I may be wrong, but I can see in the photo above that Panasonic did not enable 150% scaling in Windows 8 in this demo unit. The UI elements will still be rather small with 150% scaling but usable. What we see in the picture is not usable at all.
The camera is good, so it's a dissapointment that it seems to have small AF area and it does not have built-in flash (for emergency cases and for driving wireless flashes). I'm not switching to Nikon becaue I like in-camera stabilization but I am not spending money on A99.
Sony could license lens design from Olympus XZ-1. F2.5 at 112mm eq. is more than 4x brighter than Sony’s typical F5.6-F6.3. F1.8 at 28mm eq. is more than 2x brighter than Sony’s typical F3.2.
Sony would have at least 1 decent compact camera then. Such camera does not have to sell well; its only purpose is to make people mention Sony as a compact camera brand; as a measure of the PR effect, DPReview may even decide to review such camera like they did with LX3, XZ-1, S95, P300. DPReview have never reviewed a Sony or Kodak(!) compact camera separately.
I could find only 5 flaws in the camera:
Unlike Samsung or Nikon, Canon decided to go with 4:3 aspect ratio(#1) which is wrong in the era of wide screens, considering that most compact camera users make only landscape shots. Hopefully this sensor does not end up in a mirror-less interchangeable lens camera by Canon.
This heavy(#2) camera has no GPS receiver(#3) or automatic lens cover(#4), has small battery(#5) but it features rather useless viewfinder.