Neodp

"it's not a failure of a system."

Yes, it is. A failure to really compete.

Note: I shoot Raw, and USUALLY, just pulling the embedded JPEG out.

P.S. Get it Gimp pimped! You got your ufraw (16 bit optionally) going in, and many, many easy plug-ins available, for Gimp, for...

Note: I shoot Raw, and USUALLY, just pulling the embedded JPEG out.

P.S. Get it Gimp pimped! You got your ufraw (16 bit optionally) going in, and many, many easy plug-ins available, for Gimp, for...

Note: I shoot Raw, and USUALLY, just pulling the embedded JPEG out. This depends on the final goals.

P.S. Get it Gimp pimped! You got your ufraw (16 bit optionally) going in, and many, many easy...

Also, a bigger overall sensor, *does* typically, and understandably cost more; but need not cost so many times more. Not like we have now. The excess is a lie, simply promoting excessive profits...

Also, a bigger overall sensor, *does* typically, and understandably cost more; but need not cost so many times more. Not like we have now. The excess is a lie, simply promoting excessive profits...

OK, is high time we give the, "pixel peeper" declaration, a rest. I mean generally everyone.

Why? Because yes; at some point, it is indeed good enough. However, we are no where near there, now,....

OK, it is high time we give the, "pixel peeper" declaration, a rest. I mean generally everyone.

Why? Because yes; at some point, it is indeed good enough. However, we are no where near there,...

OK, it is high time we give the, "pixel peeper" declaration, a rest. I mean generally everyone.

Why? Because yes; at some point, it is indeed good enough. However, we are no where near there,...

OK, it is high time we give the, "pixel peeper" declaration, a rest. I mean generally everyone.

Why? Because yes; at some point, it is indeed good enough. However, we are no where near there,...

OK, it is high time we give the, "pixel peeper" declaration, a rest. I mean generally everyone.

Why? Because yes; at some point, it is indeed good enough. However, we are no where near there,...

OK, it is high time we give the, "pixel peeper" declaration, a rest. I mean generally everyone.

Why? Because yes; at some point, it is indeed good enough. However, we are no where near there,...

OK, it is high time we give the, "pixel peeper" declaration, a rest. I mean generally everyone.

Why? Because yes; at some point, it is indeed good enough. However, we are no where near there,...

OK, it is high time we give the, "pixel peeper" declaration, a rest. I mean generally everyone.

Why? Because yes; at some point, it is indeed good enough. However, we are no where near there,...

Makes one wonder; why can't Nikon, and Canon etc..., can't do better.

Once you Finder, you never go back.

Once you Finder, you never go back.

Yes, that means we need a rangefinder like EVF(improved); that does not add bulk.

Once you Finder, you never go back.

Yes, that means we need a rangefinder like EVF(improved); that does not add bulk.

But of course, not just that.

No look. I can't complain, after a camera I buy, then sees an improved version, and for less. That's progress; even if I missed it.

Having (good) diversity, for differing (good) preferences, is a...

No look. I can't complain, after a camera I buy, then see an improved version, and for less. That's progress; even if I missed it.

Having (good) diversity, for differing (good) preferences, is a...