Forever Young

Forever Young

Lives in United Arab Emirates Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Works as a Photography Student Forever
Joined on Jul 24, 2010

Comments

Total: 26, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Beta: try out our new 'light' color scheme (722 comments in total)

Bad, really bad... The original is much better...

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2016 at 03:41 UTC as 197th comment
On article The new Canon 35mm F1.4L II will be a thing of beauty (230 comments in total)

When the Sigma 1.4 ART lens came it, it got very good reviews, probably much better reviews than the previous Canon 35mm L had. How does that compare to this lens?

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2015 at 06:02 UTC as 11th comment | 2 replies
On article Canon issues product advisory for Rebel T6i/T6s (143 comments in total)

I am a Canon fan boy, see my gears, and I still think that Canon is great, but how is it possible that they start selling a camera with such obvious problems? And it happens from time to time...! Yes, other companies, incl. Nikon, also had serious issues in the past, but my question is the same to all of them. How is it possible that Canon, or Nikon, etc. sell defective products?

Link | Posted on May 9, 2015 at 14:49 UTC as 14th comment | 5 replies
On article Kodak announces IM5 Android smartphone (44 comments in total)

Kodak? And Phone? - No, thank you...! I would even think twice to buy anything from Kodak if it was a camera!!! They certainly are dreaming and have not hired a good marketing manager, irrespective of how 'good' the phone actually is...

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2015 at 09:12 UTC as 8th comment | 1 reply
On article Rare Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6L USM goes on sale in UK (218 comments in total)
In reply to:

Frank_BR: Out of curiosity, I did the math. To buy at list price the full line of Canon lenses with 74 models, you would spend $146,281, which is less than the $160,000 asked for this single Canon 1200mm F5.6 lens!

Great idea! Thanks for putting it in perspective! This lens is really a joke...

Link | Posted on Aug 17, 2014 at 15:14 UTC
On article Nikon 1 V3 stock shortage prompts official apology (288 comments in total)
In reply to:

Forever Young: Marketing 101: Create artificial shortage to make your product more appealing.

No wonder why Nikon had not expected such a success...

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2014 at 15:32 UTC
On article Nikon 1 V3 stock shortage prompts official apology (288 comments in total)

Marketing 101: Create artificial shortage to make your product more appealing.

Link | Posted on Jul 8, 2014 at 15:28 UTC as 43rd comment | 2 replies
On article What is equivalence and why should I care? (2177 comments in total)
In reply to:

forpetessake: Will this article finally stop those f2=f2=f2 stupid arguments? I doubt it. Stupid arguments come from stupid people: those same people who were explained the equivalence to many times before without any success.

p.2. of the article: " Four Thirds camera with a 50mm f/2 lens at ISO100 should produce a JPEG of the same brightness as a Full frame camera with a 100mm f/2 lens at ISO100 and, set to the same F-number and shutter speed" - the exposure settings - aperture, shutter speed, ISO - will be the same on both cameras. In this regards f/2=f/2 even if the FF picture will be more pleasing due to have 4x more total light.

Link | Posted on Jul 7, 2014 at 19:07 UTC

Then we can print the images on a curved photo paper...! :-)

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 10:46 UTC as 92nd comment | 5 replies
On article Portfolio: Photography student Luke Evans (157 comments in total)

It would be interesting to see what experts of the Rorschach test would say about him (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rorschach_test) - especially photos 4,7,10,11,12 - and about the people who think these are astonishing?

Link | Posted on May 30, 2014 at 08:32 UTC as 9th comment
In reply to:

vladimir vanek: Canon fan here: That looks really good!!!

Until you compare it to the Canon G1 X Mark II...

Link | Posted on May 18, 2014 at 18:46 UTC

Considering the Canon equivalent is exceptionally great, I wonder why they priced it this way? Just because it is black?

Link | Posted on May 16, 2014 at 11:18 UTC as 44th comment

Forgive my ignorance...Where can I enjoy 4K Video? My TVs are only HD, my computer monitors are HD! What is the benefit of 4K Video over 2K? So I can crop? In still photography it makes sense to have higher and higher resolution, up to a limit of course, as I can have large prints with high MP photos, but for videos? Is there any 'everyday' benefit of having 4K over HD? Will they look nicer on a HD screen? Or it is only for professional film making and large screens? If so, why put in in an amateur body?

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 11:59 UTC as 51st comment | 9 replies
On article Hungarian law bans photos taken without consent (321 comments in total)

The market of superzoom cameras will increase...!

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2014 at 19:49 UTC as 107th comment

Is it available in different colors? I want to buy all of them!

Link | Posted on Feb 4, 2014 at 02:19 UTC as 192nd comment
On article High-end pocketable compacts roundup (2013) (266 comments in total)

Which category shall the Canon G16 fall in?

Link | Posted on Nov 26, 2013 at 08:42 UTC as 83rd comment | 1 reply
On article Camera roundups: What to buy and why (286 comments in total)

Comparing apples and oranges,,,

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2013 at 17:40 UTC as 111th comment

"70-200s of all makes among least reliable lenses"

OR

the most abused ones... which is not a surprise, as possibly that is the range most people find themselves to shoot at...

Link | Posted on Aug 13, 2013 at 20:29 UTC as 38th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

nixda: Here are two things I'd like to see in a camera that haven't been mentioned before:

1. Square sensor. The image circle is a, um, circle, so why tossing out valuable sensor real estate? Aspect ratios can be selected via the menu or in post-processing, if desired. Also, one wouldn't have to struggle with landscape vs. portrait orientation and all that brings with it when it comes to holding a camera or mounting it to tripod heads.

2. The edges of the bottom plate should be shaped to be compatible with the Arca-Swiss standard.

How about a sensor that has circle shape? Then we would not 'lose' any information...

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2012 at 11:50 UTC
Total: 26, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »