Here I can complain only about price. Sony margin for SLT a77ii which now sells with grip for $900 is substantially smaller.
Again, they could have reused live settings preview from SLT cameras instead of closing aperture and loosing PDAF and causing EVF lags. It's really bad. They probably saved 3 man months in the early stage of NEX development and now every new camera behaves that way. From my experience with Japanese companies, the guy who developed original AF in NEX probably has been promoted, so now it's not just 3 Japanese salaries to fix.
There are many small things Sony will be improving one by one in each new camera.
But with my A6000 I am mostly annoyed with eye sensor triggering too early - about 4" from the belly. I would like to be able to setup proximity sensor sensitivity.
I actually like A7m2 a lot. If proximity sensor is fixed, I'll probably have to buy it. Otherwise I am thinking about real FF or maybe wait for A7m3.
Xentrax: I actually like how A7 line looks. And I like this camera.
I would like built-in wireless flash controller serving also as a small flash, and with HSS.
Hopefully, in this camera EVF-LCD eye sensor triggers at s smaller distance than 4" in previous cameras. This was a major showstopper for me.
Another problem was that camera always works in aperture preview mode, causing EVF lags and reduced AF performance due to less light reaching sensor. I don't think that is ever fixed.
Actually, since Sony introduced Live Effects in SLR cameras (like A580) and then SLT cameras (like A65), they did not have the problem. Aperture is fully open during AF.
Besides different DOF. final image exposure might be slightly different from Live View Setting preview in A65. But the difference is minor.
Also, when LE-EA4 adapter is installed, Effects Preview do work with aperture fully open. So Sony firmware still has most of the required algorithms already in place.
They are just lazy (it's not bad at all). And we don't complain enough (that's the bad thing).
I think they just implemented AF in video with ability to select any aperture, and then Sony just reused the algorithm in static photo.
I actually like how A7 line looks. And I like this camera.
GPS was a unique feature in a cheap A65. Pricier A77M2 does not have GPS.
And no dedicated AF assist red lamp! Hopefully they give 50% discount...
From some tests available AF seems to be good. Sony needed AF improvement. Sony used to have bad AF-C and small AF area.But how do people decide that A6000 EVF so much worse than in NEX-7? By specs? Or there some apparent deficiency? Bigger pixels mean better colors and less wiring. Is microdispaly size smaller?
A6000 lacks just one feature. I would pay some more to get SEALED cropped body. But even if Sony does such a camera, it will charge much more.
And there is no 16-50/2.8 cropped lens. A-mount has such lens, and SEALED and with SSM.f/4 is really not enough for cropped sensor both in terms of ISO and in terms of DOF. There is non-SSM 24-70 FE, which seems to be a good upgrade path. I may go that route after seeing ISO performance tests.
I get it that all that is solved with A7+24-70/4 FE, but there are issues like no Electronic Front Curtain Shutter and also price.
Currently I think I would buy A77 successor, not this one. Or both, SLT will stay home, this one - with me.
Xentrax: What type of menu does it have? NEX or RX?
Yes, but RX menu is not that convenient as A65's or A580's let alone A700's. A700's FN button full screen menu + wheel(s) allowed very fast setting modification.
What type of menu does it have? NEX or RX?
I may be wrong, but I can see in the photo above that Panasonic did not enable 150% scaling in Windows 8 in this demo unit. The UI elements will still be rather small with 150% scaling but usable. What we see in the picture is not usable at all.
The camera is good, so it's a dissapointment that it seems to have small AF area and it does not have built-in flash (for emergency cases and for driving wireless flashes). I'm not switching to Nikon becaue I like in-camera stabilization but I am not spending money on A99.
Sony could license lens design from Olympus XZ-1. F2.5 at 112mm eq. is more than 4x brighter than Sony’s typical F5.6-F6.3. F1.8 at 28mm eq. is more than 2x brighter than Sony’s typical F3.2.
Sony would have at least 1 decent compact camera then. Such camera does not have to sell well; its only purpose is to make people mention Sony as a compact camera brand; as a measure of the PR effect, DPReview may even decide to review such camera like they did with LX3, XZ-1, S95, P300. DPReview have never reviewed a Sony or Kodak(!) compact camera separately.