Forever Young

Forever Young

Lives in United Arab Emirates Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Works as a Photography Student Forever
Joined on Jul 24, 2010
About me:

Hungarian professor teaching at an Emirati University as an expatriate


Total: 22, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Nikon 1 V3 stock shortage prompts official apology article (288 comments in total)
In reply to:

Forever Young: Marketing 101: Create artificial shortage to make your product more appealing.

No wonder why Nikon had not expected such a success...

Direct link | Posted on Jul 8, 2014 at 15:32 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 stock shortage prompts official apology article (288 comments in total)

Marketing 101: Create artificial shortage to make your product more appealing.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 8, 2014 at 15:28 UTC as 41st comment | 2 replies
On What is equivalence and why should I care? article (1722 comments in total)
In reply to:

forpetessake: Will this article finally stop those f2=f2=f2 stupid arguments? I doubt it. Stupid arguments come from stupid people: those same people who were explained the equivalence to many times before without any success.

p.2. of the article: " Four Thirds camera with a 50mm f/2 lens at ISO100 should produce a JPEG of the same brightness as a Full frame camera with a 100mm f/2 lens at ISO100 and, set to the same F-number and shutter speed" - the exposure settings - aperture, shutter speed, ISO - will be the same on both cameras. In this regards f/2=f/2 even if the FF picture will be more pleasing due to have 4x more total light.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 7, 2014 at 19:07 UTC

Then we can print the images on a curved photo paper...! :-)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2014 at 10:46 UTC as 90th comment | 5 replies
On Portfolio: Photography student Luke Evans article (172 comments in total)

It would be interesting to see what experts of the Rorschach test would say about him ( - especially photos 4,7,10,11,12 - and about the people who think these are astonishing?

Direct link | Posted on May 30, 2014 at 08:32 UTC as 6th comment
In reply to:

vladimir vanek: Canon fan here: That looks really good!!!

Until you compare it to the Canon G1 X Mark II...

Direct link | Posted on May 18, 2014 at 18:46 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)

Now I understand the pricing strategy of the Canon G1 X Mark II better! Although EVF is an extra cost, the zoom range of the Canon is much longer, and the sensor is also larger. It will be interesting to see a review side by side, but the Canon has a chance to perform better...

Direct link | Posted on May 17, 2014 at 05:07 UTC as 537th comment | 5 replies

Considering the Canon equivalent is exceptionally great, I wonder why they priced it this way? Just because it is black?

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2014 at 11:18 UTC as 43rd comment

Forgive my ignorance...Where can I enjoy 4K Video? My TVs are only HD, my computer monitors are HD! What is the benefit of 4K Video over 2K? So I can crop? In still photography it makes sense to have higher and higher resolution, up to a limit of course, as I can have large prints with high MP photos, but for videos? Is there any 'everyday' benefit of having 4K over HD? Will they look nicer on a HD screen? Or it is only for professional film making and large screens? If so, why put in in an amateur body?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 11:59 UTC as 51st comment | 9 replies
On Hungarian law bans photos taken without consent article (325 comments in total)

The market of superzoom cameras will increase...!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2014 at 19:49 UTC as 107th comment

Is it available in different colors? I want to buy all of them!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2014 at 02:19 UTC as 187th comment
On High-end pocketable compacts 2013 roundup article (128 comments in total)

Which category shall the Canon G16 fall in?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 26, 2013 at 08:42 UTC as 36th comment | 1 reply
On Camera roundups 2013: What to buy and why article (265 comments in total)

Comparing apples and oranges,,,

Direct link | Posted on Nov 23, 2013 at 17:40 UTC as 95th comment
On Preview:canon-eos-70d (1333 comments in total)

Could you, please, do similar tests for the 7D?

Posted on Oct 11, 2013 at 03:41 UTC as 121st comment

"70-200s of all makes among least reliable lenses"


the most abused ones... which is not a surprise, as possibly that is the range most people find themselves to shoot at...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 13, 2013 at 20:29 UTC as 38th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

nixda: Here are two things I'd like to see in a camera that haven't been mentioned before:

1. Square sensor. The image circle is a, um, circle, so why tossing out valuable sensor real estate? Aspect ratios can be selected via the menu or in post-processing, if desired. Also, one wouldn't have to struggle with landscape vs. portrait orientation and all that brings with it when it comes to holding a camera or mounting it to tripod heads.

2. The edges of the bottom plate should be shaped to be compatible with the Arca-Swiss standard.

How about a sensor that has circle shape? Then we would not 'lose' any information...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 20, 2012 at 11:50 UTC

New features look very interesting, good luck to you!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 28, 2012 at 05:50 UTC as 244th comment
In reply to:

pete zeugma: only problem I haveever had is the camera groupings.
please return the 1D forum to 1D only cameras and create a 5D/6D petty squabble forum

I agree, that would be great!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 28, 2012 at 05:48 UTC
In reply to:


Apart from bringing down the price of other mirrorless cameras, this is a total waste of time, money and effort, but I am quite happy the prices of other mirrorless cameras will come down.

Boring, NEX

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 23:07 UTC
In reply to:

Jim Radcliffe: Well, it appears to be exactly what I expected Canon to produce. No viewfinder and not really pocketable unless you are using the kit lens and have a good sized pocket (for camera and cash).

It's good they used the APSC sensor but honestly, if I were going to mount a 70-200mm on anything the body would have be more substantial than this. What is the point of a small, mirrorless camera using EF lenses other than to please those who already have those lenses?

To me this seems to have been thrown together just so Canon can say they have a mirrorless "system". The entire design seems to be aimed at NOT having any impact on their DSLR line. I think Fuji has a better concept.

I'm sure it will be "perfect" for many who already have invested in Canon glass and those who are within the Canon fold.

Canon is my choice over all other brands as far as a DSLR is concerned, but Sony is my choice of mirrorless. I have invested a lot in Canon because of their superior DSLR lenses, and I think the kit lens of f/2 of this new camera and the APS-C format was a good choice, but the lack of electronic viewfinder and a range of native M mount lenses will turn many potential customers completely off, including myself. Sorry Canon, but I will continue to have two systems... Sony is way ahead of you in this field...

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 23:05 UTC
Total: 22, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »