nawknai

nawknai

Lives in Australia Australia
Works as a Medical physicist
Joined on Oct 30, 2007

Comments

Total: 276, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Xentinus: I know there are many "if" scenarios and I don't want to be unfair for an innovative company;but while it is not lightweight and there are prime options, If it was 20-35 f 2.0 then it would have been special.
18-35 1.8 was/is special because of 1.8 aperture at 18mm.

Since I'd be much more likely to shoot at 24 and 35 mm, and not at 70 mm, I'd say this lens serves a great purpose to those who would shoot using 2 primes within those two focal lengths.

The 24-70 mm f/2.8 never suited me. I owned one, but didn't use it as much as I thought I would.

Why do people talk about the 24-70 as if it's some kind of benchmark? It's not a lens for everyone.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 20, 2015 at 23:57 UTC
In reply to:

alatchin: These are very interesting products... For those who clearly need speed over range this seems a compelling option... However the whole purpose of a zoom is versatility.

What we have done here is reduce some versatility in the range... well quite a lot really... for a slightly better noise performance.

I would be curious how well this would sell.

It shoots at f/2, which offers a LOT of versatility.

It just happens to be a different type of versatility than you're talking about.

Personally, I love shooting with 24, 35, 50, and 85 mm primes. Ideally, I'd be shooting with 24 mm, 43mm, and 85 mm primes, but 43 mm is hard to come by except on maybe Pentax.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 20, 2015 at 23:54 UTC
In reply to:

RedFox88: If Leica made this they'd market it as a 24mm and a 35mm prime both f/2 in one lens. And they'd charge $4500 for it!

Only $4500. Where did you see Leica lenses on sale?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 20, 2015 at 23:50 UTC
On Leica Q First Impressions Review preview (561 comments in total)

I love this camera, and I don't think it's THAT bad a deal. It's still too expensive for me though!

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 12:09 UTC as 87th comment
On Sony a7R II has 42.4MP on full frame BSI CMOS sensor article (1256 comments in total)
In reply to:

princecody: Who owns it?

It's sitting in a box, unopened, and yet it's already his favourite camera.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 12:02 UTC
On Sony a7R II has 42.4MP on full frame BSI CMOS sensor article (1256 comments in total)
In reply to:

supeyugin1: No touchscreen, 5 fps? really? It's not gonna fly, and 42MP who needs that much?
4K video with shitty compression? Not gonna work that good.

Since when did high-res variants of cameras become sports cameras? 5 fps is absolutely fine for this camera.

Just wait for a lower resolution version (A7S-2)

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 11:59 UTC
On Sony a7R II has 42.4MP on full frame BSI CMOS sensor article (1256 comments in total)
In reply to:

BillyBobSenna: I'm still trying to get my head around if this camera will be as good as say a Nikon D750 for action photography? Is the speed of the AF and usability of the EVF going to provide at least equal capability? I know there is still the question of lens availability for action photography however I just want to know if the basic platform has at least equal potential. I have a Sony A6000 and my experience is that it is not an action camera.

How much action do you intend on capturing with a battery that small?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 11:54 UTC
On Sony a7R II has 42.4MP on full frame BSI CMOS sensor article (1256 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nanospeed1: Guys, here is a petition for Sony for the uncompressed RAW implementation.... Please sign it if that's a critical issue for you (as it certainly is for me!)

https://www.change.org/p/kazuo-hirai-enable-uncompressed-or-lossless-compression-raw-files-on-the-a7-cameras-and-future-f-e-mount-cameras

p.s. to censor: Yes, I posted it under the other article too but the more signatures, the more voice and (hopefully) more happy Sony-photographers in the future! :-)

Doesn't Sony cook their RAWs anyway?

I just want data that's OOC. To me, that's what a RAW is supposed to be.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 11:49 UTC
On Sony a7R II has 42.4MP on full frame BSI CMOS sensor article (1256 comments in total)
In reply to:

robjons: "It also offers a fully electronic silent shutter."

Then why do we need a mechanical shutter at all?

Rolling shutter effect, which will cause a distortion of a moving subject.

It could be something as simple as a person walking. That person will look bendy in a weird way.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 11, 2015 at 11:47 UTC
On Sony launches Z3+ with 20MP camera post (36 comments in total)

I wish they hadn't made the phone thinner. I love physical shutter buttons on phones, but I find them difficult to hold properly when the phone is too thin. There's no grip, and it's just a PITA to hold thinner phones and press the shutter button.

That's why the Xperia Z3 was less comfortable to hold than the Z3 Compact. Well, not for normal use, but certainly when holding it sideways and using it as a camera.

Direct link | Posted on May 30, 2015 at 09:58 UTC as 3rd comment
On Sony launches Z3+ with 20MP camera post (36 comments in total)
In reply to:

straylightrun: What's the point of these halfgrades? Who upgrades their phone ever 6 months?

I'm not sure if you were being serious with that comment or not, but....

Not many people, but the launch of a new phone isn't done to be in sync with every individual's upgrade cycle.

I think updates every 6 months is actually a pretty good idea. The person who's just about to get a new phone is always going to benefit, which means everybody who's looking at getting an Xperia is going to benefit.

Direct link | Posted on May 30, 2015 at 09:55 UTC
On Sony launches Z3+ with 20MP camera post (36 comments in total)
In reply to:

sportyaccordy: If this is anything like the 20MP camera in my Z3, pass on it. The JPGs out of it are smeary, flat and just generally awful, and it doesn't do RAW. Even if it did, it wouldn't be worth the time spent processing files. I think the big issue is the lens. If they haven't fixed that it's DOA. The phone is excellent otherwise but the camera was a huge let down.

Their processing sucks. Nothing wrong with the sensors. ;)

But yeah.....I get what you're saying. This is probably going to disappoint you anyway, because I doubt Sony learned how to process their own RAW data from their own Sony sensor.

Direct link | Posted on May 30, 2015 at 09:51 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-CM1 camera review post (243 comments in total)
In reply to:

Thomas Kachadurian: If it had OIS i would buy one tomorrow. Without it it will be unusable to anyone who isn't naturally steady.

Unusable? How so?

Other than my Nokia 925 and 930, I've never had an actual camera with IBIS on it. Lenses? Sure, but OIS made them larger than they had to be, for sure.

Direct link | Posted on May 27, 2015 at 20:04 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-CM1 camera review post (243 comments in total)
In reply to:

zodiacfml: how much is it these days?
my previous comment for this device was to by a $500 RX100 and the other $500 to buy a flagship smartphone such as an S6 or i6.

That would completely defeat the purpose of owning one device, but you can make that comparison if you think that's fair.

Direct link | Posted on May 27, 2015 at 20:02 UTC
In reply to:

MikeF4Black: I'd always prefer my Tumi messenger bag, black ballistic nylon, to which an appropriate Billingham insert has been added. It holds a D800E with one prime easily, a lot of other stuff, an iPad and some documents.

And it doesn't look like a murse, it looks the business. And fortunately it doesn't "sport" a red dot.

Ha!

Or just get a model without the red dot. Jeebus....

Direct link | Posted on May 25, 2015 at 11:14 UTC
In reply to:

FinDERP: Looks a lovely bag but it's way out of the range I'd be willing to pay for something like this - even if I had a large disposable budget I'd sooner spend it on lenses and probably large format gear too large to fit in anything carryable anyway haha.

I appreciate that ONA is taking time to answer comments and queries here though, that's really a great effort and I wish more companies would act like this!

The bag I had mentioned earlier.

http://topodesigns.com/collections/bags/products/field-bag

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2015 at 06:50 UTC
In reply to:

bigdaddave: I could never be seen with a bag that is worth more than the gear inside it.

What an utter waste of money

That bag is worth more than the gear you have inside it?

Damn, that sucks. Sorry to hear that.

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2015 at 06:49 UTC
In reply to:

ARB1: Bag without the Leica dot $59.99, with the Leica dot $399.99.

Your real problem happens when they they try to slash the outside of your bag open. ;). I believe it's a bit more common for backpacks because you don't have eyes in the back of your head, and your back is less sensitive to touch, and so you're less likely to notice.

I suppose a way to lock your bag shut would prevent opportunistic theft(?).

Direct link | Posted on May 22, 2015 at 09:31 UTC
In reply to:

FinDERP: Looks a lovely bag but it's way out of the range I'd be willing to pay for something like this - even if I had a large disposable budget I'd sooner spend it on lenses and probably large format gear too large to fit in anything carryable anyway haha.

I appreciate that ONA is taking time to answer comments and queries here though, that's really a great effort and I wish more companies would act like this!

@FinDERP: Ever heard of Topo Design? They make several bags that may suit your needs, although there's no padding because they're not camera bags. They're still appropriately sized though, and one model was sort of designed for fishing!!

Direct link | Posted on May 22, 2015 at 09:25 UTC
In reply to:

nawknai: I'm a huge fan of bags, and own lots of them. I don't mean camera bags, but all bags. I'm a guy, and I'm not overly trendy otherwise, but I like bag design.

With that declared, I'll say this about "messenger" bags: The flaps are usually a issue for camera bags because they prevent you from reaching your camera quickly. That, and flaps on some bags are too long. If you include a flap, it needs to be shorter.

I understand that a flap is generally regarded as being more weather resistant than simply using a zipper, but I'd personally rather have a zipper anyway. I know people don't like them because plastic zippers feel cheap, while metal zippers may scratch your gear. However, a waterproof zip may work for some people.

Personally, I don't have a camera bag anymore. My X100 sits in its hard-case, and I wear it across the shoulder. Same goes for my X-Pro1, and if I bring another lens, I keep it in whichever man-bag I'm carrying.

EDIT: The Roma has a good accessible opening!

If you included a zipper, perhaps make the zipper pathway (sorry, don't know what to call it) "U"-shaped rather than straight so that the opening is bigger? If someone wants to leave the bag completely open, they could fold the resulting flat downwards and into what is currently the laptop/tablet section?

The result would be a closed bag when you need it, and a completely open bag when you want quick and frequent access to the inside?

To be honest, I don't know what the solution is. I have a particular Porter man-bag with a top opening that I frequently carry my X100 in sometimes (no padding, but in hard case), and I really like it because the bag has no flap. It uses a zipper straight across, and its opening is fairly large, but I can image many other people complain that their 5D-Mk3 is too big to fit through it. That's why I suggest a zipper that isn't straight across.

http://www.yoshidakaban.com/product/101410.html?p=s&p_itemtype=07&p_lisize=30&p_lisort=

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2015 at 22:29 UTC
Total: 276, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »