Joined on Aug 14, 2012


Total: 22, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

JEROME NOLAS: Another lens that will make me a better photographer....and yes, that click, click, click drives me crazy!!! :)

"25/0.95 can be hardly called a large aperture lens" ...


Direct link | Posted on Feb 14, 2014 at 01:39 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2792 comments in total)

I love Nikon - but they are still one of the most stupid companies in existence ... how could they screw the pooch this badly ?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 07:47 UTC as 363rd comment | 3 replies
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2371 comments in total)

How is this camera "much" smaller than a Leica m9 or M240 or Monochrom ?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 26, 2013 at 05:47 UTC as 291st comment | 2 replies
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2371 comments in total)

Angled/offset micro lenses ? We need to know ...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2013 at 06:40 UTC as 742nd comment
On Sony Alpha A7 / A7R preview (2371 comments in total)
In reply to:

locke_fc: I don't understand this sentence: "The thing about the A7 and A7R that concerns us the most is pricing. The bodies are fairly reasonable given their specifications..." Does it concern you or DID it concern you, but not anymore since the prices are fairly reasonable?
Anyway, these two look pretty amazing. An FF sensor in a small size, weather-proof, body with a tilting screen... potentially game-changing, provided the lenses keep coming along.

You needed to read beyond the "sentence" (actually it is two sentences) in order to understand it. What followed the discussion of the reasonable price for the body, was a discussion of the expense of the required/available lenses: "The lenses launched alongside the two new full-frame cameras are on the expensive side, with the F1.8 55mm Zeiss listed for $999. By comparison, you can buy a Nikon 50mm F1.4 for less than half that price."

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2013 at 06:39 UTC
On Nikon D7100 Hands-on Preview preview (492 comments in total)

How the HELL does the D71000 "offer[s] a nicely upgraded movie mode compared to the D7000" if "It gains 1080p30 shooting, rather than 24p" ??DPReview have been around video (and assessed video on cameras) for MORE than long enough to understand 24P is the most important video frame-rate currently available ... how is 30P an "upgrade" ??

Direct link | Posted on Feb 21, 2013 at 11:36 UTC as 178th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Donald Duck: New trend: interchangeable cameras instead of a cameras with interchangeable lenses...

What next - wide Sigma camera, fisheye one, etc.?

Close-up AND macro, solarsky ? Close-up, yes, at 1:3 ratio - but certainly not macro. As for "reproduction", well isn't all photography "reproduction", but if you mean in the sense of copying small items such as slides then, once again, no. A magnification of 1:3 would be insufficient for most reproduction purposes, unless you wished to reproduce items larger than a bank note.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2013 at 18:47 UTC
In reply to:

zodiacfml: This is probably made for macro work. While the focal length is nice for portraits, I will find the max aperture not enough to produce the bokeh that I like around f2.2 or larger. I'm pretty sure though that lens performance is even better than found on the DP2M.

MADE for macro work ?? When it can't even remotely reach a macro ratio ? Get a grip.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2013 at 18:41 UTC
In reply to:

Photonhunter: Camera clearly aimed at reproduction and product photography? Now, does this mean that we will get the 50/2.8 macro in Nex E-mount too in the near future...?? ;-)

Reproduction at 1:3 magnification ? Product photography at 1:3 AND with no tilt and shift ? Maybe it can be done in some scenarios, but it is CERTAINLY not "clearly aimed" at either scenario at all - not even nearly !!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2013 at 18:31 UTC
In reply to:

Future user: Well, by its specifications I guess the lens is more designed for macro than portraits, but I bet there won't be sharper and more detailed portraits than the ones taken by this DP3m. Per-pixel sharpness and detail reproduction of DPXm series (at low iso) is out of this world. Shame the poor high-iso and weird color blotches... When Sigma will solve that...

"Macro" ? If you call a 1:3 ratio "Macro". Don't just repeat the marketing crap ad nauseum. 1:1 is Macro ... 1:3 is just "close-up" or some other amorphous term.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2013 at 18:29 UTC
In reply to:

emircruz: without really telling me how it works..

Can someone school me about Faveon Sensors? What it's good and bad at?

too lazy to google

Per Marek: Better than ANY other camera with traditional sensor ?? What a load of absolute crap. Most recent Medium Format backs will positively destroy the Sigma, and even the lowly Nikon D800e is better (downsampling the D800e for smaller print sizes dramatically increases the "per pixel sharpness" and at larger print sizes, it's not even close).

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2013 at 18:27 UTC

Pretty sure the sensor is different between the iPhone 4s and iPhone 5 even if the megapixel count is the same.

PS - the LENS is 8 megapixel ? Surely there's no such thing as an "8 megapixel, five element lens with f2.4 aperture" ??

Direct link | Posted on Sep 13, 2012 at 07:46 UTC as 48th comment
In reply to:

latinware: Kim, it's great. Not only he has ballz, but hi has enough knowledge of street photography...

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. He has a little knowledge of street photography (well recycled cliches mostly, but you get my point - which I have chosen to make through using a cliched aphorism).

Direct link | Posted on Aug 14, 2012 at 08:37 UTC
In reply to:

Dan1964: I like Eric Kim I subscribe to him on youtube

That would be an example of vast reductionism and oversimplification. What I said explicitly is that great photographers tend not to have YouTube videos to which you can subscribe - but you still haven't remotely understood my point. I shall explicate it fully rather than relying upon your initiative:

Eric Kim is a social phenomenon, whose fame is derived entirely from outlets such as YouTube and his blog (marketing and self-promotion), rather than through his photographic output. There is nothing wrong with this, in isolation, however it is becoming obvious (even in this thread) that people are increasingly believing he has garnered accolades and renown for being a great street photographer - ala Bruce Gilden. My point is that this is not the case. There is a distinction between an internet star and a great photographer (and very few world class photographers have YouTube channels - at least at this point in time).

Direct link | Posted on Aug 14, 2012 at 08:35 UTC
In reply to:

Dan1964: I like Eric Kim I subscribe to him on youtube

How many of today's great photographers do YOU "subscribe to on YouTube", hmmn ? 'Nuff said ...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 14, 2012 at 06:23 UTC
In reply to:

thubleau7: From looking at his sample photographs there is nothing he can teach me about street photography .
the samples are just C**P.
I just think DPR should spend more time on getting out reviews then endless no sensical articles on the front web page.
most here dont care about this stuff we just want honest reviews and tests of equipment and then most if not all head straight to the forums to see whats happening.

total waste of web space.

People around here act like there will be a certain level of merit or "quality standard" in every thing DPR chooses to post.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 14, 2012 at 06:22 UTC
In reply to:

Mssimo: I think he was on a digitalrev video. He did street photography with film/flash setup. He would get right in peoples faces. I have to give him some respect..he has ballz. I did not find any of the front page images on his site very good but I know he is a really good street photographer.

I've never heard anybody with any knowledge of street photography call him a "really good" or even "moderately good" street photographer. I think you may need to learn a little more about street photography, so that your "knowledge" is a little more well-rounded, ahem ...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 14, 2012 at 06:17 UTC
In reply to:

Philip Corlis: Kim is a genuinely underwhelming figure in contemporary street photography. Looks like it was a very slow news day at DPReview.

Yes. I'm actually a little annoyed with them for this ill-conceived "click through" cross-promotional opportunity. Content should be "king", not page views ...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 14, 2012 at 06:15 UTC
In reply to:

VadymA: Sorry but the entire article looks like a high school essay; nothing more than a compilation of thoughts that have already been said by somebody, somewhere, sometime. And I had exactly the same feeling when looking at his portfolio. I definitely respect Eric for pursuing his passion but I am quite puzzled by how his work could already make him so "popular".

It's clearly NOT his "work" which makes him popular. It was his self-promotion ... but therein lies a lesson really doesn't it ? I thought everybody already knew the cliche "it's not what you know, it's WHO you know" (in this case, Leica).

Direct link | Posted on Aug 14, 2012 at 06:14 UTC
In reply to:

Dan1964: I like Eric Kim I subscribe to him on youtube

LOL - I'm assuming this was deliberately ironic ... and hence VERY funny !

Direct link | Posted on Aug 14, 2012 at 06:12 UTC
Total: 22, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »