slick83

slick83

Lives in Czech Republic Czech Republic
Joined on Oct 5, 2010

Comments

Total: 15, showing: 1 – 15

Ultimate Selfie @5:46 :-D

Direct link | Posted on Jun 16, 2014 at 08:24 UTC as 5th comment
On Lensbaby releases 5.8mm F3.5 circular fisheye lens article (20 comments in total)

"Polished internal barrel for creative flare & reflection"

Oh boy ..... :-(

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2014 at 09:51 UTC as 6th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

moimoi: It is quite inconspicuous, isn't it?

@KariIceland:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-lCuTuh-Twpw/Ud3MYNcM0PI/AAAAAAAANzQ/_d6gly9h_OU/s1600/gta-the-joke.gif

:-)

edit:typo

Direct link | Posted on Dec 18, 2013 at 14:50 UTC
On Canon Korea teases new camera, EOS M2 or SL1/100D? article (257 comments in total)

White colour version of SL1/100D in 10 ... 9... 8 ...

Direct link | Posted on Nov 11, 2013 at 16:56 UTC as 34th comment

Finally!, no finger-print-ugliness will ruin my otherwise flawless image.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 5, 2013 at 07:49 UTC as 41st comment

fools and their money are easily parted

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2013 at 06:56 UTC as 125th comment
In reply to:

falconeyes: 20-1200 mm F/16-33

and according to optyczne.pl, it isn't even sharper at F/33 than F/47.

Can't see any other application than bright daylight video from a tripod ...

... in full frame terms, perhaps?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 19, 2013 at 13:38 UTC
On Carl Zeiss drops 'Carl', becomes 'ZEISS' article (116 comments in total)

Carl would not be happy about it. Just sayin ...

Direct link | Posted on Jul 2, 2013 at 11:59 UTC as 13th comment
On Preview:sony-cybershot-dsc-rx100-m2 (189 comments in total)

Since they say it's aimed at enthusiasts I hope they will let us disable pre-flash this time. That is the one and only gripe I have with mine RX100.

Posted on Jun 27, 2013 at 08:47 UTC as 65th comment
In reply to:

Combatmedic870: Im guessing looks just like the 700D and 60D and 7D and 600D and...EOS M*shrugs*

Please elaborate. Thank you.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2013 at 07:29 UTC
On Pro DSLRs, Pro Photographers article (126 comments in total)

Thank you very much DPR. This is the best feature to date I have ever read on DPR Keep up the good work. Thanks again.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 13, 2013 at 12:08 UTC as 39th comment
On Pentax launches WG-3 and WG-3 GPS waterproof cameras article (66 comments in total)

I hope since the last generation they have fixed the following:

"Avoid contact with garbage, mud, sand, dust, water, toxic gases or salts. These could cause the camera to breakdown. Wipe the camera to dry off any rain or water drops"

source -> http://c758710.r10.cf2.rackcdn.com/files/support/manual/1330537010_Manual_WG-2_EN_official.pdf

Direct link | Posted on Jan 30, 2013 at 11:49 UTC as 15th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

slick83: Since I am in the market for rugged compact camera that will survive mu busy urban/rural life. I took my time to check Nikon's site for some details.

According to Nikon site:

-= Waterproof =-
* on camera body itself 18m/59ft:
http://cdn-4.nikon-cdn.com/en_INC/o/ET360lcITrS5AL5UdjBwI83CY_Y/Views/26412_AW110_front.png

* in specs sheet:
JIS/IEC protection class 8 (IPX8) equivalent (under our testing conditions)
Up to a depth of 5 m (16.4 ft) and for 60 minutes

link -> http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Product/Compact-Digital-Cameras/26412/COOLPIX-AW110.html

Hmmm, I wonder, is it really 18m/59ft ?

OK, since AW110 user manual is not published, yet, I have looked into user manual of its predecessor [AW100] and it goes like this:

-= Notes on waterproof and dust-proof performances =-
The camera is equivalent to IEC/JIS waterproof grade 8 (IPX8) and IEC/JIS dustproof
grade 6 (IP6X) and enables shooting pictures underwater at a depth of 10 m (33 ft)
for up to 60 minutes.*

This rating does not guarantee the waterproof performance of the camera or that
the camera will be free from damage or trouble under all conditions.

* This rating indicates that the camera has been designed to withstand the specified water pressure
for thespecified period of time when the camera is used according to the methods defined by
Nikon.

link -> http://www.nikonusa.com/pdf/manuals/kie88335f7869dfuejdl=-cww2/AW100EN.pdf

Direct link | Posted on Jan 30, 2013 at 06:59 UTC
In reply to:

slick83: Since I am in the market for rugged compact camera that will survive mu busy urban/rural life. I took my time to check Nikon's site for some details.

According to Nikon site:

-= Waterproof =-
* on camera body itself 18m/59ft:
http://cdn-4.nikon-cdn.com/en_INC/o/ET360lcITrS5AL5UdjBwI83CY_Y/Views/26412_AW110_front.png

* in specs sheet:
JIS/IEC protection class 8 (IPX8) equivalent (under our testing conditions)
Up to a depth of 5 m (16.4 ft) and for 60 minutes

link -> http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Product/Compact-Digital-Cameras/26412/COOLPIX-AW110.html

Hmmm, I wonder, is it really 18m/59ft ?

@hydrospanner

Have you even read my post, sir?
Or is it like that simply because there is no "IPX9-10-11-12" rating to they use IPX8 instead?

What I point out is the obvious difference in numbers they published.

The number printed on the camera body is different than the one "printed" in the specs sheet on their own web site.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2013 at 15:41 UTC

Since I am in the market for rugged compact camera that will survive mu busy urban/rural life. I took my time to check Nikon's site for some details.

According to Nikon site:

-= Waterproof =-
* on camera body itself 18m/59ft:
http://cdn-4.nikon-cdn.com/en_INC/o/ET360lcITrS5AL5UdjBwI83CY_Y/Views/26412_AW110_front.png

* in specs sheet:
JIS/IEC protection class 8 (IPX8) equivalent (under our testing conditions)
Up to a depth of 5 m (16.4 ft) and for 60 minutes

link -> http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Product/Compact-Digital-Cameras/26412/COOLPIX-AW110.html

Hmmm, I wonder, is it really 18m/59ft ?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2013 at 11:48 UTC as 8th comment | 4 replies
Total: 15, showing: 1 – 15