Jeff Keller

Jeff Keller

Lives in United States Seattle, WA, United States
Works as a Senior Writer, Digital Photography Review
Has a website at http://www.dpreview.com
Joined on Feb 19, 2013
About me:

I'm the former publisher of the Digital Camera Resource Page who is now writing reviews and managing new product launches here at DPReview.

Comments

Total: 257, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Canon PowerShot D30 real-world samples gallery article (14 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rodrigo Ayres Bordin: Hi! Are all the underwater samples done without flash? For underwater pics, you could add the depth they were taken...

For some of the cameras the flash was used. I never needed it with the Canon, so I never forced it on.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2014 at 19:22 UTC
On Olympus Tough TG-3 real-world samples gallery article (42 comments in total)
In reply to:

ChrisAN82: dpreview staff: Did you happen to take any video with the TG-3? If so, could you hear a constant clicking noise during video playback? The TG-1 and TG-2 both suffered from this and it is believe to be caused by the microphone picking up the noise from the AF system.

We have some sample videos that will be posted soon. Just fooling around with it in the office, I didn't notice any clicking sounds.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2014 at 19:19 UTC
On Sony a6000 First Impressions Review preview (899 comments in total)
In reply to:

Paks: So wheres the review DP REVIEW?

It's coming very soon.

Direct link | Posted on May 19, 2014 at 03:59 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)
In reply to:

hawat: The minimum focus range is now 30 cm on the rx100m3 instead of 5cm in the previous generation?

That sentence was not entirely correct. The min. distance at telephoto is indeed 30cm. At wide-angle it's 5cm. I've cleared it up.

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2014 at 05:10 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III First Impressions Review preview (2979 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cheng Bao: RX100m2 got bionz x too? in your RX100 Series Comparison table.
I didn't recall sony claim rx100m2 to got the lastest bionz x. Can you double check?

@dpreview

Fixed the table. Only the Mark III uses Bionz X.

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2014 at 04:48 UTC
On Rumors hint at pair of new Canon lenses article (54 comments in total)
In reply to:

Antony John: Whilst there's a shortage of new products maybe DPR could:
1. Catch up on outstanding reviews (cameras and lenses).
2. Run some surveys to determine what 'real people' actually want the camera manufacturers to produce IRO cameras and lenses?
I would think that the camera manufacturers monitor these pages and perhaps it's a way of getting products onto the market that are more popular/generate more interest and increase sales?
Just a thought.

I can't speak to #2, but we are mostly certainly reviewing cameras which, as you know, takes time.

Direct link | Posted on May 13, 2014 at 02:56 UTC
On Samsung announces NX3000 mirrorless camera article (186 comments in total)
In reply to:

D1N0: ISO 2500 max? That must be a typo.

Fixed. thanks!

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2014 at 14:39 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (636 comments in total)
In reply to:

Betico: I'm happy to read the Jeff's reviews. He writes clear and to the point. I miss his comments about the battery door on his DPreview reviews. On his former website he never missed a comment regarding the bottom of the camera. His comments about the battery doors were very helpful. I guess DPreview does not allow him to write these comments now.

Pretty sure that our corporate overlords don't care about battery doors :-)

Richard and iI will discuss this tomorrow.

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2014 at 00:08 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (636 comments in total)
In reply to:

Henrik Herranen: Page 3 concerning the LCD:
"Outdoor visibility was very good."

Page 11 concerning the LCD:
"The display has average outdoor visibility (meaning not great)"

This appears a bit contradictory to me.

Other than that, interesting review.

Sorry about the confusion. Page 3 was written after spending a short amount of time with the camera. I had forgotten to go back and update that section after spending more time with the G1X II.

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2014 at 22:18 UTC
On Sony SLT-A77 II First Impressions Review preview (599 comments in total)
In reply to:

PiscesNH69: DPReview shows image ratios in A77MKII are 1:1, 4:3, and 16:9 compared to A77/A65's 3:2 and 16:9. Is this accurate?

That was an error, sorry about that.

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2014 at 14:35 UTC
On Sony SLT-A77 II First Impressions Review preview (599 comments in total)
In reply to:

Juck: MAybe I missed it,,, What's the burst/buffer depth for RAW,, anyone know?

It's around 25 shots.

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2014 at 14:29 UTC
In reply to:

PiscesNH69: DPReview camera side by side comparison shows image ratios in A77MKII are 1:1, 4:3, and 16:9 compared to A77/A65's 3:2 and 16:9. Is this accurate?

Sorry, that was an error. Just 3:2 and 16:9.

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2014 at 14:28 UTC
On Updated: Creating the Leica T article (197 comments in total)
In reply to:

JonPB: Copyedit: "No one will argue that Leica cameras are expensive." (That's the lead sentence from the main page for this post.) I certainly would, but I believe what you meant is the opposite, that "No one will argue with the proposition that Leica cameras are expensive," which might be better phrased as "No one will deny that Leica cameras are expensive."

Good suggestion, thanks.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 22:34 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (451 comments in total)
In reply to:

dpr4bb: Thanks for the first-impressions review. How is the video on this camera? Does it use line-skipping to sub-sample the full frame captured by the sensor, or does it use full-sensor read-out?

I haven't shot much video yet, but I'm not terribly impressed with what I've seen thus far. The camera does not sample the whole sensor.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2014 at 23:17 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (451 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jay Williams: I can't believe dpreview has stooped to the level of using the word "selfie." What is this world coming to?

I'm just trying to relate to all the cool kids, man.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2014 at 21:15 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Review preview (451 comments in total)
In reply to:

Max@Home: Hello, may I point out one small error: the G1X definitely does NOT have a 'a control ring around the lens barrel' (second sentence of the article), the lens ring is detachable to make room for an accessorie 'close-up/macro-flash attachment ring', but it is no 'control ring' of any sort...

...€0.02...

Kindest regards,

Max@Home

Sorry about that, we'll fix it shortly.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2014 at 20:15 UTC
In reply to:

BelePhotography: pictures - found here http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n140416.html

I added a few images to tide everyone over until we get higher quality ones.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2014 at 05:26 UTC
In reply to:

BelePhotography: pictures - found here http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n140416.html

We didn't get any in advance, but as soon as they show up, they'll be added.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2014 at 05:15 UTC
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (649 comments in total)
In reply to:

MPA1: Page 2 - proof reader asleep!

I must be missing something. What's wrong?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 16, 2014 at 05:14 UTC
On Ricoh announces medium-format Pentax 645Z article (157 comments in total)
In reply to:

Couscousdelight: Thre is a error in your specs :
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror)
It's a prism, not a pentamirror.

Fixed, thanks.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 05:30 UTC
Total: 257, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »