I'm surprised by how insistent folks are here about the size issue. Yes, Micro Four Thirds is a smaller sensor, but Panasonic deserves lots of credit for being first-to-market with mirrorless, portable, CONTINUOUS f/2.8 aperture zoom lenses that are not priced into the stratosphere. Their G lenses, especially 12-35mm and 35-100mm, are a dream team.
Someone in one of my camera user groups said it best: evidenced by the launch of the a6300 simultaneously today, which is a jaw-dropping bargain, it's clear that Sony is in a panic to keep its coffers full from high-tier revenue, while its margins on electronic bodies is slipping away (just like HDTVs and smartphones where they can't make their big wealthy margins anymore). All the marketing jargon about these lenses is motivated by profit, to justify dramatically inflated pricing on these "G-Masters," but actual tests will mean everything.
tkbslc: Since I am sure someone will say it is too expensive, how much is a high-grade 21mm f1.9 for FF?
Yikes! I had high hopes for the new Voigtlander 10.5mm f/0.95 hyperprime, but look at these sample pictures: awful! http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20150611_706326.html
Since I haven't seen anyone mention it, wondering if anyone has comments on whether I should upgrade from my ultra-compact Oly 9-18mm zoom that starts at f/4. Am I gaining much more than a couple of mm on the low end, and a wee bit more brightness?
Their bags from a few years ago were brilliant, including the Lino and Veloce, because they were cleverly idiot-proof (myself being a frequent idiot) by putting the main compartment zipper on the straps side, so that you couldn't just walk away with the bag and let the other unzipped side flip down and drop all your lenses. Why they abandoned this clever design idea is beyond me (apart from the inevitable whining from people used to conventional bags, which they should have ignored).
Lost opportunity: they should have called it "Monomate"! As it is, "That Steady Thing" sounds like the title to a rom-com.
dpreview digested the news incorrectly on multiple fronts. For instance, the sensor size of the BMPCC is not smaller than the BMCC models. They are all, however, smaller than the BM4K.
Also, there is no software update for the BMPCC "available on the Web site." It's just shipping with the "update."
ryanshoots: Good news for those five folks with the Windows tablet.
On a more serious note. Real photo editing is going to take place on a dedicated computer with lots of processing power and large monitor.
The kind of editing done on tablets is already handled by a plethora of apps. (not sure about the Win tablet, it's got limited apps, so maybe not the plethora that are available for IOS or Android)
On the tablet, Adobe would be conspicuous by their absence. They are only going to bring a "me too" effort so they can tick the box and that is about it.
Some people who are extremely serious and detailed about photography also live part of their lives in mobility, needing simplified equipment on-the-run for modest outputs. Duh.
Windows RT paired with this new program is fantastic. If I want to share anything quickly while away from the desktop, this is ideal. And using Remote Desktop, truly the best in its class, I get my monster computer at home on a remote connection with a symmetrical screen -- looks identical to sitting in front of the workstation, minus the three-panel array.
Let's not forget that Kipon is on the way. Metabones will see some healthy price competition.
Kinematic Digit: How exciting! The Conurus partnership is working well with Metabones. I wonder how long before AF is possible. I know Conurus has always been indicated as a distinct possibility down the road that AF might be possible. If he can make Contax N lenses work on EOS, I have all the faith that Conurus will make AF work for NEX/EOS combination. I wonder if that side accessory port will allow for upgrading which might be for AF down the road?
Much better info on the NEX-VG20, including full video trailer, specifications, and link to product page: