my lacie sad 256 rugged performance like 200 mb and 350 mb in read/write speed....if i raid 2 or 3 of them with software i can easily reach the 500 / 700 mb results....4 sad and accelerator should produce a much solid performance. i love drobo idea but their performance are always sub par.
jonny1976: as expeted minimal gain and mostly after iso 25600 where the absolute quality is simply too low for quality work.
i'll hbet that as always panasonich gh4 apart high iso will produce better video than sony...so far sony has never been top in the list of videographers, due to frame rate codec rolling shutter...will see all these issue, much more important than simply low light.
as expeted minimal gain and mostly after iso 25600 where the absolute quality is simply too low for quality work.
xmeda: Pentax 645 system wins :D
already many pro using the old 645d and many will trade their back for the 645z. interchangeable backs are for photo wjho use field camera not many.
CameraLabTester: What a refreshing feeling to see a photography awards event devoid of war photos, conflict dramas, human atrocities, suffering and unhappiness.
Call it whatever you like, Sony has got it right.
personallu i find this story tells nothing about domestic violence...and i'm surprised all thiose prize awardd tho tis youn girll. first she said the story began like a story about the man and is rehabilitation, nothing happened between the woman an man in the months the photographer followed the couple, then one night they were drunk, after a night in a club, and they fight like can happen to thousand of couple, the girl had minimal sign of violence, and the photographer in fact keep shooting, very strange if the man was so angry and fury i doubt he would have left the photog take all those photos without trying to still the camera and card....then after police arrived and take the man, she arranged a story about the domestic violence. Smart girl for 21 years old, she managed to win many trophy and raise interest, but that story is highly manipulated in the deep sense of domestic violence.
normal video using tilt and shift lens....a revolution? i find it boring after 10 sec on.
watching the samples here it's clear these lenses are nothing up the leica film standard, probably not even far from micro third, who already use leica design....it's clear leica know there will be forever a niche of rich people who don't know where to throw money who will buy everything leica put out.treally. 7000 dollar for this camera with 2 lenses and a viewfinder...when a pentax 645z with kit is 8400.i find it pretty offensive if i were a leica user.
really ? is this erious?2000 for a plastic lens. 600 for a viewfinder?at this price better buys used m9 and some leica lenses...those with 2 aperture are cheaper
Paul Guba: I almost purchased the earlier version. Not being an amateur it lacked one notable feature not being able to be tethered. Seems like there is still issues with LR and unlikely Capture1 is going out of their way to support Pentax. Which makes it a no go as much as I would like to have it.
pentax 645d can be tethered with the image software sold by pentax
Jogger: The next jump in FF resolution will be 54mp; that combined with high-performing, modern lenses will keep a lot of people in the Nikon/Sony camp.
ff can't compete with medium format in iq, and is not about resolution. everybody who has shot mp and d800 already knows. in addiction i see only the bet loses some zeiss really delivering with the d800e
Thematic: Before anyone rants - this is a stunning value (as is the new BM cam). S35, Global shutter and a form factor perfect for its intended market. Fantastic work if they can get to market fast.
Steve_: There's an ongoing review? Why don't you make up your mind to start with whether you will review this camera or not? If this were a Nikon it would have been reviewed within weeks of its release.
our and our readers? really i hope this post show the real bias of this website to all the world. the k3 is the apse out there by any webstite a bit competent...not reviewing it means not giving a service to all the community.
what priorities?come on. it's clear. they reviews every camera out there even the sony rx100.it's unbelievable behavior from a website that was a point of reference for review. but they need profit. i understand.
this is simply an explanation that open and confirm the bias you have for some brands..those who let you make more money...i'm sorry but this is a shot on your foot.you reviewed everything before pentax k3, even the last remote accessory....but not k3? it's like 7 months you have to review this camera...but i'm sure it would have hurt some nikon sales so better delayed it.
i made a project sing studio light in kiev in december, i before anybody thought of this. then i come in february, seeing soft box and studio project everywhere in kiev, including a project t from my photo agency pretty similar to mine.maybe it will be interesting for you to have a look also at mine. i'm not famous as weber, but this project so far collected more than 3 cover in europe magazine.
Thorgrem: Nice camera for a nice price. But, where are the lenses? With big holes in the APS-C e-mount line up it's almost pointless to make more camera's than the entry-level (a3000, A5000).
these show 20 past lenses...most of them are simply double or triple of the same lens.there are at least 7 35 32 30...the zoom are all slow and the same or similar focal. the quality in most of them is weakthere no faster prime than 1,8. no prime after 55.look at fuji roadmap...12 lenses that cover all aspect of photography. the m43 now with the latest addictions is even more suited to all kind of photograph. with sealed lenses, fast primes in very situation.
the 7-14 2,8 for video is a beast also. coupled with a pocket magic...wow
fujoi know how to do camera...this is undisputable.
jonny1976: ccd is twhy a medium format is unbeleiveble even compared to any ff camera at base iso...im sure the mformata will lose this magic and resemble a d800 with just more pixel.stupid move
i suggest many here to rent a 645d with good glass, take their tripod and shoot some long exposure...the smoothness of the sky even at very long exposure is something to be seen. but i think many here never shoot or manage to work with mf files.personally i wait for samples but in my opinion mf is not high iso, for high iso i will use any dslr with fast lens, i don't need noisy raw file of 100 more mb. and i think the same think many phase one users.
in my opinion the rendering of ccd is better, and i'm not talking of pushing dynamic or color depth..simply when i look at d800 images i see a k5 image blow up, with my 645d am always blown out like i am with good foveon images. the same come from other pentax 645d user i know who own also the d800. it's a natural image, the raw are perfect no need to pp to produce excellent images in most of the light, superb reproduction of secular highlight also for studio work. cmos in all the camera i have used and k5 has more dr than 645d very similar to d800, seems to flatten all the images.