it worked for Leica for 60 years.
mcshan: I'd rather keep my X-E1 and get the 23mm if it ever comes out.
I agree. I think the IQ will be all but the same, so no point in upgrading for me. However the Xpro2 is more likely to raise the bar somewhat.
austin55: Fuji is a innovative company that also has the humility and customer appreciation to listen. Something Canon and Nikon quit doing long ago. I have my last Nikon DSLR shoot next Saturday, and then it goes on the block. This will be my next purchase without hesitation. It is what people like Zack Arias, David Hobby, and Trey Ratcliffe have already recognized. Bigger, heavier and more expensive, is not better (for many applications) any longer. Nikon and Canon are becoming dinosaurs and unless they change, are headed down the path toward extinction, (at least in market share.) Sony, Fuji, Panny and Oly are much more innovative these days.
@marike6All of which is quite irrelevant to the normal consumer, unless they want to bask in the reflected glory of the top end bodies. Most mid range and low end SLRs are far less functional and perform at a far lower level than the top end.
Comparing an X-e2 with a D4 is kind of pointless.
whtchocla7e: I don't know man -- after the Sony revolution, I have a hard time looking at anything with a "small" sensor now..
Larger sensor and slower lenses. Apart from the extra resolution (how big do you print anyway?) there is no real advantage and the Sonys are far more expensive and heavier.
Toccata47: The only point that matters is autofocus speed...I may have missed it, but I didn't see any commentary on this.
I care a lot more about accuracy than speed, and in this respect they are just about perfect. I can handle the difference between 0.5s and 0.2s. If I want to take street snaps in a hurry I can pre-focus. Extra speed is nice, but only if the accuracy remains as good as it is.
Having owned several SLR bodies which required exhaustive (and often frustrating) focus calibration to work at at least one aperture and focus distance in one type of light, it's a joy to have a camera that requires no calibration at all.
Tandua: very Pro Sony specs: Weather sealed
fuji x-pro1> nofuji x-e1 >nofuji x100s> no
fuji x-e2 ?...imho...no!
in a raining days...you are going to stop it
They make rain covers for cameras you know.
I think I need a GAS mask.
Only on DPReview forums do people complain both when there IS a problem AND when it's fixed. And about people who had it AND people who did not. Gotta love it. ;-)
EGARA61: I have owned different Nikon cameras for years: F801s, F80, F100, D70, D200, D600 and several compact. The D600 is a camera haughtiness but with an obvious manufacturing flaw: Abnormal dirt sensor. Nikon's way of responding to this problem is a shame. I'll never buy again a camera of this brand!
It's also a shame that cleaning it yourself voids the warranty.
KW Phua: Nikon should offer free replacement for D600 users with D610, to bring back their reputation.
Same issues with Canon. Rule of thumb is to wait six months with each new announcement before buying, and let the early adopters find all the issues. D600 was a mistake on my part. I broke my own rule.
Average User: I think it is unlikely that the new shutter mechanism has anything to do with the oil issue. The oil isn't used in the camera; it isn't manufactured by the camera, so it has to have dripped into a bunch of the cameras in the production process from an assembly machine. The fixes are: find and fix the drip: clean the cameras that can be cleaned, and replace the ones that can't be cleaned. Has nothing to do with the underlying quality of the camera, or with improving the shutter mechanism, or this upgrade.
Except that it wasn't oil.
So to get this camera to focus properly you have to hold it in front of you like a compact and focus using the rear screen? I am the only one who thinks this doesn't really move the game forward in any meaningful way?
Since when did the word "stylist" become confused with the word "designer"?
Presumably when people started paying more for the label than they did for the product.
At least it's going to a good cause.
marike6: The D600 was going to be replaced anyway (all cameras get upgraded) so now is as good a time as any for Nikon to release the D610. For the unsatisfied D600 owners, isn't it better to sell their D600 now while shutter actuations are low rather than 1 year from now?
Almost every D600 now on the big auction site has bidders so it's not like people aren't interested in purchasing used D600s.
I'd be happy with either the D600 or a D610. Lighter than my D800 and the same beautiful files. So if any unhappy D600 owners want to donate their cameras to my charity, you can keep me in mind. :-)
I dont think oil or grease was the issue. The debris was irregular shaped and varied a lot in size. Looked more like tiny flecks of some material, and many people speculated that it was the coating on the shutter blades, though I guess we will never know. All I know is that after 6 months it was still as bad as it was on day 1.
57even: Would be interested to be a fly on the wall at the product planning office in Japan. Lots of red faced apologies no doubt, but I suspect the issue was with one of their component suppliers, since it all seems to narrow down to the shutter itself.
But if anyone is thinking of actually getting a D610 it should be a very nice camera with very few issues and at current prices it's a bargain. I really liked mine, even though I did exchange it for a D800. The latter is objectively better, but I doubt you'd notice 90% of the time.
The 6D is now over 50% less than at launch in the UK, so I would guess you are right.
Would be interested to be a fly on the wall at the product planning office in Japan. Lots of red faced apologies no doubt, but I suspect the issue was with one of their component suppliers, since it all seems to narrow down to the shutter itself.