GarysInSoCal

GarysInSoCal

Lives in United States Upland, CA, United States
Works as a Pro Photographer / Screenwriter
Joined on Aug 19, 2010

Comments

Total: 24, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Nikon announces full-frame D810 with no OLPF article (97 comments in total)
In reply to:

tabloid: Come on Nikon for heavens sale make a mirror-less SLR.

If you don't know how to do it ask Sony.

Dude... for heavens sake... buy the crappy sensor Sony with over-priced lenses in short supply and STFU... :P

Direct link | Posted on Jul 7, 2014 at 06:51 UTC
In reply to:

Joed700: I've been a Nikon fan for over two decades, and I must say I'm disappointed at Nikon. I've seen their products going down the drain in terms of build quality and performance as each newer generation of cameras and lenses that came out. I doubt that Nikon would admit there's a problem with the D600 if it wasn't for the fact that China had asked them to stop selling the defective D600s. Here some suggestions for those of you who haven't heavily invested in Nikon lenses/bodies: buy the art series Sigma lenses (50mm f1.4 or 35mm f1.4) or go with Fuji X-series cameras/lenses if dof is not as critical for your photos. I still have my D800, but I use my Fuji XT-1/x100s 99% of the time...

For me amigo... the quality of Nikon products has never been better. My more recent work is testiment to that. And with all those edits you make, as least you could have spelled THIRTY correctly... LOL!

That more recent work is HERE! http://www.modelmayhem.com/2623

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2014 at 13:07 UTC
In reply to:

Joed700: I've been a Nikon fan for over two decades, and I must say I'm disappointed at Nikon. I've seen their products going down the drain in terms of build quality and performance as each newer generation of cameras and lenses that came out. I doubt that Nikon would admit there's a problem with the D600 if it wasn't for the fact that China had asked them to stop selling the defective D600s. Here some suggestions for those of you who haven't heavily invested in Nikon lenses/bodies: buy the art series Sigma lenses (50mm f1.4 or 35mm f1.4) or go with Fuji X-series cameras/lenses if dof is not as critical for your photos. I still have my D800, but I use my Fuji XT-1/x100s 99% of the time...

Fur sure... only THIRTY YEARS!... and while you're at it... how about showing us all the magazine covers, awards and publications you've been featured in... Ansel Adams... LOL!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2014 at 09:32 UTC
In reply to:

Joed700: I've been a Nikon fan for over two decades, and I must say I'm disappointed at Nikon. I've seen their products going down the drain in terms of build quality and performance as each newer generation of cameras and lenses that came out. I doubt that Nikon would admit there's a problem with the D600 if it wasn't for the fact that China had asked them to stop selling the defective D600s. Here some suggestions for those of you who haven't heavily invested in Nikon lenses/bodies: buy the art series Sigma lenses (50mm f1.4 or 35mm f1.4) or go with Fuji X-series cameras/lenses if dof is not as critical for your photos. I still have my D800, but I use my Fuji XT-1/x100s 99% of the time...

Yeah... and while you're buying all those after-market lenses... go ahead and send ME all your superior Nikon N series optics... I'll show you how to take magazine cover and award winning images with them and my zero defects (over a year old with NO problems) D600... LOL!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 9, 2014 at 08:27 UTC
In reply to:

sandy b: I have had 6 cameras from Nikon in the last twelve years. This is the first one with any issue, and they fixed it for free and it works perfectly and will fix the shutter for free as long as I own the camera. Could they initially been more upfront? Of course. Did they eventually do the right thing. Yes. Good enough for me.

Of course, there are an incredible amount of non nikon owners at DPR that love to shred on them every chance, real wing nuts. They are overjoyed by this.

Same here... current D600 owner (and very happy with it for over a year with zero spots) who has owned over a dozen Nikon cameras in the last 30 years. Their N Series lenses are razor freakin sharp. I shoot magazine covers and have won half a dozen awards. It's the Canon fanboys you are referencing... 'haters gonna hate'... :P My work is here: http://www.modelmayhem.com/2623

Direct link | Posted on Jun 5, 2014 at 20:57 UTC
On Chinese government orders Nikon to stop selling D600 article (230 comments in total)
In reply to:

TN Args: 87% and GOLD Award from dpreview, your most trusty and reliable guide for picking out the good cameras from the bad ones -- not.

From page 23 of the dpr review:"Something that we've definitely got our eye on though, and which we'll be in a better position to comment on over time, is the D600's apparent tendency to attract sensor dust. We're working with Nikon to understand (and further test) this issue and we'll update this review accordingly as we use the camera over time.".

It is now 16 months since that review, and 5 months since Nikon actually replaced this defective model with the D610, and *STILL* not a word on the dpreview review site.

Agreeing with Alex above... also D600 owner with zero dust problems.... the camera takes FANTASTIC images. Canon fanboys need to EXIT Nikon related threads... ;)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 23, 2014 at 09:40 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 Review preview (482 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sad Joe: PLUS: Whopper Spec CONS: Whopper Price. VERDICT: ?

This is NOT Burger King and you can't have it 'your way'... ;D

Direct link | Posted on Mar 22, 2014 at 16:04 UTC
On Nikon D4s unboxing: It's arrived! article (265 comments in total)
In reply to:

Leandros S: On the subject of unboxing, how's that Pentax K-3 review coming along? People have been waiting...

DPReview knows a failing digital camera company when they see it... so why waste time on a review. Pentax and Olympus both will go down in flames in less than 2 years. The 'Big Two' are eating them alive.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 14, 2014 at 15:08 UTC
On Nikon D5300 Review preview (251 comments in total)
In reply to:

D1N0: So now I am going to be a bitch and ask for a Pentax K-50 and K-3 Review because this is not a serious camera but a gadget vehicle.

The reason Pentax DSLR's are NOT on the quick review list is because Pentax will BE OUT OF BUSINESS IN TWO YEARS! Regardless of how much better YOU THINK the Pentax line is... bottom line time... their cameras ARE NOT SELLING! Pentax seriously SUCKS in both marketing and distribution. Same goes for Olympus DSLR's as they will ALSO be gone IN TWO YEARS or less. You heard it here first... ;)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2014 at 06:37 UTC
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2381 comments in total)
In reply to:

Leon Lusignan: Sony's sensors s.ks again. I tried them both bad colors with bad corners and smearing.
Only 2 ff sensors on market from D4 Nikon's and 6D from Canon's.
In crops world Fuji is real one. You can see by yourself Kernocks test here:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/comparisons/2013-12-leica-sony-canon/index.htm

Try this... max out your Sony & Fuji images with the best editing skills you possess... and you won't even come close to the amazing dynamic range, low noise quality and superior resolution of the NIKON D5200... ;)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 3, 2014 at 03:16 UTC
On DxOMark investigates lenses for the Nikon D600 article (14 comments in total)

DXO's lens testing for the D600 reads like the who's who of every Nikon lens from $1200-$3000 and more... which is about as useful for me as a flat tire. I ain't shellin out 1000's of dollars on lenses for the most reasonably price FX camera in their lineup. Why didn't they test some of the more reasonably prices lenses that me and the rest of the world can afford?... :P

I own several of the lower priced Nikon lenses (like the 70-300 ED-VR) that I think work quite well on my D600... ;)

Direct link | Posted on May 22, 2013 at 06:35 UTC as 6th comment
On Just Posted: Nikon D7100 in-depth review article (397 comments in total)
In reply to:

oeriies: I've been using the D7100 for 3 weeks with a 500mm f/4G and a 35mm f/1.8G. I've been a Pentax user for a while, currently owning a K-5. There is a lot of detail in the D7100 shots, which is important for birds and wildlife, and the continuous autofocus system is a dream compared to the K-5. The bummer is the buffer, as others have noted and as is clear in the DPReview appraisal. I spent an hour shooting seagulls in flight the second day I had the camera just to try to learn my new gear. I knew from the specs that I should get 6fps shooting raw. Fired off a burst to catch an on-coming bird -- 5 shoots and the camera stopped dead. I thought that for sure I had a defective unit. It was only when I went to the user forum here that I found that this is how the camera is designed. Nikon, you've got to be kidding. I hope there is at least a partial fix via software for the buffer problem that we'll see soon. It is a crippling flaw in an otherwise excellent camera.

Who the hell shoots dozens of birds in flight at 6fps in RAW?!?!?!? Oh paleeeeeeze... like your gonna print billboard sized images of that stuff... LOL! Dude... switch your D7100 over to hi-res JPEG and shoot 1000s of shots without missin a beat. You'll still have huge files to edit.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 29, 2013 at 04:25 UTC
On Nikon D5200 added to our studio comparison database article (186 comments in total)
In reply to:

bobbarber: @GarysInSoCal

The E-M5 jpegs are better than than the D5200 jpegs in the comparison tool.

I am skeptical that the D5200 can do as well as any m43 camera. Since you are "sure", here is how you can prove it: 1) Download the D5200 raw samples from the comparison tool, 2) make whatever adjustments you would like in Photoshop, documenting the steps so that people can repeat what you did and verify the results, and 3) post the improved jpegs from the D5200, showing that they are better than what you can get out of the E-M5 at stock settings.

That would end all argument, wouldn't it?

Which leads me to this point... WHY aren't ALL tests conducted with the same prime focal length lens? Therein lies an obvious flaw in the conducted tests... :/

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2013 at 16:42 UTC
On Nikon D5200 added to our studio comparison database article (186 comments in total)
In reply to:

bobbarber: @GarysInSoCal

The E-M5 jpegs are better than than the D5200 jpegs in the comparison tool.

I am skeptical that the D5200 can do as well as any m43 camera. Since you are "sure", here is how you can prove it: 1) Download the D5200 raw samples from the comparison tool, 2) make whatever adjustments you would like in Photoshop, documenting the steps so that people can repeat what you did and verify the results, and 3) post the improved jpegs from the D5200, showing that they are better than what you can get out of the E-M5 at stock settings.

That would end all argument, wouldn't it?

Dude... there IS no argument. I have 6 likes (people who agree with me)... and as of this posting, you have ZERO. I win by 'concensus of opinion'... LOL!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2013 at 15:47 UTC
On Nikon D5200 added to our studio comparison database article (186 comments in total)

In the hands of a competent Nikon JPEG menu adjuster, combined with someone who can edit JPEGs to perfection, while using a sharp quality lens (Nikon 17-55 or 16-85 comes to mind), I'm SURE results coming out of the Nikon 5200's sensor will render images that are superior to anything in the 4/3s format, or anything coming out of Canon's current APS-C camp. I know this because I've been shootin JPEG magazine covers with Nikon cameras for several years now (samples on my MM page). Listen to the reviewers at DPReview & DXOMark... for they have no reason to lie to you concerning the performance of this camera & sensor. They are time-tested, proficient camera & sensor evaluators, and are NOT paid by Nikon to fabricate results. I've purchased several cameras based on their reviews, and have yet to be dissapointed with any past purchase (current owner of D600). It's my opinion that those wishin to find fault in their testings are merely fanboys of another camera manufacturer.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2013 at 05:29 UTC as 3rd comment | 1 reply

WOW... well call my D600 a freak... but I've got over 3000 shutter clicks on it since I bought it... zero dust or oil spots anywhere... and I've checked the sensor twice this week. Sorry Canon fanboys... very happy D600 owner here.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 23, 2012 at 19:11 UTC as 73rd comment | 2 replies
On Just Posted: Nikon D600 In-depth Review article (499 comments in total)
In reply to:

GarysInSoCal: I waited and waited for what I saw as a worthwhile (and affordable) replacement for my beloved D700... and I have finally found it. Been shooting with the D600 for over 2 months now... LOVE IT! At first I didnt think the extra resolution (12 megapixal VS 24 megapixal) was something that I really needed... but man-o-man was I WRONG! And this camera works even better in low light. Have recently shoot some 64,000 ISO images deep in a local forest with minimal noise... VERY HAPPY with those results as I couldn't accomplish that with my D700. Lenses I've recently used on it with amazing results are the 24-120 F4 Nanocoat ED-VR, 16-35 Nanocoat ED-VR and the 70-300 ED-VR. NO spotty sensor issue and I'm extremely happy with this purchase.

Yes... meant 6400 ISO... thanks for the correction... ;)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 19, 2012 at 09:18 UTC
On Just Posted: Nikon D600 In-depth Review article (499 comments in total)

I waited and waited for what I saw as a worthwhile (and affordable) replacement for my beloved D700... and I have finally found it. Been shooting with the D600 for over 2 months now... LOVE IT! At first I didnt think the extra resolution (12 megapixal VS 24 megapixal) was something that I really needed... but man-o-man was I WRONG! And this camera works even better in low light. Have recently shoot some 64,000 ISO images deep in a local forest with minimal noise... VERY HAPPY with those results as I couldn't accomplish that with my D700. Lenses I've recently used on it with amazing results are the 24-120 F4 Nanocoat ED-VR, 16-35 Nanocoat ED-VR and the 70-300 ED-VR. NO spotty sensor issue and I'm extremely happy with this purchase.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 16, 2012 at 19:34 UTC as 30th comment | 6 replies
On Hands-on with the AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/4G ED VR article (258 comments in total)
In reply to:

luxborealis: My initial reaction was "What a rip-off" $224 more for the tripod collar/mount - that make the total package over $1600. To compare it to the $2100 ƒ2.8 - the extra $400-500 is worth it.

If they were to just make the tripod collar included in the lens, economies of scale would drop the price well below $200. It tells you that in this case, Nikon is more about marketing and price points than photography. I know they are in competition with Canon, but really, this is petty.

HOWEVER - The lack of a collar is also a general comment on photography. Fewer photographers these days are willing to go the extra mile by using a tripod. By far, most who buy this lens will never use a tripod or monopod. Are VR and higher really that good that a tripod is no longer needed? For some work, yes. For most, photography is a weekend hobby that doesn't warrant the additional quality possible with a tripod - so why bother including a tripod collar when most won't really need it.

With the 3rd generation VR in this lens with a 5 F-stop range... who needs a tripod collar?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 27, 2012 at 18:39 UTC
On Nikon D600 Hands-on Preview preview (718 comments in total)
In reply to:

TJGKG: The D7000 seems to have better image results in the studio comparison than the D600. Maybe I'll keep mine after all and just upgrade the lenses to FX. It will be interesting to read the full review. So far I am not that impressed.

Picked up D600 last month... have found what Dyun27 has stated to be 'right on the money'. My old D60 (have since sold it) got blown away in overall performance by my D7000... and now my D7000 is getting blown away in every way by this D600... sample image (bikini babe Hallie) is here: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/GaryAbigt/Hallie1.jpg

Direct link | Posted on Oct 14, 2012 at 17:53 UTC
Total: 24, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »