slick83

Finally!, no finger-print-ugliness will ruin my otherwise flawless image.

fools and their money are easily parted

... in full frame terms, perhaps?

Carl would not be happy about it. Just sayin ...

Since they say it's aimed at enthusiasts I hope they will let us disable pre-flash this time. That is the one and only gripe I have with mine RX100.

Please elaborate. Thank you.

Thank you very much DPR. This is the best feature to date I have ever read on DPR Keep up the good work. Thanks again.

I hope since the last generation they have fixed the following:

"Avoid contact with garbage, mud, sand, dust, water, toxic gases or salts. These could cause the camera to breakdown. Wipe the...

OK, since AW110 user manual is not published, yet, I have looked into user manual of its predecessor [AW100] and it goes like this:

-= Notes on waterproof and dust-proof performances =-
The camera...

@hydrospanner

Have you even read my post, sir?

What I point out is the obvious difference in numbers they published.

The number printed on the camera body is different than the one "printed"...

@hydrospanner

Have you even read my post, sir?
Or is it like that simply because there is no "IPX9-10-11-12" rating to they use IPX8 instead?

What I point out is the obvious difference in numbers...

Since I am in the market for rugged compact camera that will survive mu busy urban/rural life. I took my time to check Nikon's site for some details.

According to Nikon site:

-= Waterproof =-
*...