Jeff Keller

Jeff Keller

Lives in United States Seattle, WA, United States
Works as a Senior Writer, Digital Photography Review
Has a website at http://www.dpreview.com
Joined on Feb 19, 2013
About me:

I'm the former publisher of the Digital Camera Resource Page who is now writing reviews and managing new product launches here at DPReview.

Comments

Total: 266, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
In reply to:

PiscesNH69: DPReview camera side by side comparison shows image ratios in A77MKII are 1:1, 4:3, and 16:9 compared to A77/A65's 3:2 and 16:9. Is this accurate?

Sorry, that was an error. Just 3:2 and 16:9.

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2014 at 14:28 UTC
On Updated: Creating the Leica T article (197 comments in total)
In reply to:

JonPB: Copyedit: "No one will argue that Leica cameras are expensive." (That's the lead sentence from the main page for this post.) I certainly would, but I believe what you meant is the opposite, that "No one will argue with the proposition that Leica cameras are expensive," which might be better phrased as "No one will deny that Leica cameras are expensive."

Good suggestion, thanks.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 22:34 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (451 comments in total)
In reply to:

dpr4bb: Thanks for the first-impressions review. How is the video on this camera? Does it use line-skipping to sub-sample the full frame captured by the sensor, or does it use full-sensor read-out?

I haven't shot much video yet, but I'm not terribly impressed with what I've seen thus far. The camera does not sample the whole sensor.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2014 at 23:17 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (451 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jay Williams: I can't believe dpreview has stooped to the level of using the word "selfie." What is this world coming to?

I'm just trying to relate to all the cool kids, man.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2014 at 21:15 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (451 comments in total)
In reply to:

Max@Home: Hello, may I point out one small error: the G1X definitely does NOT have a 'a control ring around the lens barrel' (second sentence of the article), the lens ring is detachable to make room for an accessorie 'close-up/macro-flash attachment ring', but it is no 'control ring' of any sort...

...€0.02...

Kindest regards,

Max@Home

Sorry about that, we'll fix it shortly.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2014 at 20:15 UTC
In reply to:

BelePhotography: pictures - found here http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n140416.html

I added a few images to tide everyone over until we get higher quality ones.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2014 at 05:26 UTC
In reply to:

BelePhotography: pictures - found here http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n140416.html

We didn't get any in advance, but as soon as they show up, they'll be added.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2014 at 05:15 UTC
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (654 comments in total)
In reply to:

MPA1: Page 2 - proof reader asleep!

I must be missing something. What's wrong?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2014 at 05:14 UTC
On Ricoh announces medium-format Pentax 645Z article (160 comments in total)
In reply to:

Couscousdelight: Thre is a error in your specs :
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror)
It's a prism, not a pentamirror.

Fixed, thanks.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 05:30 UTC
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (654 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zvonimir Tosic: So DPR editors, the title of the article states "Hands on with the Pentax 645Z". Did you have a hands on chance to record some images with this new camera? Were you allowed to see and download the output (considering camera is not available yet for purchase)?
Thank you.

Ricoh requested that we not post any photos taken with the camera.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 05:26 UTC
On Pentax K-3 Review preview (485 comments in total)
In reply to:

waxwaine: Thankyou DPR team for this extensive review. I sincerily hope it worth the hard work. Cheers.

Richard's new Maserati (with license plate PNTXLVR) definitely made it worth the hard work!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2014 at 18:10 UTC
In reply to:

Peiasdf: Is this an announcement or rumor? Not even a picture of the camera?

EDIT: nevermind. You added the press release now.

Since it wasn't announced in the US, we had no access to press materials. Still trying to round up some photos.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2014 at 04:40 UTC
In reply to:

Sangster: "The Nikon 1 J4 will be available outside of the U.S."

Does this mean Nikon is abandoning mirrorless for the masses in America?

I doubt it.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2014 at 04:10 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II real-world gallery article (132 comments in total)

Hi everyone, now that ACR 8.4 is out, I reconverted the 'torture tunnel' shot and also tried my hand at the ISO 8000 indoor statue photo. Wide-open macro shot still to come.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 8, 2014 at 19:25 UTC as 11th comment | 2 replies
On Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II real-world gallery article (132 comments in total)
In reply to:

Menneisyys: Wowz!!! You already have two MkII's! DPR, please publish the final review before July! I want to purchase a new enthusiast "compact" before going on Holiday (this July) and still hesitate between this and the RX10. (And the rumoured P8000, of course.)

I'm working on the review now, so if it's not published by July, then something horrible has happened.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 8, 2014 at 18:08 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II real-world gallery article (132 comments in total)
In reply to:

Master Yoda: Hi Jeff . . . this is Dark Cobra from your old site. I was glad to see you return to Stanford and San Francisco for many of these shots and we are very used to many of these scenes from your old site. In general the images are at best "alright". I don't see anything that WoW's me at all to be honest. The bridge night scene is good as is the Stanford "tunnel of doom" shot which renders excellent shadow and light detail balance. The sharpness of most of these images could be better. I was thinking about getting this camera but I'm SO glad I resisted and picked up the incredible Fuji X100S. Take care of yourself Jeff!

Thanks guys. Unfortunately this won't be a trend - I just happened to be there over the weekend and thought "what the heck".

Direct link | Posted on Apr 8, 2014 at 05:10 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II real-world gallery article (132 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cheng Bao: When I saw the series photo of stanford U, I think these must be jeff's work, and it seems I guessed correctly.

No school guards hush you out of their property this time?

Nope, no security. If anyone should've been busted that day it should be all the wedding photographers shooting there without permission! (not that you should need it in the first place)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 8, 2014 at 05:07 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II real-world gallery article (132 comments in total)
In reply to:

qwertyasdf: Correct me if i'm wrong, the largest aperture used in this set is F3.2?

More photos still to come!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 8, 2014 at 05:06 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II real-world gallery article (132 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mikael Risedal: what the camera can do?

IMG_0130.dpp
blown high lights, no color resolution in the shadows , inferior DR
Crappy dynamic range

I can push the shadows up a bit more but anything more than that and things get weird. Hoping to get ACR soon.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 21:47 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II real-world gallery article (132 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mikael Risedal: what the camera can do?

IMG_0130.dpp
blown high lights, no color resolution in the shadows , inferior DR
Crappy dynamic range

As soon as I can get ahold of a version of ACR that supports the camera, I will reprocess it with the hope of better results.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 21:29 UTC
Total: 266, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »