Jeff Keller

So not only was the item hidden - the specs were completely wrong. I've cleaned them up and everything should (hopefully) be accurate now. Thanks for pointing this out!

Yes. It's running ACR 8.2, so it supports the same cameras as regular Photoshop. ACR on Elements is stripped down a bit, though.

please see:
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/4416254604/camera-scores-ratings-explained

Namely "There is no direct link between the overall score and the awards: they are not given automatically...

Yes, the review is shorter, mainly because we're trying to crank these out faster.

I'd love to have the SF and Stanford photos in the gallery but it's too long a drive from Seattle!

Definitely did *not* find focus times to be anywhere near as bad as you describe.

Thanks for pointing that out, it's been fixed.

Yes, it's the heat rising from the ship's smokestack.

I'll talk to the boss and see if I can expense it.

Thanks!

Fixed, thx.

Yes but it's a very nice bald head!

Oops, that's kind of an important point. Added the price - $400 - to the story.

Wasn't that on Canon EOS film cameras?

I updated the news item to cover this issue. Apparently you have to contact customer service to 'discuss' it.

I just added a section about that in the news story. In short, you will be able to upgrade without issue.

Reworded that sentence to clarify.

Aim it at something and hope you're accurate.

This isn't an article about game changers. It's cameras that were interesting for one reason or another. There may be a game changer article in the near future, though.

I wrote this article in my spare time (over a weekend + a few nights), so it did not keep me from my reviewing duties.