-
So not only was the item hidden - the specs were completely wrong. I've cleaned them up and everything should (hopefully) be accurate now.
Thanks for pointing this out!
-
Yes. It's running ACR 8.2, so it supports the same cameras as regular Photoshop. ACR on Elements is stripped down a bit, though.
-
please see: http://www.dpreview.com/articles/4416254604/camera-scores-ratings-explained Namely "There is no direct link between the overall score and the awards: they are not given automatically...
-
Yes, the review is shorter, mainly because we're trying to crank these out faster.
-
I'd love to have the SF and Stanford photos in the gallery but it's too long a drive from Seattle!
-
Definitely did *not* find focus times to be anywhere near as bad as you describe.
-
Thanks for pointing that out, it's been fixed.
-
Yes, it's the heat rising from the ship's smokestack.
-
I'll talk to the boss and see if I can expense it.
-
-
-
Yes but it's a very nice bald head!
-
Oops, that's kind of an important point. Added the price - $400 - to the story.
-
Wasn't that on Canon EOS film cameras?
-
I updated the news item to cover this issue. Apparently you have to contact customer service to 'discuss' it.
-
I just added a section about that in the news story. In short, you will be able to upgrade without issue.
-
Reworded that sentence to clarify.
-
Aim it at something and hope you're accurate.
-
This isn't an article about game changers. It's cameras that were interesting for one reason or another. There may be a game changer article in the near future, though.
-
I wrote this article in my spare time (over a weekend + a few nights), so it did not keep me from my reviewing duties.
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
| Total messages |
19 |
| Threads started |
8 |
| Last post |
5 days ago |
| Total articles |
3 |
| Avg. helpfulness |
5.7 |
| Last article |
4 months ago |
|